rust/tests/codegen/function-arguments.rs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

272 lines
8.3 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

//@ compile-flags: -O -C no-prepopulate-passes
#![crate_type = "lib"]
2023-02-10 23:54:05 +00:00
#![feature(dyn_star)]
#![feature(allocator_api)]
use std::marker::PhantomPinned;
use std::mem::MaybeUninit;
2024-02-22 13:59:52 +00:00
use std::num::NonZero;
2022-12-30 20:11:30 +00:00
use std::ptr::NonNull;
pub struct S {
_field: [i32; 8],
}
pub struct UnsafeInner {
_field: std::cell::UnsafeCell<i16>,
}
pub struct NotUnpin {
_field: i32,
_marker: PhantomPinned,
}
pub enum MyBool {
True,
False,
}
// CHECK: noundef zeroext i1 @boolean(i1 noundef zeroext %x)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn boolean(x: bool) -> bool {
x
}
// CHECK: i8 @maybeuninit_boolean(i8 %x)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn maybeuninit_boolean(x: MaybeUninit<bool>) -> MaybeUninit<bool> {
x
}
// CHECK: noundef zeroext i1 @enum_bool(i1 noundef zeroext %x)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn enum_bool(x: MyBool) -> MyBool {
x
}
// CHECK: i8 @maybeuninit_enum_bool(i8 %x)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn maybeuninit_enum_bool(x: MaybeUninit<MyBool>) -> MaybeUninit<MyBool> {
x
}
// CHECK: noundef{{( range\(i32 0, 1114112\))?}} i32 @char(i32 noundef{{( range\(i32 0, 1114112\))?}} %x)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn char(x: char) -> char {
x
}
// CHECK: i32 @maybeuninit_char(i32 %x)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn maybeuninit_char(x: MaybeUninit<char>) -> MaybeUninit<char> {
x
}
// CHECK: noundef i64 @int(i64 noundef %x)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn int(x: u64) -> u64 {
x
}
// CHECK: noundef{{( range\(i64 1, 0\))?}} i64 @nonzero_int(i64 noundef{{( range\(i64 1, 0\))?}} %x)
#[no_mangle]
2024-02-22 13:59:52 +00:00
pub fn nonzero_int(x: NonZero<u64>) -> NonZero<u64> {
x
}
// CHECK: noundef i64 @option_nonzero_int(i64 noundef %x)
#[no_mangle]
2024-02-22 13:59:52 +00:00
pub fn option_nonzero_int(x: Option<NonZero<u64>>) -> Option<NonZero<u64>> {
x
}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @readonly_borrow(ptr noalias noundef readonly align 4 dereferenceable(4) %_1)
// FIXME #25759 This should also have `nocapture`
#[no_mangle]
pub fn readonly_borrow(_: &i32) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: noundef align 4 dereferenceable(4) ptr @readonly_borrow_ret()
#[no_mangle]
pub fn readonly_borrow_ret() -> &'static i32 {
loop {}
}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @static_borrow(ptr noalias noundef readonly align 4 dereferenceable(4) %_1)
// static borrow may be captured
#[no_mangle]
pub fn static_borrow(_: &'static i32) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @named_borrow(ptr noalias noundef readonly align 4 dereferenceable(4) %_1)
// borrow with named lifetime may be captured
#[no_mangle]
pub fn named_borrow<'r>(_: &'r i32) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @unsafe_borrow(ptr noundef nonnull align 2 %_1)
// unsafe interior means this isn't actually readonly and there may be aliases ...
#[no_mangle]
pub fn unsafe_borrow(_: &UnsafeInner) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @mutable_unsafe_borrow(ptr noalias noundef align 2 dereferenceable(2) %_1)
// ... unless this is a mutable borrow, those never alias
#[no_mangle]
pub fn mutable_unsafe_borrow(_: &mut UnsafeInner) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @mutable_borrow(ptr noalias noundef align 4 dereferenceable(4) %_1)
// FIXME #25759 This should also have `nocapture`
#[no_mangle]
pub fn mutable_borrow(_: &mut i32) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: noundef align 4 dereferenceable(4) ptr @mutable_borrow_ret()
#[no_mangle]
pub fn mutable_borrow_ret() -> &'static mut i32 {
loop {}
}
#[no_mangle]
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @mutable_notunpin_borrow(ptr noundef nonnull align 4 %_1)
// This one is *not* `noalias` because it might be self-referential.
// It is also not `dereferenceable` due to
// <https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/381>.
pub fn mutable_notunpin_borrow(_: &mut NotUnpin) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @notunpin_borrow(ptr noalias noundef readonly align 4 dereferenceable(4) %_1)
// But `&NotUnpin` behaves perfectly normal.
#[no_mangle]
pub fn notunpin_borrow(_: &NotUnpin) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @indirect_struct(ptr noalias nocapture noundef readonly align 4 dereferenceable(32) %_1)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn indirect_struct(_: S) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @borrowed_struct(ptr noalias noundef readonly align 4 dereferenceable(32) %_1)
// FIXME #25759 This should also have `nocapture`
#[no_mangle]
pub fn borrowed_struct(_: &S) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @option_borrow(ptr noalias noundef readonly align 4 dereferenceable_or_null(4) %x)
2022-12-30 20:11:30 +00:00
#[no_mangle]
pub fn option_borrow(x: Option<&i32>) {}
2022-12-30 20:11:30 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @option_borrow_mut(ptr noalias noundef align 4 dereferenceable_or_null(4) %x)
2022-12-30 20:11:30 +00:00
#[no_mangle]
pub fn option_borrow_mut(x: Option<&mut i32>) {}
2022-12-30 20:11:30 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @raw_struct(ptr noundef %_1)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn raw_struct(_: *const S) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @raw_option_nonnull_struct(ptr noundef %_1)
2022-12-30 20:11:30 +00:00
#[no_mangle]
pub fn raw_option_nonnull_struct(_: Option<NonNull<S>>) {}
2022-12-30 20:11:30 +00:00
// `Box` can get deallocated during execution of the function, so it should
// not get `dereferenceable`.
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: noundef nonnull align 4 ptr @_box(ptr noalias noundef nonnull align 4 %x)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn _box(x: Box<i32>) -> Box<i32> {
x
}
// With a custom allocator, it should *not* have `noalias`. (See
// <https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3341> for why.) The second argument is the allocator,
// which is a reference here that still carries `noalias` as usual.
// CHECK: @_box_custom(ptr noundef nonnull align 4 %x.0, ptr noalias noundef nonnull readonly align 1 %x.1)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn _box_custom(x: Box<i32, &std::alloc::Global>) {
drop(x)
}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: noundef nonnull align 4 ptr @notunpin_box(ptr noundef nonnull align 4 %x)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn notunpin_box(x: Box<NotUnpin>) -> Box<NotUnpin> {
x
}
// CHECK: @struct_return(ptr{{( dead_on_unwind)?}} noalias nocapture noundef{{( writable)?}} sret([32 x i8]) align 4 dereferenceable(32){{( %_0)?}})
#[no_mangle]
pub fn struct_return() -> S {
S { _field: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] }
}
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
// Hack to get the correct size for the length part in slices
// CHECK: @helper([[USIZE:i[0-9]+]] noundef %_1)
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
#[no_mangle]
pub fn helper(_: usize) {}
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @slice(ptr noalias noundef nonnull readonly align 1 %_1.0, [[USIZE]] noundef %_1.1)
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
// FIXME #25759 This should also have `nocapture`
#[no_mangle]
pub fn slice(_: &[u8]) {}
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @mutable_slice(ptr noalias noundef nonnull align 1 %_1.0, [[USIZE]] noundef %_1.1)
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
// FIXME #25759 This should also have `nocapture`
#[no_mangle]
pub fn mutable_slice(_: &mut [u8]) {}
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @unsafe_slice(ptr noundef nonnull align 2 %_1.0, [[USIZE]] noundef %_1.1)
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
// unsafe interior means this isn't actually readonly and there may be aliases ...
#[no_mangle]
pub fn unsafe_slice(_: &[UnsafeInner]) {}
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @raw_slice(ptr noundef %_1.0, [[USIZE]] noundef %_1.1)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn raw_slice(_: *const [u8]) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @str(ptr noalias noundef nonnull readonly align 1 %_1.0, [[USIZE]] noundef %_1.1)
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
// FIXME #25759 This should also have `nocapture`
#[no_mangle]
pub fn str(_: &[u8]) {}
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @trait_borrow(ptr noundef nonnull align 1 %_1.0, {{.+}} noalias noundef readonly align {{.*}} dereferenceable({{.*}}) %_1.1)
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
// FIXME #25759 This should also have `nocapture`
#[no_mangle]
pub fn trait_borrow(_: &dyn Drop) {}
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @option_trait_borrow(ptr noundef align 1 %x.0, ptr %x.1)
2022-12-30 20:11:30 +00:00
#[no_mangle]
pub fn option_trait_borrow(x: Option<&dyn Drop>) {}
2022-12-30 20:11:30 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @option_trait_borrow_mut(ptr noundef align 1 %x.0, ptr %x.1)
2022-12-30 20:11:30 +00:00
#[no_mangle]
pub fn option_trait_borrow_mut(x: Option<&mut dyn Drop>) {}
2022-12-30 20:11:30 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @trait_raw(ptr noundef %_1.0, {{.+}} noalias noundef readonly align {{.*}} dereferenceable({{.*}}) %_1.1)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn trait_raw(_: *const dyn Drop) {}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: @trait_box(ptr noalias noundef nonnull align 1{{( %0)?}}, {{.+}} noalias noundef readonly align {{.*}} dereferenceable({{.*}}){{( %1)?}})
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
#[no_mangle]
pub fn trait_box(_: Box<dyn Drop + Unpin>) {}
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: { ptr, ptr } @trait_option(ptr noalias noundef align 1 %x.0, ptr %x.1)
#[no_mangle]
pub fn trait_option(x: Option<Box<dyn Drop + Unpin>>) -> Option<Box<dyn Drop + Unpin>> {
x
}
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: { ptr, [[USIZE]] } @return_slice(ptr noalias noundef nonnull readonly align 2 %x.0, [[USIZE]] noundef %x.1)
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
#[no_mangle]
2017-10-30 17:18:00 +00:00
pub fn return_slice(x: &[u16]) -> &[u16] {
x
Pass fat pointers in two immediate arguments This has a number of advantages compared to creating a copy in memory and passing a pointer. The obvious one is that we don't have to put the data into memory but can keep it in registers. Since we're currently passing a pointer anyway (instead of using e.g. a known offset on the stack, which is what the `byval` attribute would achieve), we only use a single additional register for each fat pointer, but save at least two pointers worth of stack in exchange (sometimes more because more than one copy gets eliminated). On archs that pass arguments on the stack, we save a pointer worth of stack even without considering the omitted copies. Additionally, LLVM can optimize the code a lot better, to a large degree due to the fact that lots of copies are gone or can be optimized away. Additionally, we can now emit attributes like nonnull on the data and/or vtable pointers contained in the fat pointer, potentially allowing for even more optimizations. This results in LLVM passes being about 3-7% faster (depending on the crate), and the resulting code is also a few percent smaller, for example: text data filename 5671479 3941461 before/librustc-d8ace771.so 5447663 3905745 after/librustc-d8ace771.so 1944425 2394024 before/libstd-d8ace771.so 1896769 2387610 after/libstd-d8ace771.so I had to remove a call in the backtrace-debuginfo test, because LLVM can now merge the tails of some blocks when optimizations are turned on, which can't correctly preserve line info. Fixes #22924 Cc #22891 (at least for fat pointers the code is good now)
2015-06-18 21:57:40 +00:00
}
// CHECK: { i16, i16 } @enum_id_1(i16 noundef{{( range\(i16 0, 3\))?}} %x.0, i16 %x.1)
2018-03-27 14:44:03 +00:00
#[no_mangle]
pub fn enum_id_1(x: Option<Result<u16, u16>>) -> Option<Result<u16, u16>> {
x
2018-03-27 14:44:03 +00:00
}
// CHECK: { i1, i8 } @enum_id_2(i1 noundef zeroext %x.0, i8 %x.1)
2018-03-27 14:44:03 +00:00
#[no_mangle]
pub fn enum_id_2(x: Option<u8>) -> Option<u8> {
x
2018-03-27 14:44:03 +00:00
}
2023-02-10 23:54:05 +00:00
2023-07-27 21:44:13 +00:00
// CHECK: { ptr, {{.+}} } @dyn_star(ptr noundef %x.0, {{.+}} noalias noundef readonly align {{.*}} dereferenceable({{.*}}) %x.1)
// Expect an ABI something like `{ {}*, [3 x i64]* }`, but that's hard to match on generically,
// so do like the `trait_box` test and just match on `{{.+}}` for the vtable.
2023-02-10 23:54:05 +00:00
#[no_mangle]
pub fn dyn_star(x: dyn* Drop) -> dyn* Drop {
x
2023-02-10 23:54:05 +00:00
}