rust/tests/rustdoc-ui/unknown-renamed-lints.rs

#![deny(unknown_lints)]
//~^ NOTE lint level is defined
#![deny(renamed_and_removed_lints)]
//~^ NOTE lint level is defined
#![deny(x)]
//~^ ERROR unknown lint
#![deny(rustdoc::x)]
//~^ ERROR unknown lint: `rustdoc::x`
#![deny(intra_doc_link_resolution_failure)]
//~^ ERROR renamed to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links`
#![deny(non_autolinks)]
//~^ ERROR renamed to `rustdoc::bare_urls`
#![deny(rustdoc::non_autolinks)]
//~^ ERROR renamed to `rustdoc::bare_urls`

#![deny(private_doc_tests)]
//~^ ERROR renamed to `rustdoc::private_doc_tests`

#![deny(rustdoc)]
//~^ ERROR removed: use `rustdoc::all` instead

// Explicitly don't try to handle this case, it was never valid
#![deny(rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure)]
//~^ ERROR unknown lint
Warn about unknown or renamed lints Originally I tried to do a much broader refactoring that got rid of `init_lints` altogether. My reasoning is that now the lints aren't being run anymore (after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73566), there's no need to ignore them explicitly. But it seems there are still some lints that aren't affected by setting `lint_mod` to a no-op: ``` deny(pub_use_of_private_extern_crate) deny(const_err) warn(unused_imports) ``` (there are possibly more, these are just the ones that failed in the rustdoc test suite). Some of these seem like we really should be warning about, but that's a much larger change and I don't propose to make it here. So for the time being, this just adds the `unknown_lints` and `renamed_or_removed_lints` passes to the list of lints rustdoc warns about. 2020-08-25 14:02:16 +00:00			`#![deny(unknown_lints)]`
			`//~^ NOTE lint level is defined`
			`#![deny(renamed_and_removed_lints)]`
			`//~^ NOTE lint level is defined`
			`#![deny(x)]`
			`//~^ ERROR unknown lint`
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does not suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid. 2020-12-30 04:16:16 +00:00			`#![deny(rustdoc::x)]`
			//~^ ERROR unknown lint: `rustdoc::x`
Warn about unknown or renamed lints Originally I tried to do a much broader refactoring that got rid of `init_lints` altogether. My reasoning is that now the lints aren't being run anymore (after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73566), there's no need to ignore them explicitly. But it seems there are still some lints that aren't affected by setting `lint_mod` to a no-op: ``` deny(pub_use_of_private_extern_crate) deny(const_err) warn(unused_imports) ``` (there are possibly more, these are just the ones that failed in the rustdoc test suite). Some of these seem like we really should be warning about, but that's a much larger change and I don't propose to make it here. So for the time being, this just adds the `unknown_lints` and `renamed_or_removed_lints` passes to the list of lints rustdoc warns about. 2020-08-25 14:02:16 +00:00			`#![deny(intra_doc_link_resolution_failure)]`
Improve error messages - Use `register_renamed` when rustdoc is running so the lint will still be active and use a structured suggestion - Test the behavior for rustc, not just for rustdoc (because it differs) 2021-01-17 23:52:19 +00:00			//~^ ERROR renamed to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links`
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does not suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid. 2020-12-30 04:16:16 +00:00			`#![deny(non_autolinks)]`
Rename non_autolinks -> bare_urls 2021-03-28 03:35:02 +00:00			//~^ ERROR renamed to `rustdoc::bare_urls`
			`#![deny(rustdoc::non_autolinks)]`
			//~^ ERROR renamed to `rustdoc::bare_urls`

			`#![deny(private_doc_tests)]`
Warn when `rustdoc::` group is omitted from lint names 2021-07-03 19:20:29 +00:00			//~^ ERROR renamed to `rustdoc::private_doc_tests`
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does not suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid. 2020-12-30 04:16:16 +00:00
Rename `rustdoc` to `rustdoc::all` When rustdoc lints were changed to be tool lints, the `rustdoc` group was removed, leading to spurious warnings like ``` warning: unknown lint: `rustdoc` ``` The lint group still worked when rustdoc ran, since rustdoc added the group itself. This renames the group to `rustdoc::all` for consistency with `clippy::all` and the rest of the rustdoc lints. 2021-03-05 14:50:20 +00:00			`#![deny(rustdoc)]`
			//~^ ERROR removed: use `rustdoc::all` instead

Improve error messages - Use `register_renamed` when rustdoc is running so the lint will still be active and use a structured suggestion - Test the behavior for rustc, not just for rustdoc (because it differs) 2021-01-17 23:52:19 +00:00			`// Explicitly don't try to handle this case, it was never valid`
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does not suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid. 2020-12-30 04:16:16 +00:00			`#![deny(rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure)]`
			`//~^ ERROR unknown lint`