rust/tests/ui/issues/issue-51102.stderr

error[E0026]: struct `SimpleStruct` does not have a field named `state`
  --> $DIR/issue-51102.rs:13:17
   |
LL |                 state: 0,
   |                 ^^^^^
   |                 |
   |                 struct `SimpleStruct` does not have this field
   |                 help: `SimpleStruct` has a field named `no_state_here`

error[E0025]: field `no_state_here` bound multiple times in the pattern
  --> $DIR/issue-51102.rs:24:17
   |
LL |                 no_state_here: 0,
   |                 ---------------- first use of `no_state_here`
LL |                 no_state_here: 1
   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ multiple uses of `no_state_here` in pattern

error[E0026]: variant `SimpleEnum::NoState` does not have a field named `state`
  --> $DIR/issue-51102.rs:33:17
   |
LL |                 state: 0
   |                 ^^^^^ variant `SimpleEnum::NoState` does not have this field

error: aborting due to 3 previous errors

Some errors have detailed explanations: E0025, E0026.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0025`.
typeck: Do not pass the field check on field error If a struct pattern has a field error return an error. 2018-05-29 01:51:36 +00:00			error[E0026]: struct `SimpleStruct` does not have a field named `state`
Remove licenses 2018-12-25 15:56:47 +00:00			`--> $DIR/issue-51102.rs:13:17`
typeck: Do not pass the field check on field error If a struct pattern has a field error return an error. 2018-05-29 01:51:36 +00:00			`\|`
			`LL \| state: 0,`
Suggest replacing an inexisting field for an unmentioned field This PR adds a suggestion to replace an inexisting field for an unmentioned field. Given the following code: ```rust enum Foo { Bar { alpha: u8, bravo: u8, charlie: u8 }, } fn foo(foo: Foo) { match foo { Foo::Bar { alpha, beta, // `bravo` miswritten as `beta` here. charlie, } => todo!(), } } ``` the compiler now emits the error messages below. ```text error[E0026]: variant `Foo::Bar` does not have a field named `beta` --> src/lib.rs:9:13 \| 9 \| beta, // `bravo` miswritten as `beta` here. \| ^^^^ \| \| \| variant `Foo::Bar` does not have this field \| help: `Foo::Bar` has a field named `bravo`: `bravo` ``` Note that this suggestion is available iff the number of inexisting fields and unmentioned fields are both 1. 2021-08-12 10:10:44 +00:00			`\| ^^^^^`
			`\| \|`
			\| struct `SimpleStruct` does not have this field
			\| help: `SimpleStruct` has a field named `no_state_here`
typeck: Do not pass the field check on field error If a struct pattern has a field error return an error. 2018-05-29 01:51:36 +00:00
			error[E0025]: field `no_state_here` bound multiple times in the pattern
Remove licenses 2018-12-25 15:56:47 +00:00			`--> $DIR/issue-51102.rs:24:17`
typeck: Do not pass the field check on field error If a struct pattern has a field error return an error. 2018-05-29 01:51:36 +00:00			`\|`
			`LL \| no_state_here: 0,`
			\| ---------------- first use of `no_state_here`
			`LL \| no_state_here: 1`
			\| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ multiple uses of `no_state_here` in pattern

			error[E0026]: variant `SimpleEnum::NoState` does not have a field named `state`
Remove licenses 2018-12-25 15:56:47 +00:00			`--> $DIR/issue-51102.rs:33:17`
typeck: Do not pass the field check on field error If a struct pattern has a field error return an error. 2018-05-29 01:51:36 +00:00			`\|`
			`LL \| state: 0`
use the identifier span for missing struct field 2019-03-16 17:14:01 +00:00			\| ^^^^^ variant `SimpleEnum::NoState` does not have this field
typeck: Do not pass the field check on field error If a struct pattern has a field error return an error. 2018-05-29 01:51:36 +00:00
			`error: aborting due to 3 previous errors`

hide `--explain` hint if error has no extended info 2019-04-17 17:26:38 +00:00			`Some errors have detailed explanations: E0025, E0026.`
typeck: Do not pass the field check on field error If a struct pattern has a field error return an error. 2018-05-29 01:51:36 +00:00			For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0025`.