rust/compiler/rustc_expand/src/proc_macro.rs

148 lines
5.1 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use crate::base::{self, *};
use crate::proc_macro_server;
use rustc_ast as ast;
use rustc_ast::ptr::P;
2020-07-01 10:16:49 +00:00
use rustc_ast::token;
use rustc_ast::tokenstream::{CanSynthesizeMissingTokens, TokenStream, TokenTree};
use rustc_data_structures::sync::Lrc;
use rustc_errors::ErrorReported;
use rustc_parse::nt_to_tokenstream;
use rustc_parse::parser::ForceCollect;
Implement span quoting for proc-macros This PR implements span quoting, allowing proc-macros to produce spans pointing *into their own crate*. This is used by the unstable `proc_macro::quote!` macro, allowing us to get error messages like this: ``` error[E0412]: cannot find type `MissingType` in this scope --> $DIR/auxiliary/span-from-proc-macro.rs:37:20 | LL | pub fn error_from_attribute(_args: TokenStream, _input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream { | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this expansion of procedural macro `#[error_from_attribute]` ... LL | field: MissingType | ^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in this scope | ::: $DIR/span-from-proc-macro.rs:8:1 | LL | #[error_from_attribute] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation ``` Here, `MissingType` occurs inside the implementation of the proc-macro `#[error_from_attribute]`. Previosuly, this would always result in a span pointing at `#[error_from_attribute]` This will make many proc-macro-related error message much more useful - when a proc-macro generates code containing an error, users will get an error message pointing directly at that code (within the macro definition), instead of always getting a span pointing at the macro invocation site. This is implemented as follows: * When a proc-macro crate is being *compiled*, it causes the `quote!` macro to get run. This saves all of the sapns in the input to `quote!` into the metadata of *the proc-macro-crate* (which we are currently compiling). The `quote!` macro then expands to a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span(id)`, where `id` is an opaque identifier for the span in the crate metadata. * When the same proc-macro crate is *run* (e.g. it is loaded from disk and invoked by some consumer crate), the call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span` causes us to load the span from the proc-macro crate's metadata. The proc-macro then produces a `TokenStream` containing a `Span` pointing into the proc-macro crate itself. The recursive nature of 'quote!' can be difficult to understand at first. The file `src/test/ui/proc-macro/quote-debug.stdout` shows the output of the `quote!` macro, which should make this eaier to understand. This PR also supports custom quoting spans in custom quote macros (e.g. the `quote` crate). All span quoting goes through the `proc_macro::quote_span` method, which can be called by a custom quote macro to perform span quoting. An example of this usage is provided in `src/test/ui/proc-macro/auxiliary/custom-quote.rs` Custom quoting currently has a few limitations: In order to quote a span, we need to generate a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`. However, proc-macros support renaming the `proc_macro` crate, so we can't simply hardcode this path. Previously, the `quote_span` method used the path `crate::Span` - however, this only works when it is called by the builtin `quote!` macro in the same crate. To support being called from arbitrary crates, we need access to the name of the `proc_macro` crate to generate a path. This PR adds an additional argument to `quote_span` to specify the name of the `proc_macro` crate. Howver, this feels kind of hacky, and we may want to change this before stabilizing anything quote-related. Additionally, using `quote_span` currently requires enabling the `proc_macro_internals` feature. The builtin `quote!` macro has an `#[allow_internal_unstable]` attribute, but this won't work for custom quote implementations. This will likely require some additional tricks to apply `allow_internal_unstable` to the span of `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`.
2020-08-02 23:52:16 +00:00
use rustc_span::def_id::CrateNum;
use rustc_span::{Span, DUMMY_SP};
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
const EXEC_STRATEGY: pm::bridge::server::SameThread = pm::bridge::server::SameThread;
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
pub struct BangProcMacro {
2019-12-22 22:42:04 +00:00
pub client: pm::bridge::client::Client<fn(pm::TokenStream) -> pm::TokenStream>,
Implement span quoting for proc-macros This PR implements span quoting, allowing proc-macros to produce spans pointing *into their own crate*. This is used by the unstable `proc_macro::quote!` macro, allowing us to get error messages like this: ``` error[E0412]: cannot find type `MissingType` in this scope --> $DIR/auxiliary/span-from-proc-macro.rs:37:20 | LL | pub fn error_from_attribute(_args: TokenStream, _input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream { | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this expansion of procedural macro `#[error_from_attribute]` ... LL | field: MissingType | ^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in this scope | ::: $DIR/span-from-proc-macro.rs:8:1 | LL | #[error_from_attribute] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation ``` Here, `MissingType` occurs inside the implementation of the proc-macro `#[error_from_attribute]`. Previosuly, this would always result in a span pointing at `#[error_from_attribute]` This will make many proc-macro-related error message much more useful - when a proc-macro generates code containing an error, users will get an error message pointing directly at that code (within the macro definition), instead of always getting a span pointing at the macro invocation site. This is implemented as follows: * When a proc-macro crate is being *compiled*, it causes the `quote!` macro to get run. This saves all of the sapns in the input to `quote!` into the metadata of *the proc-macro-crate* (which we are currently compiling). The `quote!` macro then expands to a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span(id)`, where `id` is an opaque identifier for the span in the crate metadata. * When the same proc-macro crate is *run* (e.g. it is loaded from disk and invoked by some consumer crate), the call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span` causes us to load the span from the proc-macro crate's metadata. The proc-macro then produces a `TokenStream` containing a `Span` pointing into the proc-macro crate itself. The recursive nature of 'quote!' can be difficult to understand at first. The file `src/test/ui/proc-macro/quote-debug.stdout` shows the output of the `quote!` macro, which should make this eaier to understand. This PR also supports custom quoting spans in custom quote macros (e.g. the `quote` crate). All span quoting goes through the `proc_macro::quote_span` method, which can be called by a custom quote macro to perform span quoting. An example of this usage is provided in `src/test/ui/proc-macro/auxiliary/custom-quote.rs` Custom quoting currently has a few limitations: In order to quote a span, we need to generate a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`. However, proc-macros support renaming the `proc_macro` crate, so we can't simply hardcode this path. Previously, the `quote_span` method used the path `crate::Span` - however, this only works when it is called by the builtin `quote!` macro in the same crate. To support being called from arbitrary crates, we need access to the name of the `proc_macro` crate to generate a path. This PR adds an additional argument to `quote_span` to specify the name of the `proc_macro` crate. Howver, this feels kind of hacky, and we may want to change this before stabilizing anything quote-related. Additionally, using `quote_span` currently requires enabling the `proc_macro_internals` feature. The builtin `quote!` macro has an `#[allow_internal_unstable]` attribute, but this won't work for custom quote implementations. This will likely require some additional tricks to apply `allow_internal_unstable` to the span of `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`.
2020-08-02 23:52:16 +00:00
pub krate: CrateNum,
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
}
impl base::ProcMacro for BangProcMacro {
2019-12-22 22:42:04 +00:00
fn expand<'cx>(
&self,
ecx: &'cx mut ExtCtxt<'_>,
span: Span,
input: TokenStream,
2020-03-17 09:09:18 +00:00
) -> Result<TokenStream, ErrorReported> {
Implement span quoting for proc-macros This PR implements span quoting, allowing proc-macros to produce spans pointing *into their own crate*. This is used by the unstable `proc_macro::quote!` macro, allowing us to get error messages like this: ``` error[E0412]: cannot find type `MissingType` in this scope --> $DIR/auxiliary/span-from-proc-macro.rs:37:20 | LL | pub fn error_from_attribute(_args: TokenStream, _input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream { | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this expansion of procedural macro `#[error_from_attribute]` ... LL | field: MissingType | ^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in this scope | ::: $DIR/span-from-proc-macro.rs:8:1 | LL | #[error_from_attribute] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation ``` Here, `MissingType` occurs inside the implementation of the proc-macro `#[error_from_attribute]`. Previosuly, this would always result in a span pointing at `#[error_from_attribute]` This will make many proc-macro-related error message much more useful - when a proc-macro generates code containing an error, users will get an error message pointing directly at that code (within the macro definition), instead of always getting a span pointing at the macro invocation site. This is implemented as follows: * When a proc-macro crate is being *compiled*, it causes the `quote!` macro to get run. This saves all of the sapns in the input to `quote!` into the metadata of *the proc-macro-crate* (which we are currently compiling). The `quote!` macro then expands to a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span(id)`, where `id` is an opaque identifier for the span in the crate metadata. * When the same proc-macro crate is *run* (e.g. it is loaded from disk and invoked by some consumer crate), the call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span` causes us to load the span from the proc-macro crate's metadata. The proc-macro then produces a `TokenStream` containing a `Span` pointing into the proc-macro crate itself. The recursive nature of 'quote!' can be difficult to understand at first. The file `src/test/ui/proc-macro/quote-debug.stdout` shows the output of the `quote!` macro, which should make this eaier to understand. This PR also supports custom quoting spans in custom quote macros (e.g. the `quote` crate). All span quoting goes through the `proc_macro::quote_span` method, which can be called by a custom quote macro to perform span quoting. An example of this usage is provided in `src/test/ui/proc-macro/auxiliary/custom-quote.rs` Custom quoting currently has a few limitations: In order to quote a span, we need to generate a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`. However, proc-macros support renaming the `proc_macro` crate, so we can't simply hardcode this path. Previously, the `quote_span` method used the path `crate::Span` - however, this only works when it is called by the builtin `quote!` macro in the same crate. To support being called from arbitrary crates, we need access to the name of the `proc_macro` crate to generate a path. This PR adds an additional argument to `quote_span` to specify the name of the `proc_macro` crate. Howver, this feels kind of hacky, and we may want to change this before stabilizing anything quote-related. Additionally, using `quote_span` currently requires enabling the `proc_macro_internals` feature. The builtin `quote!` macro has an `#[allow_internal_unstable]` attribute, but this won't work for custom quote implementations. This will likely require some additional tricks to apply `allow_internal_unstable` to the span of `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`.
2020-08-02 23:52:16 +00:00
let server = proc_macro_server::Rustc::new(ecx, self.krate);
self.client.run(&EXEC_STRATEGY, server, input, ecx.ecfg.proc_macro_backtrace).map_err(|e| {
2020-03-17 09:09:18 +00:00
let mut err = ecx.struct_span_err(span, "proc macro panicked");
if let Some(s) = e.as_str() {
err.help(&format!("message: {}", s));
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
}
2020-03-17 09:09:18 +00:00
err.emit();
ErrorReported
})
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
}
}
pub struct AttrProcMacro {
pub client: pm::bridge::client::Client<fn(pm::TokenStream, pm::TokenStream) -> pm::TokenStream>,
Implement span quoting for proc-macros This PR implements span quoting, allowing proc-macros to produce spans pointing *into their own crate*. This is used by the unstable `proc_macro::quote!` macro, allowing us to get error messages like this: ``` error[E0412]: cannot find type `MissingType` in this scope --> $DIR/auxiliary/span-from-proc-macro.rs:37:20 | LL | pub fn error_from_attribute(_args: TokenStream, _input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream { | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this expansion of procedural macro `#[error_from_attribute]` ... LL | field: MissingType | ^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in this scope | ::: $DIR/span-from-proc-macro.rs:8:1 | LL | #[error_from_attribute] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation ``` Here, `MissingType` occurs inside the implementation of the proc-macro `#[error_from_attribute]`. Previosuly, this would always result in a span pointing at `#[error_from_attribute]` This will make many proc-macro-related error message much more useful - when a proc-macro generates code containing an error, users will get an error message pointing directly at that code (within the macro definition), instead of always getting a span pointing at the macro invocation site. This is implemented as follows: * When a proc-macro crate is being *compiled*, it causes the `quote!` macro to get run. This saves all of the sapns in the input to `quote!` into the metadata of *the proc-macro-crate* (which we are currently compiling). The `quote!` macro then expands to a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span(id)`, where `id` is an opaque identifier for the span in the crate metadata. * When the same proc-macro crate is *run* (e.g. it is loaded from disk and invoked by some consumer crate), the call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span` causes us to load the span from the proc-macro crate's metadata. The proc-macro then produces a `TokenStream` containing a `Span` pointing into the proc-macro crate itself. The recursive nature of 'quote!' can be difficult to understand at first. The file `src/test/ui/proc-macro/quote-debug.stdout` shows the output of the `quote!` macro, which should make this eaier to understand. This PR also supports custom quoting spans in custom quote macros (e.g. the `quote` crate). All span quoting goes through the `proc_macro::quote_span` method, which can be called by a custom quote macro to perform span quoting. An example of this usage is provided in `src/test/ui/proc-macro/auxiliary/custom-quote.rs` Custom quoting currently has a few limitations: In order to quote a span, we need to generate a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`. However, proc-macros support renaming the `proc_macro` crate, so we can't simply hardcode this path. Previously, the `quote_span` method used the path `crate::Span` - however, this only works when it is called by the builtin `quote!` macro in the same crate. To support being called from arbitrary crates, we need access to the name of the `proc_macro` crate to generate a path. This PR adds an additional argument to `quote_span` to specify the name of the `proc_macro` crate. Howver, this feels kind of hacky, and we may want to change this before stabilizing anything quote-related. Additionally, using `quote_span` currently requires enabling the `proc_macro_internals` feature. The builtin `quote!` macro has an `#[allow_internal_unstable]` attribute, but this won't work for custom quote implementations. This will likely require some additional tricks to apply `allow_internal_unstable` to the span of `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`.
2020-08-02 23:52:16 +00:00
pub krate: CrateNum,
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
}
impl base::AttrProcMacro for AttrProcMacro {
2019-12-22 22:42:04 +00:00
fn expand<'cx>(
&self,
ecx: &'cx mut ExtCtxt<'_>,
span: Span,
annotation: TokenStream,
annotated: TokenStream,
2020-03-17 09:56:00 +00:00
) -> Result<TokenStream, ErrorReported> {
Implement span quoting for proc-macros This PR implements span quoting, allowing proc-macros to produce spans pointing *into their own crate*. This is used by the unstable `proc_macro::quote!` macro, allowing us to get error messages like this: ``` error[E0412]: cannot find type `MissingType` in this scope --> $DIR/auxiliary/span-from-proc-macro.rs:37:20 | LL | pub fn error_from_attribute(_args: TokenStream, _input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream { | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this expansion of procedural macro `#[error_from_attribute]` ... LL | field: MissingType | ^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in this scope | ::: $DIR/span-from-proc-macro.rs:8:1 | LL | #[error_from_attribute] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation ``` Here, `MissingType` occurs inside the implementation of the proc-macro `#[error_from_attribute]`. Previosuly, this would always result in a span pointing at `#[error_from_attribute]` This will make many proc-macro-related error message much more useful - when a proc-macro generates code containing an error, users will get an error message pointing directly at that code (within the macro definition), instead of always getting a span pointing at the macro invocation site. This is implemented as follows: * When a proc-macro crate is being *compiled*, it causes the `quote!` macro to get run. This saves all of the sapns in the input to `quote!` into the metadata of *the proc-macro-crate* (which we are currently compiling). The `quote!` macro then expands to a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span(id)`, where `id` is an opaque identifier for the span in the crate metadata. * When the same proc-macro crate is *run* (e.g. it is loaded from disk and invoked by some consumer crate), the call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span` causes us to load the span from the proc-macro crate's metadata. The proc-macro then produces a `TokenStream` containing a `Span` pointing into the proc-macro crate itself. The recursive nature of 'quote!' can be difficult to understand at first. The file `src/test/ui/proc-macro/quote-debug.stdout` shows the output of the `quote!` macro, which should make this eaier to understand. This PR also supports custom quoting spans in custom quote macros (e.g. the `quote` crate). All span quoting goes through the `proc_macro::quote_span` method, which can be called by a custom quote macro to perform span quoting. An example of this usage is provided in `src/test/ui/proc-macro/auxiliary/custom-quote.rs` Custom quoting currently has a few limitations: In order to quote a span, we need to generate a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`. However, proc-macros support renaming the `proc_macro` crate, so we can't simply hardcode this path. Previously, the `quote_span` method used the path `crate::Span` - however, this only works when it is called by the builtin `quote!` macro in the same crate. To support being called from arbitrary crates, we need access to the name of the `proc_macro` crate to generate a path. This PR adds an additional argument to `quote_span` to specify the name of the `proc_macro` crate. Howver, this feels kind of hacky, and we may want to change this before stabilizing anything quote-related. Additionally, using `quote_span` currently requires enabling the `proc_macro_internals` feature. The builtin `quote!` macro has an `#[allow_internal_unstable]` attribute, but this won't work for custom quote implementations. This will likely require some additional tricks to apply `allow_internal_unstable` to the span of `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`.
2020-08-02 23:52:16 +00:00
let server = proc_macro_server::Rustc::new(ecx, self.krate);
self.client
.run(&EXEC_STRATEGY, server, annotation, annotated, ecx.ecfg.proc_macro_backtrace)
.map_err(|e| {
let mut err = ecx.struct_span_err(span, "custom attribute panicked");
if let Some(s) = e.as_str() {
err.help(&format!("message: {}", s));
}
err.emit();
ErrorReported
})
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
}
}
pub struct ProcMacroDerive {
pub client: pm::bridge::client::Client<fn(pm::TokenStream) -> pm::TokenStream>,
Implement span quoting for proc-macros This PR implements span quoting, allowing proc-macros to produce spans pointing *into their own crate*. This is used by the unstable `proc_macro::quote!` macro, allowing us to get error messages like this: ``` error[E0412]: cannot find type `MissingType` in this scope --> $DIR/auxiliary/span-from-proc-macro.rs:37:20 | LL | pub fn error_from_attribute(_args: TokenStream, _input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream { | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this expansion of procedural macro `#[error_from_attribute]` ... LL | field: MissingType | ^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in this scope | ::: $DIR/span-from-proc-macro.rs:8:1 | LL | #[error_from_attribute] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation ``` Here, `MissingType` occurs inside the implementation of the proc-macro `#[error_from_attribute]`. Previosuly, this would always result in a span pointing at `#[error_from_attribute]` This will make many proc-macro-related error message much more useful - when a proc-macro generates code containing an error, users will get an error message pointing directly at that code (within the macro definition), instead of always getting a span pointing at the macro invocation site. This is implemented as follows: * When a proc-macro crate is being *compiled*, it causes the `quote!` macro to get run. This saves all of the sapns in the input to `quote!` into the metadata of *the proc-macro-crate* (which we are currently compiling). The `quote!` macro then expands to a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span(id)`, where `id` is an opaque identifier for the span in the crate metadata. * When the same proc-macro crate is *run* (e.g. it is loaded from disk and invoked by some consumer crate), the call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span` causes us to load the span from the proc-macro crate's metadata. The proc-macro then produces a `TokenStream` containing a `Span` pointing into the proc-macro crate itself. The recursive nature of 'quote!' can be difficult to understand at first. The file `src/test/ui/proc-macro/quote-debug.stdout` shows the output of the `quote!` macro, which should make this eaier to understand. This PR also supports custom quoting spans in custom quote macros (e.g. the `quote` crate). All span quoting goes through the `proc_macro::quote_span` method, which can be called by a custom quote macro to perform span quoting. An example of this usage is provided in `src/test/ui/proc-macro/auxiliary/custom-quote.rs` Custom quoting currently has a few limitations: In order to quote a span, we need to generate a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`. However, proc-macros support renaming the `proc_macro` crate, so we can't simply hardcode this path. Previously, the `quote_span` method used the path `crate::Span` - however, this only works when it is called by the builtin `quote!` macro in the same crate. To support being called from arbitrary crates, we need access to the name of the `proc_macro` crate to generate a path. This PR adds an additional argument to `quote_span` to specify the name of the `proc_macro` crate. Howver, this feels kind of hacky, and we may want to change this before stabilizing anything quote-related. Additionally, using `quote_span` currently requires enabling the `proc_macro_internals` feature. The builtin `quote!` macro has an `#[allow_internal_unstable]` attribute, but this won't work for custom quote implementations. This will likely require some additional tricks to apply `allow_internal_unstable` to the span of `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`.
2020-08-02 23:52:16 +00:00
pub krate: CrateNum,
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
}
impl MultiItemModifier for ProcMacroDerive {
2019-12-22 22:42:04 +00:00
fn expand(
&self,
ecx: &mut ExtCtxt<'_>,
span: Span,
_meta_item: &ast::MetaItem,
item: Annotatable,
) -> ExpandResult<Vec<Annotatable>, Annotatable> {
// We need special handling for statement items
// (e.g. `fn foo() { #[derive(Debug)] struct Bar; }`)
let mut is_stmt = false;
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
let item = match item {
Annotatable::Item(item) => token::NtItem(item),
Annotatable::Stmt(stmt) => {
is_stmt = true;
assert!(stmt.is_item());
// A proc macro can't observe the fact that we're passing
// them an `NtStmt` - it can only see the underlying tokens
// of the wrapped item
token::NtStmt(stmt.into_inner())
}
_ => unreachable!(),
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
};
Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `procedural-masquerade` We now lint on *any* use of `procedural-masquerade` crate. While this crate still exists, its main reverse dependency (`cssparser`) no longer depends on it. Any crates still depending off should stop doing so, as it only exists to support very old Rust versions. If a crate actually needs to support old versions of rustc via `procedural-masquerade`, then they'll just need to accept the warning until we remove it entirely (at the same time as the back-compat hack). The latest version of `procedural-masquerade` does not work with the latest rustc, but trying to check for the version seems like more trouble than it's worth. While working on this, I realized that the `proc-macro-hack` check was never actually doing anything. The corresponding enum variant in `proc-macro-hack` is named `Value` or `Nested` - it has never been called `Input`. Due to a strange Crater issue, the Crater run that tested adding this did *not* end up testing it - some of the crates that would have failed did not actually have their tests checked, making it seem as though the `proc-macro-hack` check was working. The Crater issue is being discussed at https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/Nearly.20identical.20Crater.20runs.20processed.20a.20crate.20differently/near/230406661 Despite the `proc-macro-hack` check not actually doing anything, we haven't gotten any reports from users about their build being broken. I went ahead and removed it entirely, since it's clear that no one is being affected by the `proc-macro-hack` regression in practice.
2021-03-15 19:54:25 +00:00
let input = if crate::base::pretty_printing_compatibility_hack(&item, &ecx.sess.parse_sess)
{
2020-07-01 10:16:49 +00:00
TokenTree::token(token::Interpolated(Lrc::new(item)), DUMMY_SP).into()
} else {
Implement token-based handling of attributes during expansion This PR modifies the macro expansion infrastructure to handle attributes in a fully token-based manner. As a result: * Derives macros no longer lose spans when their input is modified by eager cfg-expansion. This is accomplished by performing eager cfg-expansion on the token stream that we pass to the derive proc-macro * Inner attributes now preserve spans in all cases, including when we have multiple inner attributes in a row. This is accomplished through the following changes: * New structs `AttrAnnotatedTokenStream` and `AttrAnnotatedTokenTree` are introduced. These are very similar to a normal `TokenTree`, but they also track the position of attributes and attribute targets within the stream. They are built when we collect tokens during parsing. An `AttrAnnotatedTokenStream` is converted to a regular `TokenStream` when we invoke a macro. * Token capturing and `LazyTokenStream` are modified to work with `AttrAnnotatedTokenStream`. A new `ReplaceRange` type is introduced, which is created during the parsing of a nested AST node to make the 'outer' AST node aware of the attributes and attribute target stored deeper in the token stream. * When we need to perform eager cfg-expansion (either due to `#[derive]` or `#[cfg_eval]`), we tokenize and reparse our target, capturing additional information about the locations of `#[cfg]` and `#[cfg_attr]` attributes at any depth within the target. This is a performance optimization, allowing us to perform less work in the typical case where captured tokens never have eager cfg-expansion run.
2020-11-28 23:33:17 +00:00
nt_to_tokenstream(&item, &ecx.sess.parse_sess, CanSynthesizeMissingTokens::No)
};
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
Implement span quoting for proc-macros This PR implements span quoting, allowing proc-macros to produce spans pointing *into their own crate*. This is used by the unstable `proc_macro::quote!` macro, allowing us to get error messages like this: ``` error[E0412]: cannot find type `MissingType` in this scope --> $DIR/auxiliary/span-from-proc-macro.rs:37:20 | LL | pub fn error_from_attribute(_args: TokenStream, _input: TokenStream) -> TokenStream { | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in this expansion of procedural macro `#[error_from_attribute]` ... LL | field: MissingType | ^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in this scope | ::: $DIR/span-from-proc-macro.rs:8:1 | LL | #[error_from_attribute] | ----------------------- in this macro invocation ``` Here, `MissingType` occurs inside the implementation of the proc-macro `#[error_from_attribute]`. Previosuly, this would always result in a span pointing at `#[error_from_attribute]` This will make many proc-macro-related error message much more useful - when a proc-macro generates code containing an error, users will get an error message pointing directly at that code (within the macro definition), instead of always getting a span pointing at the macro invocation site. This is implemented as follows: * When a proc-macro crate is being *compiled*, it causes the `quote!` macro to get run. This saves all of the sapns in the input to `quote!` into the metadata of *the proc-macro-crate* (which we are currently compiling). The `quote!` macro then expands to a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span(id)`, where `id` is an opaque identifier for the span in the crate metadata. * When the same proc-macro crate is *run* (e.g. it is loaded from disk and invoked by some consumer crate), the call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span` causes us to load the span from the proc-macro crate's metadata. The proc-macro then produces a `TokenStream` containing a `Span` pointing into the proc-macro crate itself. The recursive nature of 'quote!' can be difficult to understand at first. The file `src/test/ui/proc-macro/quote-debug.stdout` shows the output of the `quote!` macro, which should make this eaier to understand. This PR also supports custom quoting spans in custom quote macros (e.g. the `quote` crate). All span quoting goes through the `proc_macro::quote_span` method, which can be called by a custom quote macro to perform span quoting. An example of this usage is provided in `src/test/ui/proc-macro/auxiliary/custom-quote.rs` Custom quoting currently has a few limitations: In order to quote a span, we need to generate a call to `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`. However, proc-macros support renaming the `proc_macro` crate, so we can't simply hardcode this path. Previously, the `quote_span` method used the path `crate::Span` - however, this only works when it is called by the builtin `quote!` macro in the same crate. To support being called from arbitrary crates, we need access to the name of the `proc_macro` crate to generate a path. This PR adds an additional argument to `quote_span` to specify the name of the `proc_macro` crate. Howver, this feels kind of hacky, and we may want to change this before stabilizing anything quote-related. Additionally, using `quote_span` currently requires enabling the `proc_macro_internals` feature. The builtin `quote!` macro has an `#[allow_internal_unstable]` attribute, but this won't work for custom quote implementations. This will likely require some additional tricks to apply `allow_internal_unstable` to the span of `proc_macro::Span::recover_proc_macro_span`.
2020-08-02 23:52:16 +00:00
let server = proc_macro_server::Rustc::new(ecx, self.krate);
let stream =
match self.client.run(&EXEC_STRATEGY, server, input, ecx.ecfg.proc_macro_backtrace) {
Ok(stream) => stream,
Err(e) => {
let mut err = ecx.struct_span_err(span, "proc-macro derive panicked");
if let Some(s) = e.as_str() {
err.help(&format!("message: {}", s));
}
err.emit();
return ExpandResult::Ready(vec![]);
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
}
};
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
let error_count_before = ecx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic.err_count();
2019-12-22 22:42:04 +00:00
let mut parser =
rustc_parse::stream_to_parser(&ecx.sess.parse_sess, stream, Some("proc-macro derive"));
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
let mut items = vec![];
loop {
match parser.parse_item(ForceCollect::No) {
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
Ok(None) => break,
Ok(Some(item)) => {
if is_stmt {
items.push(Annotatable::Stmt(P(ecx.stmt_item(span, item))));
} else {
items.push(Annotatable::Item(item));
}
}
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
Err(mut err) => {
err.emit();
break;
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
}
}
}
// fail if there have been errors emitted
if ecx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic.err_count() > error_count_before {
ecx.struct_span_err(span, "proc-macro derive produced unparseable tokens").emit();
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
}
ExpandResult::Ready(items)
2019-07-18 18:02:34 +00:00
}
}