nordic-dev.net/rust
nordic-dev.net/rust
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git synced 2024-11-28 01:34:21 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
8fa6984e8e
rust/tests/ui/structs/struct-tuple-field-names.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

42 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Clarify error message and remove pretty printing in help suggestions.
2021-02-14 18:14:11 +00:00
error[E0769]: tuple variant `E::S` written as struct variant
Improve suggestion for tuple struct pattern matching errors. Currently, when a user uses a struct pattern to pattern match on a tuple struct, the errors we emit generally suggest adding fields using their field names, which are numbers. However, numbers are not valid identifiers, so the suggestions, which use the shorthand notation, are not valid syntax. This commit changes those errors to suggest using the actual tuple struct pattern syntax instead, which is a more actionable suggestion.
2021-01-21 02:49:11 +00:00
--> $DIR/struct-tuple-field-names.rs:8:9
|
LL | E::S { 0, 1 } => {}
Fix suggestion span and move suggestions into new subwindow.
2021-02-20 20:33:08 +00:00
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: use the tuple variant pattern syntax instead
|
LL | E::S(_, _) => {}
Modify structured suggestion output * On suggestions that include deletions, use a diff inspired output format * When suggesting addition, use `+` as underline * Color highlight modified span
2021-06-22 02:07:19 +00:00
| ~~~~~~
Improve suggestion for tuple struct pattern matching errors. Currently, when a user uses a struct pattern to pattern match on a tuple struct, the errors we emit generally suggest adding fields using their field names, which are numbers. However, numbers are not valid identifiers, so the suggestions, which use the shorthand notation, are not valid syntax. This commit changes those errors to suggest using the actual tuple struct pattern syntax instead, which is a more actionable suggestion.
2021-01-21 02:49:11 +00:00
error[E0769]: tuple variant `S` written as struct variant
--> $DIR/struct-tuple-field-names.rs:13:9
|
LL | S { } => {}
Fix suggestion span and move suggestions into new subwindow.
2021-02-20 20:33:08 +00:00
| ^^^^^
|
help: use the tuple variant pattern syntax instead
|
LL | S(_, _) => {}
Modify structured suggestion output * On suggestions that include deletions, use a diff inspired output format * When suggesting addition, use `+` as underline * Color highlight modified span
2021-06-22 02:07:19 +00:00
| ~~~~~~
Improve suggestion for tuple struct pattern matching errors. Currently, when a user uses a struct pattern to pattern match on a tuple struct, the errors we emit generally suggest adding fields using their field names, which are numbers. However, numbers are not valid identifiers, so the suggestions, which use the shorthand notation, are not valid syntax. This commit changes those errors to suggest using the actual tuple struct pattern syntax instead, which is a more actionable suggestion.
2021-01-21 02:49:11 +00:00
better diagnostics for pattern matching tuple structs Better diagnostic message when trying to pattern match a tuple struct with a struct pattern.
2023-03-30 08:35:06 +00:00
error[E0027]: pattern does not mention field `1`
--> $DIR/struct-tuple-field-names.rs:16:12
|
LL | if let E::S { 0: a } = x {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing field `1`
|
help: include the missing field in the pattern
|
LL | if let E::S { 0: a, 1: _ } = x {
| ~~~~~~~~
help: if you don't care about this missing field, you can explicitly ignore it
|
LL | if let E::S { 0: a, .. } = x {
| ~~~~~~
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
Improve suggestion for tuple struct pattern matching errors. Currently, when a user uses a struct pattern to pattern match on a tuple struct, the errors we emit generally suggest adding fields using their field names, which are numbers. However, numbers are not valid identifiers, so the suggestions, which use the shorthand notation, are not valid syntax. This commit changes those errors to suggest using the actual tuple struct pattern syntax instead, which is a more actionable suggestion.
2021-01-21 02:49:11 +00:00
better diagnostics for pattern matching tuple structs Better diagnostic message when trying to pattern match a tuple struct with a struct pattern.
2023-03-30 08:35:06 +00:00
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0027, E0769.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0027`.
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink