rust/tests/ui/deriving/deriving-eq-ord-boxed-slice.rs

// run-pass
#[derive(PartialEq, PartialOrd, Eq, Ord, Debug)]
struct Foo(Box<[u8]>);

pub fn main() {
    let a = Foo(Box::new([0, 1, 2]));
    let b = Foo(Box::new([0, 1, 2]));
    assert_eq!(a, b);
    println!("{}", a != b);
    println!("{}", a < b);
    println!("{}", a <= b);
    println!("{}", a == b);
    println!("{}", a > b);
    println!("{}", a >= b);
}
Add `// run-pass` annotations to all the tests under `ui/run-pass/`. (I may have accidentally added it to some auxilliary crates as well; my emacs-macro-based methodology was pretty crude.) 2018-08-30 12:18:55 +00:00			`// run-pass`
Use `assert_eq!` instead of `assert!` in tests 2015-06-07 18:00:38 +00:00			`#[derive(PartialEq, PartialOrd, Eq, Ord, Debug)]`
DSTify Box<T> implementation of PartialEq, PartialOrd, Eq, Ord 2014-10-30 20:33:47 +00:00			`struct Foo(Box<[u8]>);`

			`pub fn main() {`
Switched to Box::new in many places. Many of the modifications putting in `Box::new` calls also include a pointer to Issue 22405, which tracks going back to `box <expr>` if possible in the future. (Still tried to use `Box<_>` where it sufficed; thus some tests still have `box_syntax` enabled, as they use a mix of `box` and `Box::new`.) Precursor for overloaded-`box` and placement-`in`; see Issue 22181. 2015-02-15 08:52:21 +00:00			`let a = Foo(Box::new([0, 1, 2]));`
			`let b = Foo(Box::new([0, 1, 2]));`
Use `assert_eq!` instead of `assert!` in tests 2015-06-07 18:00:38 +00:00			`assert_eq!(a, b);`
DSTify Box<T> implementation of PartialEq, PartialOrd, Eq, Ord 2014-10-30 20:33:47 +00:00			`println!("{}", a != b);`
			`println!("{}", a < b);`
			`println!("{}", a <= b);`
			`println!("{}", a == b);`
			`println!("{}", a > b);`
			`println!("{}", a >= b);`
			`}`