nordic-dev.net/rust
nordic-dev.net/rust
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git synced 2024-11-28 17:53:56 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
16768e59ea
rust/tests/coverage/issue-93054.cov-map

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

25 lines
734 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 11:29:41 +00:00
Function name: issue_93054::foo2 (unused)
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 09:58:11 +00:00
Raw bytes (9): 0x[01, 01, 00, 01, 00, 16, 01, 00, 1d]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 11:29:41 +00:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 0
Number of file 0 mappings: 1
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 09:58:11 +00:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 22, 1) to (start + 0, 29)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 11:29:41 +00:00
Function name: issue_93054::main
Raw bytes (9): 0x[01, 01, 00, 01, 01, 1e, 01, 00, 0d]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 0
Number of file 0 mappings: 1
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 30, 1) to (start + 0, 13)
Function name: issue_93054::make (unused)
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 09:58:11 +00:00
Raw bytes (9): 0x[01, 01, 00, 01, 00, 1a, 01, 02, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 11:29:41 +00:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 0
Number of file 0 mappings: 1
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 09:58:11 +00:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 26, 1) to (start + 2, 2)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 11:29:41 +00:00
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink