Regression tests and updates to existing tests.

The regression tests explore:
  (direct | indirect | doubly-indirect | unsafe) x (embedded | param):

where:
  embedded: `struct Wrapper(... NoDerive ...);`
  param:    `struct Wrapper<X>(... X ...);`

  direct:          `const A:     Wrapper<...> = Wrapper(NoDerive);`
  indirect:        `const A: & & Wrapper<...> = Wrapper(NoDerive)`
  doubly-indirect: `const A: & & Wrapper<...> = & & Wrapper(& & NoDerive)`
  unsafe:          `const A: UnsafeWrap<...>  = UnsafeWrap(std::ptr::null())`

src/test/ui/issues/issue-55511.rs

@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ fn main() {
     //~^ ERROR `a` does not live long enough [E0597]
     match b {
         <() as Foo<'static>>::C => { }
+        //~^ WARN must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+        //~| WARN will become a hard error in a future release
         _ => { }
     }
 }

src/test/ui/issues/issue-55511.stderr

@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+warning: to use a constant of type `std::cell::Cell` in a pattern, `std::cell::Cell` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+  --> $DIR/issue-55511.rs:16:9
+   |
+LL |         <() as Foo<'static>>::C => { }
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = note: #[warn(indirect_structural_match)] on by default
+   = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
+   = note: for more information, see issue #62411 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62411>
+
 error[E0597]: `a` does not live long enough
   --> $DIR/issue-55511.rs:13:28
    |

src/test/ui/rfc1445/allow-hide-behind-direct-unsafe-ptr-embedded.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// Test explores how `#[structral_match]` behaves in tandem with
+// `*const` and `*mut` pointers.
+
+// run-pass
+
+struct NoDerive(i32);
+
+// This impl makes NoDerive irreflexive
+// (which doesn't matter here because `<*const T>::eq` won't recur on `T`).
+impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
+
+impl Eq for NoDerive { }
+
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
+struct WrapEmbedded(*const NoDerive);
+
+const WRAP_UNSAFE_EMBEDDED: WrapEmbedded = WrapEmbedded(std::ptr::null());
+
+fn main() {
+    match WRAP_UNSAFE_EMBEDDED {
+        WRAP_UNSAFE_EMBEDDED => { println!("WRAP_UNSAFE_EMBEDDED correctly matched itself"); }
+        _ => { panic!("WRAP_UNSAFE_EMBEDDED did not match itself"); }
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/allow-hide-behind-direct-unsafe-ptr-param.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// Test explores how `#[structral_match]` behaves in tandem with
+// `*const` and `*mut` pointers.
+
+// run-pass
+
+struct NoDerive(i32);
+
+// This impl makes NoDerive irreflexive
+// (which doesn't matter here because `<*const T>::eq` won't recur on `T`).
+impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
+
+impl Eq for NoDerive { }
+
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
+struct WrapParam<X>(*const X);
+
+const WRAP_UNSAFE_PARAM: WrapParam<NoDerive> = WrapParam(std::ptr::null());
+
+fn main() {
+    match WRAP_UNSAFE_PARAM {
+        WRAP_UNSAFE_PARAM => { println!("WRAP_UNSAFE_PARAM correctly matched itself"); }
+        _ => { panic!("WRAP_UNSAFE_PARAM did not match itself"); }
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/allow-hide-behind-indirect-unsafe-ptr-embedded.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// Test explores how `#[structral_match]` behaves in tandem with
+// `*const` and `*mut` pointers.
+
+// run-pass
+
+struct NoDerive(i32);
+
+// This impl makes NoDerive irreflexive
+// (which doesn't matter here because `<*const T>::eq` won't recur on `T`).
+impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
+
+impl Eq for NoDerive { }
+
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
+struct WrapEmbedded(*const NoDerive);
+
+const WRAP_UNSAFE_EMBEDDED: & &WrapEmbedded = & &WrapEmbedded(std::ptr::null());
+
+fn main() {
+    match WRAP_UNSAFE_EMBEDDED {
+        WRAP_UNSAFE_EMBEDDED => { println!("WRAP_UNSAFE_EMBEDDED correctly matched itself"); }
+        _ => { panic!("WRAP_UNSAFE_EMBEDDED did not match itself"); }
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/allow-hide-behind-indirect-unsafe-ptr-param.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// Test explores how `#[structral_match]` behaves in tandem with
+// `*const` and `*mut` pointers.
+
+// run-pass
+
+struct NoDerive(i32);
+
+// This impl makes NoDerive irreflexive
+// (which doesn't matter here because `<*const T>::eq` won't recur on `T`).
+impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
+
+impl Eq for NoDerive { }
+
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
+struct WrapParam<X>(*const X);
+
+const WRAP_UNSAFE_PARAM: & &WrapParam<NoDerive> = & &WrapParam(std::ptr::null());
+
+fn main() {
+    match WRAP_UNSAFE_PARAM {
+        WRAP_UNSAFE_PARAM => { println!("WRAP_UNSAFE_PARAM correctly matched itself"); }
+        _ => { panic!("WRAP_UNSAFE_PARAM did not match itself"); }
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-direct-struct-embedded.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// This is part of a set of tests exploring the different ways a
+// `#[structural_match]` ADT might try to hold a
+// non-`#[structural_match]` in hidden manner that lets matches
+// through that we had intended to reject.
+//
+// See discussion on rust-lang/rust#62307 and rust-lang/rust#62339
+
+struct NoDerive(i32);
+
+// This impl makes NoDerive irreflexive.
+impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
+
+impl Eq for NoDerive { }
+
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
+struct WrapInline(NoDerive);
+
+const WRAP_DIRECT_INLINE: WrapInline = WrapInline(NoDerive(0));
+
+fn main() {
+    match WRAP_DIRECT_INLINE {
+        WRAP_DIRECT_INLINE => { panic!("WRAP_DIRECT_INLINE matched itself"); }
+        //~^ ERROR must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+        _ => { println!("WRAP_DIRECT_INLINE did not match itself"); }
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-direct-struct-embedded.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+error: to use a constant of type `NoDerive` in a pattern, `NoDerive` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+  --> $DIR/cant-hide-behind-direct-struct-embedded.rs:22:9
+   |
+LL |         WRAP_DIRECT_INLINE => { panic!("WRAP_DIRECT_INLINE matched itself"); }
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-direct-struct-param.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// This is part of a set of tests exploring the different ways a
+// `#[structural_match]` ADT might try to hold a
+// non-`#[structural_match]` in hidden manner that lets matches
+// through that we had intended to reject.
+//
+// See discussion on rust-lang/rust#62307 and rust-lang/rust#62339
+
+struct NoDerive(i32);
+
+// This impl makes NoDerive irreflexive.
+impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
+
+impl Eq for NoDerive { }
+
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
+struct WrapParam<T>(T);
+
+const WRAP_DIRECT_PARAM: WrapParam<NoDerive> = WrapParam(NoDerive(0));
+
+fn main() {
+    match WRAP_DIRECT_PARAM {
+        WRAP_DIRECT_PARAM => { panic!("WRAP_DIRECT_PARAM matched itself"); }
+        //~^ ERROR must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+        _ => { println!("WRAP_DIRECT_PARAM did not match itself"); }
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-direct-struct-param.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+error: to use a constant of type `NoDerive` in a pattern, `NoDerive` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+  --> $DIR/cant-hide-behind-direct-struct-param.rs:22:9
+   |
+LL |         WRAP_DIRECT_PARAM => { panic!("WRAP_DIRECT_PARAM matched itself"); }
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-doubly-indirect-embedded.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// This is part of a set of tests exploring the different ways a
+// `#[structural_match]` ADT might try to hold a
+// non-`#[structural_match]` in hidden manner that lets matches
+// through that we had intended to reject.
+//
+// See discussion on rust-lang/rust#62307 and rust-lang/rust#62339
+
+// run-pass
+
+struct NoDerive(i32);
+
+// This impl makes NoDerive irreflexive.
+impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
+
+impl Eq for NoDerive { }
+
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
+struct WrapInline<'a>(&'a &'a NoDerive);
+
+const WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_INLINE: & &WrapInline = & &WrapInline(& & NoDerive(0));
+
+fn main() {
+    match WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_INLINE {
+        WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_INLINE => { panic!("WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_INLINE matched itself"); }
+        //~^ WARN must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+        //~| WARN will become a hard error in a future release
+        _ => { println!("WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_INLINE correctly did not match itself"); }
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-doubly-indirect-embedded.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+warning: to use a constant of type `NoDerive` in a pattern, `NoDerive` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+  --> $DIR/cant-hide-behind-doubly-indirect-embedded.rs:24:9
+   |
+LL |         WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_INLINE => { panic!("WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_INLINE matched itself"); }
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = note: #[warn(indirect_structural_match)] on by default
+   = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
+   = note: for more information, see issue #62411 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62411>
+

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-doubly-indirect-param.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// This is part of a set of tests exploring the different ways a
+// `#[structural_match]` ADT might try to hold a
+// non-`#[structural_match]` in hidden manner that lets matches
+// through that we had intended to reject.
+//
+// See discussion on rust-lang/rust#62307 and rust-lang/rust#62339
+
+// run-pass
+
+struct NoDerive(i32);
+
+// This impl makes NoDerive irreflexive.
+impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
+
+impl Eq for NoDerive { }
+
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
+struct WrapParam<'a, T>(&'a &'a T);
+
+const WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM: & &WrapParam<NoDerive> = & &WrapParam(& & NoDerive(0));
+
+fn main() {
+    match WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM {
+        WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM => { panic!("WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM matched itself"); }
+        //~^ WARN must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+        //~| WARN will become a hard error in a future release
+        _ => { println!("WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM correctly did not match itself"); }
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-doubly-indirect-param.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+warning: to use a constant of type `NoDerive` in a pattern, `NoDerive` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+  --> $DIR/cant-hide-behind-doubly-indirect-param.rs:24:9
+   |
+LL |         WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM => { panic!("WRAP_DOUBLY_INDIRECT_PARAM matched itself"); }
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = note: #[warn(indirect_structural_match)] on by default
+   = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
+   = note: for more information, see issue #62411 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62411>
+

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-indirect-struct-embedded.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// This is part of a set of tests exploring the different ways a
+// `#[structural_match]` ADT might try to hold a
+// non-`#[structural_match]` in hidden manner that lets matches
+// through that we had intended to reject.
+//
+// See discussion on rust-lang/rust#62307 and rust-lang/rust#62339
+
+// run-pass
+
+struct NoDerive(i32);
+
+// This impl makes NoDerive irreflexive.
+impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
+
+impl Eq for NoDerive { }
+
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
+struct WrapInline(NoDerive);
+
+const WRAP_INDIRECT_INLINE: & &WrapInline = & &WrapInline(NoDerive(0));
+
+fn main() {
+    match WRAP_INDIRECT_INLINE {
+        WRAP_INDIRECT_INLINE => { panic!("WRAP_INDIRECT_INLINE matched itself"); }
+        //~^ WARN must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+        //~| WARN will become a hard error in a future release
+        _ => { println!("WRAP_INDIRECT_INLINE did not match itself"); }
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-indirect-struct-embedded.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+warning: to use a constant of type `NoDerive` in a pattern, `NoDerive` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+  --> $DIR/cant-hide-behind-indirect-struct-embedded.rs:24:9
+   |
+LL |         WRAP_INDIRECT_INLINE => { panic!("WRAP_INDIRECT_INLINE matched itself"); }
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = note: #[warn(indirect_structural_match)] on by default
+   = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
+   = note: for more information, see issue #62411 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62411>
+

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-indirect-struct-param.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// This is part of a set of tests exploring the different ways a
+// `#[structural_match]` ADT might try to hold a
+// non-`#[structural_match]` in hidden manner that lets matches
+// through that we had intended to reject.
+//
+// See discussion on rust-lang/rust#62307 and rust-lang/rust#62339
+
+// run-pass
+
+struct NoDerive(i32);
+
+// This impl makes NoDerive irreflexive.
+impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
+
+impl Eq for NoDerive { }
+
+#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
+struct WrapParam<T>(T);
+
+const WRAP_INDIRECT_PARAM: & &WrapParam<NoDerive> = & &WrapParam(NoDerive(0));
+
+fn main() {
+    match WRAP_INDIRECT_PARAM {
+        WRAP_INDIRECT_PARAM => { panic!("WRAP_INDIRECT_PARAM matched itself"); }
+        //~^ WARN must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+        //~| WARN will become a hard error in a future release
+        _ => { println!("WRAP_INDIRECT_PARAM correctly did not match itself"); }
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/cant-hide-behind-indirect-struct-param.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+warning: to use a constant of type `NoDerive` in a pattern, `NoDerive` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+  --> $DIR/cant-hide-behind-indirect-struct-param.rs:24:9
+   |
+LL |         WRAP_INDIRECT_PARAM => { panic!("WRAP_INDIRECT_PARAM matched itself"); }
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = note: #[warn(indirect_structural_match)] on by default
+   = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
+   = note: for more information, see issue #62411 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62411>
+

src/test/ui/rfc1445/issue-61118-match-slice-forbidden-without-eq.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// Issue 61118 pointed out a case where we hit an ICE during code gen:
+// the compiler assumed that `PartialEq` was always implemented on any
+// use of a `const` item in a pattern context, but the pre-existing
+// checking for the presence of `#[structural_match]` was too shallow
+// (see rust-lang/rust#62307), and so we hit cases where we were
+// trying to dispatch to `PartialEq` on types that did not implement
+// that trait.
+
+struct B(i32);
+
+const A: &[B] = &[];
+
+pub fn main() {
+    match &[][..] {
+        A => (),
+        //~^ ERROR must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+        _ => (),
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/issue-61118-match-slice-forbidden-without-eq.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+error: to use a constant of type `B` in a pattern, `B` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+  --> $DIR/issue-61118-match-slice-forbidden-without-eq.rs:15:9
+   |
+LL |         A => (),
+   |         ^
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+

src/test/ui/rfc1445/issue-62307-match-ref-ref-forbidden-without-eq.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// RFC 1445 introduced `#[structural_match]`; this attribute must
+// appear on the `struct`/`enum` definition for any `const` used in a
+// pattern.
+//
+// This is our (forever-unstable) way to mark a datatype as having a
+// `PartialEq` implementation that is equivalent to recursion over its
+// substructure. This avoids (at least in the short term) any need to
+// resolve the question of what semantics is used for such matching.
+// (See RFC 1445 for more details and discussion.)
+
+// Issue 62307 pointed out a case where the checking for
+// `#[structural_match]` was too shallow.
+
+// run-pass
+
+#[derive(Debug)]
+struct B(i32);
+
+// Overriding `PartialEq` to use this strange notion of "equality" exposes
+// whether `match` is using structural-equality or method-dispatch
+// under the hood, which is the antithesis of rust-lang/rfcs#1445
+impl PartialEq for B {
+    fn eq(&self, other: &B) -> bool { std::cmp::min(self.0, other.0) == 0 }
+}
+
+fn main() {
+    const RR_B0: & & B = & & B(0);
+    const RR_B1: & & B = & & B(1);
+
+    match RR_B0 {
+        RR_B1 => { println!("CLAIM RR0: {:?} matches {:?}", RR_B1, RR_B0); }
+        //~^ WARN must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+        //~| WARN will become a hard error in a future release
+        _ => { }
+    }
+
+    match RR_B1 {
+        RR_B1 => { println!("CLAIM RR1: {:?} matches {:?}", RR_B1, RR_B1); }
+        //~^ WARN must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+        //~| WARN will become a hard error in a future release
+        _ => { }
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/issue-62307-match-ref-ref-forbidden-without-eq.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+warning: to use a constant of type `B` in a pattern, `B` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+  --> $DIR/issue-62307-match-ref-ref-forbidden-without-eq.rs:31:9
+   |
+LL |         RR_B1 => { println!("CLAIM RR0: {:?} matches {:?}", RR_B1, RR_B0); }
+   |         ^^^^^
+   |
+   = note: #[warn(indirect_structural_match)] on by default
+   = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
+   = note: for more information, see issue #62411 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62411>
+
+warning: to use a constant of type `B` in a pattern, `B` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+  --> $DIR/issue-62307-match-ref-ref-forbidden-without-eq.rs:38:9
+   |
+LL |         RR_B1 => { println!("CLAIM RR1: {:?} matches {:?}", RR_B1, RR_B1); }
+   |         ^^^^^
+   |
+   = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
+   = note: for more information, see issue #62411 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62411>
+

src/test/ui/rfc1445/match-nonempty-array-forbidden-without-eq.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// Issue 62307 pointed out a case where the checking for
+// `#[structural_match]` was too shallow.
+//
+// Here we check similar behavior for non-empty arrays of types that
+// do not derive `Eq`.
+//
+// (Current behavior for empty arrays differs and thus is not tested
+// here; see rust-lang/rust#62336.)
+
+#[derive(PartialEq, Debug)]
+struct B(i32);
+
+fn main() {
+    const FOO: [B; 1] = [B(0)];
+    match [B(1)] {
+        FOO => { }
+        //~^ ERROR must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+    }
+}

src/test/ui/rfc1445/match-nonempty-array-forbidden-without-eq.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+error: to use a constant of type `B` in a pattern, `B` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]`
+  --> $DIR/match-nonempty-array-forbidden-without-eq.rs:16:9
+   |
+LL |         FOO => { }
+   |         ^^^
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+