rust/tests/ui/issues/issue-18532.stderr

error[E0618]: expected function, found `!`
  --> $DIR/issue-18532.rs:6:5
   |
LL |     (return)((),());
   |     ^^^^^^^^-------
   |     |
   |     call expression requires function

error: aborting due to 1 previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0618`.
Move some `compile-fail` tests to `ui` 2018-07-15 21:11:54 +00:00			error[E0618]: expected function, found `!`
Remove licenses 2018-12-25 15:56:47 +00:00			`--> $DIR/issue-18532.rs:6:5`
Move some `compile-fail` tests to `ui` 2018-07-15 21:11:54 +00:00			`\|`
Update tests 2019-03-09 12:03:44 +00:00			`LL \| (return)((),());`
in which the E0618 "expected function" diagnostic gets a makeover Now the main span focuses on the erroneous not-a-function callee, while showing the entire call expression is relegated to a secondary span. In the case where the erroneous callee is itself a call, we point out the definition, and, if the call expression spans multiple lines, tentatively suggest a semicolon (because we suspect that the "outer" call is actually supposed to be a tuple). The new `bug!` assertion is, in fact, safe (`confirm_builtin_call` is only called by `check_call`, which is only called with a first arg of kind `ExprKind::Call` in `check_expr_kind`). Resolves #51055. 2018-11-11 04:46:05 +00:00			`\| ^^^^^^^^-------`
			`\| \|`
			`\| call expression requires function`
Move some `compile-fail` tests to `ui` 2018-07-15 21:11:54 +00:00
Show number in error message even for one error Co-authored-by: Adrian <adrian.iosdev@gmail.com> 2023-11-21 15:44:16 +00:00			`error: aborting due to 1 previous error`
Move some `compile-fail` tests to `ui` 2018-07-15 21:11:54 +00:00
			For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0618`.