From 1a1220c5e4e0afa97a053536254dddf6a68551f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Jung Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:48:55 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] validation should only catch UB errors --- .../src/interpret/validity.rs | 37 ++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs index ee55b4a0750..c130252e249 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ use rustc_target::abi::{Abi, Scalar as ScalarAbi, Size, VariantIdx, Variants, Wr use std::hash::Hash; +// for the validation errors +use super::UndefinedBehaviorInfo::*; use super::{ CheckInAllocMsg, GlobalAlloc, ImmTy, Immediate, InterpCx, InterpResult, MPlaceTy, Machine, MemPlaceMeta, OpTy, Scalar, ValueVisitor, @@ -59,6 +61,7 @@ macro_rules! throw_validation_failure { /// }); /// ``` /// +/// The patterns must be of type `UndefinedBehaviorInfo`. /// An additional expected parameter can also be added to the failure message: /// /// ``` @@ -86,7 +89,7 @@ macro_rules! try_validation { // allocation here as this can only slow down builds that fail anyway. Err(e) => match e.kind() { $( - $($p)|+ => + InterpError::UndefinedBehavior($($p)|+) => throw_validation_failure!( $where, { $( $what_fmt ),+ } $( expected { $( $expected_fmt ),+ } )? @@ -312,7 +315,7 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'mir, ' Ok(try_validation!( self.ecx.read_immediate(op), self.path, - err_ub!(InvalidUninitBytes(None)) => { "uninitialized memory" } expected { "{expected}" } + InvalidUninitBytes(None) => { "uninitialized memory" } expected { "{expected}" } )) } @@ -337,8 +340,8 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'mir, ' let (_ty, _trait) = try_validation!( self.ecx.get_ptr_vtable(vtable), self.path, - err_ub!(DanglingIntPointer(..)) | - err_ub!(InvalidVTablePointer(..)) => + DanglingIntPointer(..) | + InvalidVTablePointer(..) => { "{vtable}" } expected { "a vtable pointer" }, ); // FIXME: check if the type/trait match what ty::Dynamic says? @@ -374,7 +377,7 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'mir, ' let size_and_align = try_validation!( self.ecx.size_and_align_of_mplace(&place), self.path, - err_ub!(InvalidMeta(msg)) => { "invalid {} metadata: {}", kind, msg }, + InvalidMeta(msg) => { "invalid {} metadata: {}", kind, msg }, ); let (size, align) = size_and_align // for the purpose of validity, consider foreign types to have @@ -390,21 +393,21 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'mir, ' CheckInAllocMsg::InboundsTest, // will anyway be replaced by validity message ), self.path, - err_ub!(AlignmentCheckFailed { required, has }) => + AlignmentCheckFailed { required, has } => { "an unaligned {kind} (required {} byte alignment but found {})", required.bytes(), has.bytes() }, - err_ub!(DanglingIntPointer(0, _)) => + DanglingIntPointer(0, _) => { "a null {kind}" }, - err_ub!(DanglingIntPointer(i, _)) => + DanglingIntPointer(i, _) => { "a dangling {kind} (address {i:#x} is unallocated)" }, - err_ub!(PointerOutOfBounds { .. }) => + PointerOutOfBounds { .. } => { "a dangling {kind} (going beyond the bounds of its allocation)" }, // This cannot happen during const-eval (because interning already detects // dangling pointers), but it can happen in Miri. - err_ub!(PointerUseAfterFree(..)) => + PointerUseAfterFree(..) => { "a dangling {kind} (use-after-free)" }, ); // Do not allow pointers to uninhabited types. @@ -475,7 +478,7 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'mir, ' try_validation!( value.to_bool(), self.path, - err_ub!(InvalidBool(..)) => + InvalidBool(..) => { "{:x}", value } expected { "a boolean" }, ); Ok(true) @@ -485,7 +488,7 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'mir, ' try_validation!( value.to_char(), self.path, - err_ub!(InvalidChar(..)) => + InvalidChar(..) => { "{:x}", value } expected { "a valid unicode scalar value (in `0..=0x10FFFF` but not in `0xD800..=0xDFFF`)" }, ); Ok(true) @@ -544,8 +547,8 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'mir, ' let _fn = try_validation!( self.ecx.get_ptr_fn(ptr), self.path, - err_ub!(DanglingIntPointer(..)) | - err_ub!(InvalidFunctionPointer(..)) => + DanglingIntPointer(..) | + InvalidFunctionPointer(..) => { "{ptr}" } expected { "a function pointer" }, ); // FIXME: Check if the signature matches @@ -660,9 +663,9 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValueVisitor<'mir, 'tcx, M> Ok(try_validation!( this.ecx.read_discriminant(op), this.path, - err_ub!(InvalidTag(val)) => + InvalidTag(val) => { "{:x}", val } expected { "a valid enum tag" }, - err_ub!(InvalidUninitBytes(None)) => + InvalidUninitBytes(None) => { "uninitialized bytes" } expected { "a valid enum tag" }, ) .1) @@ -805,7 +808,7 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValueVisitor<'mir, 'tcx, M> try_validation!( self.ecx.read_bytes_ptr_strip_provenance(mplace.ptr, Size::from_bytes(len)), self.path, - err_ub!(InvalidUninitBytes(..)) => { "uninitialized data in `str`" }, + InvalidUninitBytes(..) => { "uninitialized data in `str`" }, ); } ty::Array(tys, ..) | ty::Slice(tys)