rust/tests/ui/for-loop-while/loop-label-shadowing.rs

//@ run-pass
// Issue #12512.

//@ pretty-expanded FIXME #23616

fn main() {
    let mut foo = Vec::new();
    #[allow(unused_labels)]
    'foo: for i in &[1, 2, 3] {
        foo.push(*i);
    }
}
Add `// run-pass` annotations to all the tests under `ui/run-pass/`. (I may have accidentally added it to some auxilliary crates as well; my emacs-macro-based methodology was pretty crude.) 2018-08-30 12:18:55 +00:00			`//@ run-pass`
librustc: Fix the issue with labels shadowing variable names by making the leading quote part of the identifier for the purposes of hygiene. This adopts @jbclements' solution to #14539. I'm not sure if this is a breaking change or not. Closes #12512. [breaking-change] 2014-06-10 20:54:13 +00:00			`// Issue #12512.`

rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expanded Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile. This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work. 2015-03-22 20:13:15 +00:00			`//@ pretty-expanded FIXME #23616`

librustc: Fix the issue with labels shadowing variable names by making the leading quote part of the identifier for the purposes of hygiene. This adopts @jbclements' solution to #14539. I'm not sure if this is a breaking change or not. Closes #12512. [breaking-change] 2014-06-10 20:54:13 +00:00			`fn main() {`
			`let mut foo = Vec::new();`
Cleaned up unused labels Deleted unused labels from compiler and fixed or allowed unused labels in tests. This patch removes some gratuitous unused labels and turns off the warning for unused labels that are a necessary part of tests. This will permit setting the `unused_labels` lint to `warn`. 2019-11-12 11:19:40 +00:00			`#[allow(unused_labels)]`
`for x in xs.iter()` -> `for x in &xs` 2015-01-31 17:20:46 +00:00			`'foo: for i in &[1, 2, 3] {`
make `for PAT in ITER_EXPR { ... }` a terminating-scope for ITER_EXPR. In effect, temporary anonymous values created during the evaluation of ITER_EXPR no longer not live for the entirety of the block surrounding the for-loop; instead they only live for the extent of the for-loop itself, and no longer. ---- There is one case I know of that this breaks, demonstrated to me by niko (but it is also a corner-case that is useless in practice). Here is that case: ``` fn main() { let mut foo: Vec<&i8> = Vec::new(); for i in &[1, 2, 3] { foo.push(i) } } ``` Note that if you add any code following the for-loop above, or even a semicolon to the end of it, then the code will stop compiling (i.e., it gathers a vector of references but the gathered vector cannot actually be used.) (The above code, despite being useless, did occur in one run-pass test by accident; that test is updated here to accommodate the new striction.) ---- So, technically this is a: [breaking-change] 2015-02-04 12:24:44 +00:00			`foo.push(*i);`
librustc: Fix the issue with labels shadowing variable names by making the leading quote part of the identifier for the purposes of hygiene. This adopts @jbclements' solution to #14539. I'm not sure if this is a breaking change or not. Closes #12512. [breaking-change] 2014-06-10 20:54:13 +00:00			`}`
			`}`