2020-06-19 16:57:15 +00:00
|
|
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&[0_u8..=64_u8, _, _, _]` and `&[66_u8..=u8::MAX, _, _, _]` not covered
|
2018-12-25 15:56:47 +00:00
|
|
|
--> $DIR/match-byte-array-patterns-2.rs:4:11
|
2018-08-08 12:28:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-09 12:03:44 +00:00
|
|
|
LL | match buf {
|
2020-06-19 16:57:15 +00:00
|
|
|
| ^^^ patterns `&[0_u8..=64_u8, _, _, _]` and `&[66_u8..=u8::MAX, _, _, _]` not covered
|
Point at enum definition when match patterns are not exhaustive
```
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: type `X` is non-empty
--> file.rs:9:11
|
1 | / enum X {
2 | | A,
| | - variant not covered
3 | | B,
| | - variant not covered
4 | | C,
| | - variant not covered
5 | | }
| |_- `X` defined here
...
9 | match x {
| ^
|
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered
--> file.rs:11:11
|
1 | / enum X {
2 | | A,
3 | | B,
4 | | C,
| | - not covered
5 | | }
| |_- `X` defined here
...
11 | match x {
| ^ patterns `C` not covered
```
When a match expression doesn't have patterns covering every variant,
point at the enum's definition span. On a best effort basis, point at the
variant(s) that are missing. This does not handle the case when the missing
pattern is due to a field's enum variants:
```
enum E1 {
A,
B,
C,
}
enum E2 {
A(E1),
B,
}
fn foo() {
match E2::A(E1::A) {
E2::A(E1::B) => {}
E2::B => {}
}
//~^ ERROR `E2::A(E1::A)` and `E2::A(E1::C)` not handled
}
```
Unify look between match with no arms and match with some missing patterns.
Fix #37518.
2019-02-10 13:12:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-27 05:44:30 +00:00
|
|
|
= note: the matched value is of type `&[u8; 4]`
|
2021-12-16 02:14:17 +00:00
|
|
|
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LL ~ b"AAAA" => {}
|
|
|
|
|
LL + &[0_u8..=64_u8, _, _, _] | &[66_u8..=u8::MAX, _, _, _] => todo!()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-08 12:28:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-15 13:04:30 +00:00
|
|
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&[]`, `&[_]`, `&[_, _]` and 2 more not covered
|
2018-12-25 15:56:47 +00:00
|
|
|
--> $DIR/match-byte-array-patterns-2.rs:10:11
|
2018-08-08 12:28:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-09 12:03:44 +00:00
|
|
|
LL | match buf {
|
2020-11-15 13:04:30 +00:00
|
|
|
| ^^^ patterns `&[]`, `&[_]`, `&[_, _]` and 2 more not covered
|
Point at enum definition when match patterns are not exhaustive
```
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: type `X` is non-empty
--> file.rs:9:11
|
1 | / enum X {
2 | | A,
| | - variant not covered
3 | | B,
| | - variant not covered
4 | | C,
| | - variant not covered
5 | | }
| |_- `X` defined here
...
9 | match x {
| ^
|
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered
--> file.rs:11:11
|
1 | / enum X {
2 | | A,
3 | | B,
4 | | C,
| | - not covered
5 | | }
| |_- `X` defined here
...
11 | match x {
| ^ patterns `C` not covered
```
When a match expression doesn't have patterns covering every variant,
point at the enum's definition span. On a best effort basis, point at the
variant(s) that are missing. This does not handle the case when the missing
pattern is due to a field's enum variants:
```
enum E1 {
A,
B,
C,
}
enum E2 {
A(E1),
B,
}
fn foo() {
match E2::A(E1::A) {
E2::A(E1::B) => {}
E2::B => {}
}
//~^ ERROR `E2::A(E1::A)` and `E2::A(E1::C)` not handled
}
```
Unify look between match with no arms and match with some missing patterns.
Fix #37518.
2019-02-10 13:12:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-27 05:44:30 +00:00
|
|
|
= note: the matched value is of type `&[u8]`
|
2021-12-16 02:14:17 +00:00
|
|
|
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LL ~ b"AAAA" => {}
|
|
|
|
|
LL + _ => todo!()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-08 12:28:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0004`.
|