rust/tests/ui/issues/issue-17800.stderr

error[E0769]: tuple variant `MyOption::MySome` written as struct variant
  --> $DIR/issue-17800.rs:8:9
   |
LL |         MyOption::MySome { x: 42 } => (),
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
help: use the tuple variant pattern syntax instead
   |
LL |         MyOption::MySome(42) => (),
   |                         ~~~~

error: aborting due to 1 previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0769`.
Tweak conditions for E0026 and E0769 When we have a tuple struct used with struct we don't want to suggest using the (valid) struct syntax with numeric field names. Instead we want to suggest the expected syntax. Given ```rust fn main() { match MyOption::MySome(42) { MyOption::MySome { x: 42 } => (), _ => (), } } ``` We now emit E0769 "tuple variant `MyOption::MySome` written as struct variant" instead of E0026 "variant `MyOption::MySome` does not have a field named `x`". 2020-08-09 23:56:47 +00:00			error[E0769]: tuple variant `MyOption::MySome` written as struct variant
			`--> $DIR/issue-17800.rs:8:9`
Move some `compile-fail` tests to `ui` 2018-07-15 21:11:54 +00:00			`\|`
			`LL \| MyOption::MySome { x: 42 } => (),`
Fix suggestion span and move suggestions into new subwindow. 2021-02-20 20:33:08 +00:00			`\| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^`
			`\|`
			`help: use the tuple variant pattern syntax instead`
			`\|`
			`LL \| MyOption::MySome(42) => (),`
Modify structured suggestion output * On suggestions that include deletions, use a diff inspired output format * When suggesting addition, use `+` as underline * Color highlight modified span 2021-06-22 02:07:19 +00:00			`\| ~~~~`
Move some `compile-fail` tests to `ui` 2018-07-15 21:11:54 +00:00
Show number in error message even for one error Co-authored-by: Adrian <adrian.iosdev@gmail.com> 2023-11-21 15:44:16 +00:00			`error: aborting due to 1 previous error`
Move some `compile-fail` tests to `ui` 2018-07-15 21:11:54 +00:00
Tweak conditions for E0026 and E0769 When we have a tuple struct used with struct we don't want to suggest using the (valid) struct syntax with numeric field names. Instead we want to suggest the expected syntax. Given ```rust fn main() { match MyOption::MySome(42) { MyOption::MySome { x: 42 } => (), _ => (), } } ``` We now emit E0769 "tuple variant `MyOption::MySome` written as struct variant" instead of E0026 "variant `MyOption::MySome` does not have a field named `x`". 2020-08-09 23:56:47 +00:00			For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0769`.