rust/tests/ui/higher-rank-trait-bounds/hrtb-cache-issue-54302.stderr

error: implementation of `Deserialize` is not general enough
  --> $DIR/hrtb-cache-issue-54302.rs:19:5
   |
LL |     assert_deserialize_owned::<&'static str>();
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ implementation of `Deserialize` is not general enough
   |
   = note: `&'static str` must implement `Deserialize<'0>`, for any lifetime `'0`...
   = note: ...but `&str` actually implements `Deserialize<'1>`, for some specific lifetime `'1`

error: aborting due to previous error
apply the new placeholder errors even with just one placeholder 2018-11-18 18:25:53 +00:00			error: implementation of `Deserialize` is not general enough
make evaluation track whether outlives relationships mattered Previously, evaluation ignored outlives relationships. Since we using evaluation to skip the "normal" trait selection (which enforces outlives relationships) this led to incorrect results in some cases. 2018-09-20 17:56:11 +00:00			`--> $DIR/hrtb-cache-issue-54302.rs:19:5`
			`\|`
Update tests 2019-03-09 12:03:44 +00:00			`LL \| assert_deserialize_owned::<&'static str>();`
Tweak unsatisfied HRTB errors 2019-09-02 04:51:16 +00:00			\| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ implementation of `Deserialize` is not general enough
make evaluation track whether outlives relationships mattered Previously, evaluation ignored outlives relationships. Since we using evaluation to skip the "normal" trait selection (which enforces outlives relationships) this led to incorrect results in some cases. 2018-09-20 17:56:11 +00:00			`\|`
Tweak unsatisfied HRTB errors 2019-09-02 04:51:16 +00:00			= note: `&'static str` must implement `Deserialize<'0>`, for any lifetime `'0`...
			= note: ...but `&str` actually implements `Deserialize<'1>`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
make evaluation track whether outlives relationships mattered Previously, evaluation ignored outlives relationships. Since we using evaluation to skip the "normal" trait selection (which enforces outlives relationships) this led to incorrect results in some cases. 2018-09-20 17:56:11 +00:00
			`error: aborting due to previous error`