nordic-dev.net/rust
nordic-dev.net/rust
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git synced 2024-12-18 03:25:55 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
d0941f92d7
rust/tests/ui/privacy/issue-79593.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

36 lines
1011 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Resolve enum field visibility correctly Previously, this code treated enum fields' visibility as if they were struct fields. However, that's not correct because the visibility of a struct field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is private to the module it's defined in, whereas the visibility of an *enum* field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is the visibility of the enum it belongs to.
2020-12-12 03:52:51 +00:00
error[E0063]: missing field `private` in initializer of `Pub`
--> $DIR/issue-79593.rs:10:9
|
LL | Pub {};
| ^^^ missing `private`
error[E0063]: missing field `y` in initializer of `Enum`
--> $DIR/issue-79593.rs:12:9
|
LL | Enum::Variant { x: () };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `y`
point at private fields in struct literal
2022-06-20 07:29:05 +00:00
error: cannot construct `Pub` with struct literal syntax due to private fields
Resolve enum field visibility correctly Previously, this code treated enum fields' visibility as if they were struct fields. However, that's not correct because the visibility of a struct field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is private to the module it's defined in, whereas the visibility of an *enum* field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is the visibility of the enum it belongs to.
2020-12-12 03:52:51 +00:00
--> $DIR/issue-79593.rs:18:5
|
LL | foo::Pub {};
| ^^^^^^^^
point at private fields in struct literal
2022-06-20 07:29:05 +00:00
|
Tweak message on ADT with private fields building When trying to create an inaccessible ADT due to private fields, handle the case when no fields were passed. ``` error: cannot construct `Foo` with struct literal syntax due to private fields --> $DIR/issue-76077.rs:8:5 | LL | foo::Foo {}; | ^^^^^^^^ | = note: private field `you_cant_use_this_field` that was not provided ```
2023-11-29 18:11:57 +00:00
= note: private field `private` that was not provided
Resolve enum field visibility correctly Previously, this code treated enum fields' visibility as if they were struct fields. However, that's not correct because the visibility of a struct field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is private to the module it's defined in, whereas the visibility of an *enum* field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is the visibility of the enum it belongs to.
2020-12-12 03:52:51 +00:00
error[E0063]: missing field `y` in initializer of `Enum`
--> $DIR/issue-79593.rs:23:5
|
LL | foo::Enum::Variant { x: () };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `y`
Make "missing field" error message more natural
2021-02-20 17:32:02 +00:00
error[E0063]: missing fields `x` and `y` in initializer of `Enum`
Resolve enum field visibility correctly Previously, this code treated enum fields' visibility as if they were struct fields. However, that's not correct because the visibility of a struct field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is private to the module it's defined in, whereas the visibility of an *enum* field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is the visibility of the enum it belongs to.
2020-12-12 03:52:51 +00:00
--> $DIR/issue-79593.rs:25:5
|
LL | foo::Enum::Variant { };
Make "missing field" error message more natural
2021-02-20 17:32:02 +00:00
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `x` and `y`
Resolve enum field visibility correctly Previously, this code treated enum fields' visibility as if they were struct fields. However, that's not correct because the visibility of a struct field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is private to the module it's defined in, whereas the visibility of an *enum* field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is the visibility of the enum it belongs to.
2020-12-12 03:52:51 +00:00
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0063`.
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink