rust/tests/ui/imports/import5.rs

// run-pass
use foo::bar;
mod foo {
    pub use foo::zed::bar;
    pub mod zed {
        pub fn bar() { println!("foo"); }
    }
}

pub fn main() { bar(); }
Add `// run-pass` annotations to all the tests under `ui/run-pass/`. (I may have accidentally added it to some auxilliary crates as well; my emacs-macro-based methodology was pretty crude.) 2018-08-30 12:18:55 +00:00			`// run-pass`
test: "import" -> "use" 2012-09-05 19:32:05 +00:00			`use foo::bar;`
Add or enable some tests. 2011-01-13 23:02:54 +00:00			`mod foo {`
test: Remove export from the tests, language, and libraries. rs=deexporting 2013-01-30 23:56:40 +00:00			`pub use foo::zed::bar;`
			`pub mod zed {`
log: Introduce liblog, the old std::logging This commit moves all logging out of the standard library into an external crate. This crate is the new crate which is responsible for all logging macros and logging implementation. A few reasons for this change are: * The crate map has always been a bit of a code smell among rust programs. It has difficulty being loaded on almost all platforms, and it's used almost exclusively for logging and only logging. Removing the crate map is one of the end goals of this movement. * The compiler has a fair bit of special support for logging. It has the __log_level() expression as well as generating a global word per module specifying the log level. This is unfairly favoring the built-in logging system, and is much better done purely in libraries instead of the compiler itself. * Initialization of logging is much easier to do if there is no reliance on a magical crate map being available to set module log levels. * If the logging library can be written outside of the standard library, there's no reason that it shouldn't be. It's likely that we're not going to build the highest quality logging library of all time, so third-party libraries should be able to provide just as high-quality logging systems as the default one provided in the rust distribution. With a migration such as this, the change does not come for free. There are some subtle changes in the behavior of liblog vs the previous logging macros: * The core change of this migration is that there is no longer a physical log-level per module. This concept is still emulated (it is quite useful), but there is now only a global log level, not a local one. This global log level is a reflection of the maximum of all log levels specified. The previously generated logging code looked like: if specified_level <= __module_log_level() { println!(...) } The newly generated code looks like: if specified_level <= ::log::LOG_LEVEL { if ::log::module_enabled(module_path!()) { println!(...) } } Notably, the first layer of checking is still intended to be "super fast" in that it's just a load of a global word and a compare. The second layer of checking is executed to determine if the current module does indeed have logging turned on. This means that if any module has a debug log level turned on, all modules with debug log levels get a little bit slower (they all do more expensive dynamic checks to determine if they're turned on or not). Semantically, this migration brings no change in this respect, but runtime-wise, this will have a perf impact on some code. * A `RUST_LOG=::help` directive will no longer print out a list of all modules that can be logged. This is because the crate map will no longer specify the log levels of all modules, so the list of modules is not known. Additionally, warnings can no longer be provided if a malformed logging directive was supplied. The new "hello world" for logging looks like: #[phase(syntax, link)] extern crate log; fn main() { debug!("Hello, world!"); } 2014-03-09 06:11:44 +00:00			`pub fn bar() { println!("foo"); }`
Add or enable some tests. 2011-01-13 23:02:54 +00:00			`}`
			`}`

check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtree 2013-02-02 03:43:17 +00:00			`pub fn main() { bar(); }`