Fix comment placement in compiletest

src/test/compiletest/compiletest.rs

@@ -14,31 +14,33 @@ import std::task;
 
 tag mode { mode_compile_fail; mode_run_fail; mode_run_pass; }
 
-type config =  // The library paths required for running the compiler
+type config = {
-    // The library paths required for running compiled programs
+ // The library paths required for running the compiler
-    // The rustc executable
+ compile_lib_path: str,
-    // The directory containing the tests to run
+ // The library paths required for running compiled programs
-    // The directory where programs should be built
+ run_lib_path: str,
-    // The name of the stage being built (stage1, etc)
+ // The rustc executable
-    // The test mode, compile-fail, run-fail, run-pass
+ rustc_path: str,
-    // Run ignored tests
+ // The directory containing the tests to run
-    // Only run tests that match this filter
+ src_base: str,
-    // A command line to prefix program execution with,
+ // The directory where programs should be built
-    // for running under valgrind
+ build_base: str,
-    // Flags to pass to the compiler
+ // The name of the stage being built (stage1, etc)
-    // Explain what's going on
+ stage_id: str,
-    {compile_lib_path: str,
+ // The test mode, compile-fail, run-fail, run-pass
-     run_lib_path: str,
+ mode: mode,
-     rustc_path: str,
+ // Run ignored tests
-     src_base: str,
+ run_ignored: bool,
-     build_base: str,
+ // Only run tests that match this filter
-     stage_id: str,
+ filter: option::t[str],
-     mode: mode,
+ // A command line to prefix program execution with,
-     run_ignored: bool,
+ // for running under valgrind
-     filter: option::t[str],
+ runtool: option::t[str],
-     runtool: option::t[str],
+ // Flags to pass to the compiler
-     rustcflags: option::t[str],
+ rustcflags: option::t[str],
-     verbose: bool};
+ // Explain what's going on
+ verbose: bool
+};
 
 fn main(args: vec[str]) {
 
@@ -230,7 +232,8 @@ So actually shuttling structural data across tasks isn't possible at this
 time, but we can send strings! Sadly, I need the whole config record, in the
 test task so, instead of fixing the mechanism in the compiler I'm going to
 break up the config record and pass everything individually to the spawned
-function.  */
+function.
+*/
 
 fn closure_to_task(cx: cx, configport: port[str], testfn: &fn() ) -> task {
     testfn();