2023-05-23 13:20:57 +00:00
|
|
|
//@ needs-unwind - this test verifies the amount of drop calls when unwinding is used
|
2016-02-03 18:27:32 +00:00
|
|
|
//@ compile-flags: -C no-prepopulate-passes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#![crate_type = "lib"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct SomeUniqueName;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl Drop for SomeUniqueName {
|
2023-10-07 00:29:42 +00:00
|
|
|
#[inline(never)]
|
2024-05-29 04:11:20 +00:00
|
|
|
fn drop(&mut self) {}
|
2016-02-03 18:27:32 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-07 00:29:42 +00:00
|
|
|
#[inline(never)]
|
2024-05-29 04:11:20 +00:00
|
|
|
pub fn possibly_unwinding() {}
|
2016-02-03 18:27:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: @droppy
|
|
|
|
#[no_mangle]
|
|
|
|
pub fn droppy() {
|
2024-05-29 04:11:20 +00:00
|
|
|
// Check that there are exactly 6 drop calls. The cleanups for the unwinding should be reused,
|
|
|
|
// so that's one new drop call per call to possibly_unwinding(), and finally 3 drop calls for
|
|
|
|
// the regular function exit. We used to have problems with quadratic growths of drop calls in
|
|
|
|
// such functions.
|
|
|
|
// FIXME(eddyb) the `void @` forces a match on the instruction, instead of the
|
|
|
|
// comment, that's `; call core::ptr::drop_in_place::<drop::SomeUniqueName>`
|
|
|
|
// for the `v0` mangling, should switch to matching on that once `legacy` is gone.
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-COUNT-6: {{(call|invoke) void @.*}}drop_in_place{{.*}}SomeUniqueName
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: {{(call|invoke) void @.*}}drop_in_place{{.*}}SomeUniqueName
|
|
|
|
// The next line checks for the } that ends the function definition
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: {{^[}]}}
|
2016-02-03 18:27:32 +00:00
|
|
|
let _s = SomeUniqueName;
|
|
|
|
possibly_unwinding();
|
|
|
|
let _s = SomeUniqueName;
|
|
|
|
possibly_unwinding();
|
|
|
|
let _s = SomeUniqueName;
|
|
|
|
possibly_unwinding();
|
|
|
|
}
|