nordic-dev.net/rust
nordic-dev.net/rust
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git synced 2024-11-23 15:23:46 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
51b275bff8
rust/tests/rustdoc/structfields.rs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

45 lines
975 B
Rust
Raw Normal View History

Add generate-old-style-files option to rustdoc
2018-12-11 23:33:00 +00:00
// @has structfields/struct.Foo.html
Refactor `HiddenStructField` into `StrippedItem`
2016-04-02 06:17:59 +00:00
pub struct Foo {
// @has - //pre "pub a: ()"
pub a: (),
Display "private fields" instead of "fields omitted" Also: * Always use `/* */` block comments * Use the same message everywhere, rather than sometimes prefixing with "some" When I first read rustdoc docs, I was confused why the fields were being omitted. It was only later that I realized it was because they were private. It's also always bothered me that rustdoc sometimes uses `//` and sometimes uses `/*` comments for these messages, so this change makes them all use `/*`. Technically, I think fields can be omitted if they are public but `doc(hidden)` too, but `doc(hidden)` is analogous to privacy. It's really just used to emulate "doc privacy" when -- because of technical limitations -- an item has to be public. So I think it's fine to include this under the category of "private fields".
2022-01-09 20:41:13 +00:00
// @has - //pre "/* private fields */"
Refactor `HiddenStructField` into `StrippedItem`
2016-04-02 06:17:59 +00:00
// @!has - //pre "b: ()"
b: (),
// @!has - //pre "c: usize"
#[doc(hidden)]
c: usize,
// @has - //pre "pub d: usize"
pub d: usize,
}
// @has structfields/struct.Bar.html
pub struct Bar {
// @has - //pre "pub a: ()"
pub a: (),
Display "private fields" instead of "fields omitted" Also: * Always use `/* */` block comments * Use the same message everywhere, rather than sometimes prefixing with "some" When I first read rustdoc docs, I was confused why the fields were being omitted. It was only later that I realized it was because they were private. It's also always bothered me that rustdoc sometimes uses `//` and sometimes uses `/*` comments for these messages, so this change makes them all use `/*`. Technically, I think fields can be omitted if they are public but `doc(hidden)` too, but `doc(hidden)` is analogous to privacy. It's really just used to emulate "doc privacy" when -- because of technical limitations -- an item has to be public. So I think it's fine to include this under the category of "private fields".
2022-01-09 20:41:13 +00:00
// @!has - //pre "/* private fields */"
Refactor `HiddenStructField` into `StrippedItem`
2016-04-02 06:17:59 +00:00
}
// @has structfields/enum.Qux.html
pub enum Qux {
Quz {
// @has - //pre "a: ()"
a: (),
// @!has - //pre "b: ()"
#[doc(hidden)]
b: (),
// @has - //pre "c: usize"
c: usize,
Display "private fields" instead of "fields omitted" Also: * Always use `/* */` block comments * Use the same message everywhere, rather than sometimes prefixing with "some" When I first read rustdoc docs, I was confused why the fields were being omitted. It was only later that I realized it was because they were private. It's also always bothered me that rustdoc sometimes uses `//` and sometimes uses `/*` comments for these messages, so this change makes them all use `/*`. Technically, I think fields can be omitted if they are public but `doc(hidden)` too, but `doc(hidden)` is analogous to privacy. It's really just used to emulate "doc privacy" when -- because of technical limitations -- an item has to be public. So I think it's fine to include this under the category of "private fields".
2022-01-09 20:41:13 +00:00
// @has - //pre "/* private fields */"
Refactor `HiddenStructField` into `StrippedItem`
2016-04-02 06:17:59 +00:00
},
}
rustdoc: Don't add extra newlines for fully opaque structs Changes the definition for opaque structs to look like `pub struct Vec<T> { /* fields omitted */ }` to save space on the page. Also only use one line for empty braced structs.
2016-08-14 17:01:25 +00:00
Display "private fields" instead of "fields omitted" Also: * Always use `/* */` block comments * Use the same message everywhere, rather than sometimes prefixing with "some" When I first read rustdoc docs, I was confused why the fields were being omitted. It was only later that I realized it was because they were private. It's also always bothered me that rustdoc sometimes uses `//` and sometimes uses `/*` comments for these messages, so this change makes them all use `/*`. Technically, I think fields can be omitted if they are public but `doc(hidden)` too, but `doc(hidden)` is analogous to privacy. It's really just used to emulate "doc privacy" when -- because of technical limitations -- an item has to be public. So I think it's fine to include this under the category of "private fields".
2022-01-09 20:41:13 +00:00
// @has structfields/struct.Baz.html //pre "pub struct Baz { /* private fields */ }"
rustdoc: Don't add extra newlines for fully opaque structs Changes the definition for opaque structs to look like `pub struct Vec<T> { /* fields omitted */ }` to save space on the page. Also only use one line for empty braced structs.
2016-08-14 17:01:25 +00:00
pub struct Baz {
x: u8,
#[doc(hidden)]
pub y: u8,
}
// @has structfields/struct.Quux.html //pre "pub struct Quux {}"
pub struct Quux {}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink