rust/tests/coverage/if_not.cov-map

Function name: if_not::if_not
Raw bytes (60): 0x[01, 01, 03, 01, 05, 01, 09, 01, 0d, 0a, 01, 05, 01, 03, 0d, 02, 04, 05, 02, 06, 05, 02, 06, 00, 07, 01, 03, 09, 01, 0d, 06, 02, 05, 02, 06, 09, 02, 06, 00, 07, 01, 03, 09, 01, 0d, 0a, 02, 05, 02, 06, 0d, 02, 0c, 02, 06, 01, 03, 01, 00, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 3
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(3)
Number of file 0 mappings: 10
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 5, 1) to (start + 3, 13)
- Code(Expression(0, Sub)) at (prev + 4, 5) to (start + 2, 6)
    = (c0 - c1)
- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 2, 6) to (start + 0, 7)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 9) to (start + 1, 13)
- Code(Expression(1, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 5) to (start + 2, 6)
    = (c0 - c2)
- Code(Counter(2)) at (prev + 2, 6) to (start + 0, 7)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 9) to (start + 1, 13)
- Code(Expression(2, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 5) to (start + 2, 6)
    = (c0 - c3)
- Code(Counter(3)) at (prev + 2, 12) to (start + 2, 6)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
Highest counter ID seen: c3
coverage: Add a dedicated test for coverage of `if !` 2023-11-23 02:52:50 +00:00			`Function name: if_not::if_not`
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions. 2024-05-14 03:51:24 +00:00			`Raw bytes (60): 0x[01, 01, 03, 01, 05, 01, 09, 01, 0d, 0a, 01, 05, 01, 03, 0d, 02, 04, 05, 02, 06, 05, 02, 06, 00, 07, 01, 03, 09, 01, 0d, 06, 02, 05, 02, 06, 09, 02, 06, 00, 07, 01, 03, 09, 01, 0d, 0a, 02, 05, 02, 06, 0d, 02, 0c, 02, 06, 01, 03, 01, 00, 02]`
coverage: Add a dedicated test for coverage of `if !` 2023-11-23 02:52:50 +00:00			`Number of files: 1`
			`- file 0 => global file 1`
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions. 2024-05-14 03:51:24 +00:00			`Number of expressions: 3`
coverage: Add a dedicated test for coverage of `if !` 2023-11-23 02:52:50 +00:00			`- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)`
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions. 2024-05-14 03:51:24 +00:00			`- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(2)`
			`- expression 2 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(3)`
coverage: Add a dedicated test for coverage of `if !` 2023-11-23 02:52:50 +00:00			`Number of file 0 mappings: 10`
coverage: Add `#[rustfmt::skip]` to tests with non-standard formatting These tests deliberately use non-standard formatting, so that the line execution counts reported by `llvm-cov` reveal additional information about where code regions begin and end. 2024-01-16 02:40:01 +00:00			`- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 5, 1) to (start + 3, 13)`
coverage: Add a dedicated test for coverage of `if !` 2023-11-23 02:52:50 +00:00			`- Code(Expression(0, Sub)) at (prev + 4, 5) to (start + 2, 6)`
			`= (c0 - c1)`
			`- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 2, 6) to (start + 0, 7)`
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions. 2024-05-14 03:51:24 +00:00			`- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 9) to (start + 1, 13)`
			`- Code(Expression(1, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 5) to (start + 2, 6)`
			`= (c0 - c2)`
coverage: Add a dedicated test for coverage of `if !` 2023-11-23 02:52:50 +00:00			`- Code(Counter(2)) at (prev + 2, 6) to (start + 0, 7)`
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions. 2024-05-14 03:51:24 +00:00			`- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 9) to (start + 1, 13)`
			`- Code(Expression(2, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 5) to (start + 2, 6)`
			`= (c0 - c3)`
coverage: Add a dedicated test for coverage of `if !` 2023-11-23 02:52:50 +00:00			`- Code(Counter(3)) at (prev + 2, 12) to (start + 2, 6)`
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions. 2024-05-14 03:51:24 +00:00			`- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 0, 2)`
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed. (The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.) 2024-10-08 02:13:05 +00:00			`Highest counter ID seen: c3`
coverage: Add a dedicated test for coverage of `if !` 2023-11-23 02:52:50 +00:00