nordic-dev.net/rust
nordic-dev.net/rust
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git synced 2024-11-27 17:24:06 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
0f7f3f4045
rust/tests/ui/issues/issue-52717.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

13 lines
418 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Fixed: Multiple errors on single typo in match pattern Here we have fixed the case where we were throwing two diagnostic messages `E0026` and `E0027` for same case like this Example error[E0026]: variant `A::A` does not have a field named `fob` --> src/test/ui/issue-52717.rs:20:12 | 20 | A::A { fob } => { println!("{}", fob); } | ^^^ variant `A::A` does not have this field error[E0027]: pattern does not mention field `foo` --> src/test/ui/issue-52717.rs:20:5 | 20 | A::A { fob } => { println!("{}", fob); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing field `foo` error: aborting due to 2 previous errors Here above we can see that both `E0026` and `E0027` are depicting same thing. So, to fix this issue, we are simply checking element of `inexistent_fields` is there any value lies in `unmentioned_fields` using Levenshtein algorithm, if does then for that case we are simply deleting element from `unmentioned_fields`. More or less now instead of showing separate message in `E0027` we are giving extra hint on `E0026` Address: #52717
2018-10-19 10:33:49 +00:00
error[E0026]: variant `A::A` does not have a field named `fob`
Remove licenses
2018-12-25 15:56:47 +00:00
--> $DIR/issue-52717.rs:10:12
Fixed: Multiple errors on single typo in match pattern Here we have fixed the case where we were throwing two diagnostic messages `E0026` and `E0027` for same case like this Example error[E0026]: variant `A::A` does not have a field named `fob` --> src/test/ui/issue-52717.rs:20:12 | 20 | A::A { fob } => { println!("{}", fob); } | ^^^ variant `A::A` does not have this field error[E0027]: pattern does not mention field `foo` --> src/test/ui/issue-52717.rs:20:5 | 20 | A::A { fob } => { println!("{}", fob); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing field `foo` error: aborting due to 2 previous errors Here above we can see that both `E0026` and `E0027` are depicting same thing. So, to fix this issue, we are simply checking element of `inexistent_fields` is there any value lies in `unmentioned_fields` using Levenshtein algorithm, if does then for that case we are simply deleting element from `unmentioned_fields`. More or less now instead of showing separate message in `E0027` we are giving extra hint on `E0026` Address: #52717
2018-10-19 10:33:49 +00:00
|
LL | A::A { fob } => { println!("{}", fob); }
| ^^^
| |
| variant `A::A` does not have this field
use the identifier span for missing struct field
2019-03-16 17:14:01 +00:00
| help: a field with a similar name exists: `foo`
Fixed: Multiple errors on single typo in match pattern Here we have fixed the case where we were throwing two diagnostic messages `E0026` and `E0027` for same case like this Example error[E0026]: variant `A::A` does not have a field named `fob` --> src/test/ui/issue-52717.rs:20:12 | 20 | A::A { fob } => { println!("{}", fob); } | ^^^ variant `A::A` does not have this field error[E0027]: pattern does not mention field `foo` --> src/test/ui/issue-52717.rs:20:5 | 20 | A::A { fob } => { println!("{}", fob); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing field `foo` error: aborting due to 2 previous errors Here above we can see that both `E0026` and `E0027` are depicting same thing. So, to fix this issue, we are simply checking element of `inexistent_fields` is there any value lies in `unmentioned_fields` using Levenshtein algorithm, if does then for that case we are simply deleting element from `unmentioned_fields`. More or less now instead of showing separate message in `E0027` we are giving extra hint on `E0026` Address: #52717
2018-10-19 10:33:49 +00:00
Show number in error message even for one error Co-authored-by: Adrian <adrian.iosdev@gmail.com>
2023-11-21 15:44:16 +00:00
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
Fixed: Multiple errors on single typo in match pattern Here we have fixed the case where we were throwing two diagnostic messages `E0026` and `E0027` for same case like this Example error[E0026]: variant `A::A` does not have a field named `fob` --> src/test/ui/issue-52717.rs:20:12 | 20 | A::A { fob } => { println!("{}", fob); } | ^^^ variant `A::A` does not have this field error[E0027]: pattern does not mention field `foo` --> src/test/ui/issue-52717.rs:20:5 | 20 | A::A { fob } => { println!("{}", fob); } | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing field `foo` error: aborting due to 2 previous errors Here above we can see that both `E0026` and `E0027` are depicting same thing. So, to fix this issue, we are simply checking element of `inexistent_fields` is there any value lies in `unmentioned_fields` using Levenshtein algorithm, if does then for that case we are simply deleting element from `unmentioned_fields`. More or less now instead of showing separate message in `E0027` we are giving extra hint on `E0026` Address: #52717
2018-10-19 10:33:49 +00:00
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0026`.
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink