rust/tests/ui/issues/issue-11552.rs

// run-pass
#![feature(box_patterns)]

#[derive(Clone)]
enum Noun
{
    Atom(isize),
    Cell(Box<Noun>, Box<Noun>)
}

fn fas(n: &Noun) -> Noun
{
    match n {
        &Noun::Cell(box Noun::Atom(2), box Noun::Cell(ref a, _)) => (**a).clone(),
        _ => panic!("Invalid fas pattern")
    }
}

pub fn main() {
    fas(
        &Noun::Cell(Box::new(Noun::Atom(2)),
        Box::new(Noun::Cell(Box::new(Noun::Atom(2)), Box::new(Noun::Atom(3)))))
    );
}
Add `// run-pass` annotations to all the tests under `ui/run-pass/`. (I may have accidentally added it to some auxilliary crates as well; my emacs-macro-based methodology was pretty crude.) 2018-08-30 12:18:55 +00:00			`// run-pass`
Opt into `box_patterns` feature gate in all tests that use them. 2015-02-10 21:52:00 +00:00			`#![feature(box_patterns)]`
librustc: Remove `~EXPR`, `~TYPE`, and `~PAT` from the language, except for `~str`/`~[]`. Note that `~self` still remains, since I forgot to add support for `Box<self>` before the snapshot. How to update your code: * Instead of `~EXPR`, you should write `box EXPR`. * Instead of `~TYPE`, you should write `Box<Type>`. * Instead of `~PATTERN`, you should write `box PATTERN`. [breaking-change] 2014-05-06 01:56:44 +00:00
Use `derive` rather than `deriving` in tests 2014-12-31 04:32:49 +00:00			`#[derive(Clone)]`
Add a test for #11552 Closes #11552 2014-03-01 06:05:49 +00:00			`enum Noun`
			`{`
Mass rename uint/int to usize/isize Now that support has been removed, all lingering use cases are renamed. 2015-03-26 00:06:52 +00:00			`Atom(isize),`
librustc: Remove `~EXPR`, `~TYPE`, and `~PAT` from the language, except for `~str`/`~[]`. Note that `~self` still remains, since I forgot to add support for `Box<self>` before the snapshot. How to update your code: * Instead of `~EXPR`, you should write `box EXPR`. * Instead of `~TYPE`, you should write `Box<Type>`. * Instead of `~PATTERN`, you should write `box PATTERN`. [breaking-change] 2014-05-06 01:56:44 +00:00			`Cell(Box<Noun>, Box<Noun>)`
Add a test for #11552 Closes #11552 2014-03-01 06:05:49 +00:00			`}`

			`fn fas(n: &Noun) -> Noun`
			`{`
librustc: Remove `~EXPR`, `~TYPE`, and `~PAT` from the language, except for `~str`/`~[]`. Note that `~self` still remains, since I forgot to add support for `Box<self>` before the snapshot. How to update your code: * Instead of `~EXPR`, you should write `box EXPR`. * Instead of `~TYPE`, you should write `Box<Type>`. * Instead of `~PATTERN`, you should write `box PATTERN`. [breaking-change] 2014-05-06 01:56:44 +00:00			`match n {`
Switch to purely namespaced enums This breaks code that referred to variant names in the same namespace as their enum. Reexport the variants in the old location or alter code to refer to the new locations: ``` pub enum Foo { A, B } fn main() { let a = A; } ``` => ``` pub use self::Foo::{A, B}; pub enum Foo { A, B } fn main() { let a = A; } ``` or ``` pub enum Foo { A, B } fn main() { let a = Foo::A; } ``` [breaking-change] 2014-11-06 08:05:53 +00:00			`&Noun::Cell(box Noun::Atom(2), box Noun::Cell(ref a, _)) => (**a).clone(),`
Rename fail! to panic! https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221 The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other circumlocutions. Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate out a section describing the "Err-producing" case. We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe. To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead. Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this will work on UNIX based systems: grep -lZR 'fail!' . \| xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g' You can of course also do this by hand. [breaking-change] 2014-10-09 19:17:22 +00:00			`_ => panic!("Invalid fas pattern")`
Add a test for #11552 Closes #11552 2014-03-01 06:05:49 +00:00			`}`
			`}`

			`pub fn main() {`
Remove even more box syntax uses from src/test Prior work, notably 6550021124451628b1efc60c59284465b109e3aa from #88316 has removed box syntax from most of the testsuite. However, some tests were left out. This commit removes box_syntax uses from more locations in src/test. Some tests that are very box syntax specific are not being migrated. 2022-07-07 02:36:10 +00:00			`fas(`
			`&Noun::Cell(Box::new(Noun::Atom(2)),`
			`Box::new(Noun::Cell(Box::new(Noun::Atom(2)), Box::new(Noun::Atom(3)))))`
			`);`
Add a test for #11552 Closes #11552 2014-03-01 06:05:49 +00:00			`}`