rust/tests/rustdoc-ui/intra-doc/reference-links.stderr

error: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman`
  --> $DIR/reference-links.rs:5:10
   |
LL | //! [a]: std::process::Comman
   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process`
   |
note: the lint level is defined here
  --> $DIR/reference-links.rs:2:9
   |
LL | #![deny(rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)]
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: aborting due to 1 previous error
Revert "Cleanup markdown span handling" This caused a diagnostic regression, originally it was: ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:3:10 \| 3 \| //! [a]: std::process::Comman \| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` \| = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` but after that PR rustdoc now displays ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:1:14 \| 1 \| //! Links to [a] [link][a] \| ^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` \| = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` which IMO is much less clear. 2020-12-26 14:47:11 +00:00			error: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman`
			`--> $DIR/reference-links.rs:5:10`
			`\|`
			`LL \| //! [a]: std::process::Comman`
			\| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process`
			`\|`
			`note: the lint level is defined here`
			`--> $DIR/reference-links.rs:2:9`
			`\|`
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does not suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid. 2020-12-30 04:16:16 +00:00			`LL \| #![deny(rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)]`
			`\| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^`
Revert "Cleanup markdown span handling" This caused a diagnostic regression, originally it was: ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:3:10 \| 3 \| //! [a]: std::process::Comman \| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` \| = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` but after that PR rustdoc now displays ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:1:14 \| 1 \| //! Links to [a] [link][a] \| ^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` \| = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` which IMO is much less clear. 2020-12-26 14:47:11 +00:00
Bless rustdoc-ui tests Co-authored-by: Adrian <adrian.iosdev@gmail.com> 2023-11-21 16:44:51 +00:00			`error: aborting due to 1 previous error`
Revert "Cleanup markdown span handling" This caused a diagnostic regression, originally it was: ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:3:10 \| 3 \| //! [a]: std::process::Comman \| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` \| = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` but after that PR rustdoc now displays ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:1:14 \| 1 \| //! Links to [a] [link][a] \| ^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` \| = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` which IMO is much less clear. 2020-12-26 14:47:11 +00:00