mirror of
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs.git
synced 2024-12-24 14:43:37 +00:00
c81a429fb7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96796 This may have caused the AArch64 build failure of PyTorch in: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/101917
262 lines
11 KiB
Diff
262 lines
11 KiB
Diff
From 6001db79c477b03eacc7e7049560921fb54b7845 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
|
|
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 20:15:36 +0100
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] lra: Avoid cycling on certain subreg reloads [PR96796]
|
|
|
|
This PR is about LRA cycling for a reload of the form:
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Changing pseudo 196 in operand 1 of insn 103 on equiv [r105:DI*0x8+r140:DI]
|
|
Creating newreg=287, assigning class ALL_REGS to slow/invalid mem r287
|
|
Creating newreg=288, assigning class ALL_REGS to slow/invalid mem r288
|
|
103: r203:SI=r288:SI<<0x1+r196:DI#0
|
|
REG_DEAD r196:DI
|
|
Inserting slow/invalid mem reload before:
|
|
316: r287:DI=[r105:DI*0x8+r140:DI]
|
|
317: r288:SI=r287:DI#0
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The problem is with r287. We rightly give it a broad starting class of
|
|
POINTER_AND_FP_REGS (reduced from ALL_REGS by preferred_reload_class).
|
|
However, we never make forward progress towards narrowing it down to
|
|
a specific choice of class (POINTER_REGS or FP_REGS).
|
|
|
|
I think in practice we rely on two things to narrow a reload pseudo's
|
|
class down to a specific choice:
|
|
|
|
(1) a restricted class is specified when the pseudo is created
|
|
|
|
This happens for input address reloads, where the class is taken
|
|
from the target's chosen base register class. It also happens
|
|
for simple REG reloads, where the class is taken from the chosen
|
|
alternative's constraints.
|
|
|
|
(2) uses of the reload pseudo as a direct input operand
|
|
|
|
In this case get_reload_reg tries to reuse the existing register
|
|
and narrow its class, instead of creating a new reload pseudo.
|
|
|
|
However, neither occurs here. As described above, r287 rightly
|
|
starts out with a wide choice of class, ultimately derived from
|
|
ALL_REGS, so we don't get (1). And as the comments in the PR
|
|
explain, r287 is never used as an input reload, only the subreg is,
|
|
so we don't get (2):
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Choosing alt 13 in insn 317: (0) r (1) w {*movsi_aarch64}
|
|
Creating newreg=291, assigning class FP_REGS to r291
|
|
317: r288:SI=r291:SI
|
|
Inserting insn reload before:
|
|
320: r291:SI=r287:DI#0
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
IMO, in this case we should rely on the reload of r316 to narrow
|
|
down the class of r278. Currently we do:
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Choosing alt 7 in insn 316: (0) r (1) m {*movdi_aarch64}
|
|
Creating newreg=289 from oldreg=287, assigning class GENERAL_REGS to r289
|
|
316: r289:DI=[r105:DI*0x8+r140:DI]
|
|
Inserting insn reload after:
|
|
318: r287:DI=r289:DI
|
|
---------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
i.e. we create a new pseudo register r289 and give *that* pseudo
|
|
GENERAL_REGS instead. This is because get_reload_reg only narrows
|
|
down the existing class for OP_IN and OP_INOUT, not OP_OUT.
|
|
|
|
But if we have a reload pseudo in a reload instruction and have chosen
|
|
a specific class for the reload pseudo, I think we should simply install
|
|
it for OP_OUT reloads too, if the class is a subset of the existing class.
|
|
We will need to pick such a register whatever happens (for r289 in the
|
|
example above). And as explained in the PR, doing this actually avoids
|
|
an unnecessary move via the FP registers too.
|
|
|
|
The patch is quite aggressive in that it does this for all reload
|
|
pseudos in all reload instructions. I wondered about reusing the
|
|
condition for a reload move in in_class_p:
|
|
|
|
INSN_UID (curr_insn) >= new_insn_uid_start
|
|
&& curr_insn_set != NULL
|
|
&& ((OBJECT_P (SET_SRC (curr_insn_set))
|
|
&& ! CONSTANT_P (SET_SRC (curr_insn_set)))
|
|
|| (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (curr_insn_set)) == SUBREG
|
|
&& OBJECT_P (SUBREG_REG (SET_SRC (curr_insn_set)))
|
|
&& ! CONSTANT_P (SUBREG_REG (SET_SRC (curr_insn_set)))))))
|
|
|
|
but I can't really justify that on first principles. I think we
|
|
should apply the rule consistently until we have a specific reason
|
|
for doing otherwise.
|
|
|
|
gcc/
|
|
PR rtl-optimization/96796
|
|
* lra-constraints.c (in_class_p): Add a default-false
|
|
allow_all_reload_class_changes_p parameter. Do not treat
|
|
reload moves specially when the parameter is true.
|
|
(get_reload_reg): Try to narrow the class of an existing OP_OUT
|
|
reload if we're reloading a reload pseudo in a reload instruction.
|
|
|
|
gcc/testsuite/
|
|
PR rtl-optimization/96796
|
|
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr96796.c: New test.
|
|
---
|
|
gcc/lra-constraints.c | 54 ++++++++++++++----
|
|
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr96796.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
|
|
2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
|
|
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr96796.c
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.c b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
|
|
index 580da9c3ed6..161b721efb1 100644
|
|
--- a/gcc/lra-constraints.c
|
|
+++ b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
|
|
@@ -236,12 +236,17 @@ get_reg_class (int regno)
|
|
CL. Use elimination first if REG is a hard register. If REG is a
|
|
reload pseudo created by this constraints pass, assume that it will
|
|
be allocated a hard register from its allocno class, but allow that
|
|
- class to be narrowed to CL if it is currently a superset of CL.
|
|
+ class to be narrowed to CL if it is currently a superset of CL and
|
|
+ if either:
|
|
+
|
|
+ - ALLOW_ALL_RELOAD_CLASS_CHANGES_P is true or
|
|
+ - the instruction we're processing is not a reload move.
|
|
|
|
If NEW_CLASS is nonnull, set *NEW_CLASS to the new allocno class of
|
|
REGNO (reg), or NO_REGS if no change in its class was needed. */
|
|
static bool
|
|
-in_class_p (rtx reg, enum reg_class cl, enum reg_class *new_class)
|
|
+in_class_p (rtx reg, enum reg_class cl, enum reg_class *new_class,
|
|
+ bool allow_all_reload_class_changes_p = false)
|
|
{
|
|
enum reg_class rclass, common_class;
|
|
machine_mode reg_mode;
|
|
@@ -266,7 +271,8 @@ in_class_p (rtx reg, enum reg_class cl, enum reg_class *new_class)
|
|
typically moves that have many alternatives, and restricting
|
|
reload pseudos for one alternative may lead to situations
|
|
where other reload pseudos are no longer allocatable. */
|
|
- || (INSN_UID (curr_insn) >= new_insn_uid_start
|
|
+ || (!allow_all_reload_class_changes_p
|
|
+ && INSN_UID (curr_insn) >= new_insn_uid_start
|
|
&& curr_insn_set != NULL
|
|
&& ((OBJECT_P (SET_SRC (curr_insn_set))
|
|
&& ! CONSTANT_P (SET_SRC (curr_insn_set)))
|
|
@@ -598,13 +604,12 @@ canonicalize_reload_addr (rtx addr)
|
|
return addr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
-/* Create a new pseudo using MODE, RCLASS, ORIGINAL or reuse already
|
|
- created input reload pseudo (only if TYPE is not OP_OUT). Don't
|
|
- reuse pseudo if IN_SUBREG_P is true and the reused pseudo should be
|
|
- wrapped up in SUBREG. The result pseudo is returned through
|
|
- RESULT_REG. Return TRUE if we created a new pseudo, FALSE if we
|
|
- reused the already created input reload pseudo. Use TITLE to
|
|
- describe new registers for debug purposes. */
|
|
+/* Create a new pseudo using MODE, RCLASS, ORIGINAL or reuse an existing
|
|
+ reload pseudo. Don't reuse an existing reload pseudo if IN_SUBREG_P
|
|
+ is true and the reused pseudo should be wrapped up in a SUBREG.
|
|
+ The result pseudo is returned through RESULT_REG. Return TRUE if we
|
|
+ created a new pseudo, FALSE if we reused an existing reload pseudo.
|
|
+ Use TITLE to describe new registers for debug purposes. */
|
|
static bool
|
|
get_reload_reg (enum op_type type, machine_mode mode, rtx original,
|
|
enum reg_class rclass, bool in_subreg_p,
|
|
@@ -616,6 +621,35 @@ get_reload_reg (enum op_type type, machine_mode mode, rtx original,
|
|
|
|
if (type == OP_OUT)
|
|
{
|
|
+ /* Output reload registers tend to start out with a conservative
|
|
+ choice of register class. Usually this is ALL_REGS, although
|
|
+ a target might narrow it (for performance reasons) through
|
|
+ targetm.preferred_reload_class. It's therefore quite common
|
|
+ for a reload instruction to require a more restrictive class
|
|
+ than the class that was originally assigned to the reload register.
|
|
+
|
|
+ In these situations, it's more efficient to refine the choice
|
|
+ of register class rather than create a second reload register.
|
|
+ This also helps to avoid cycling for registers that are only
|
|
+ used by reload instructions. */
|
|
+ if (REG_P (original)
|
|
+ && (int) REGNO (original) >= new_regno_start
|
|
+ && INSN_UID (curr_insn) >= new_insn_uid_start
|
|
+ && in_class_p (original, rclass, &new_class, true))
|
|
+ {
|
|
+ unsigned int regno = REGNO (original);
|
|
+ if (lra_dump_file != NULL)
|
|
+ {
|
|
+ fprintf (lra_dump_file, " Reuse r%d for output ", regno);
|
|
+ dump_value_slim (lra_dump_file, original, 1);
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ if (new_class != lra_get_allocno_class (regno))
|
|
+ lra_change_class (regno, new_class, ", change to", false);
|
|
+ if (lra_dump_file != NULL)
|
|
+ fprintf (lra_dump_file, "\n");
|
|
+ *result_reg = original;
|
|
+ return false;
|
|
+ }
|
|
*result_reg
|
|
= lra_create_new_reg_with_unique_value (mode, original, rclass, title);
|
|
return true;
|
|
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr96796.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr96796.c
|
|
new file mode 100644
|
|
index 00000000000..8808e62fe77
|
|
--- /dev/null
|
|
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr96796.c
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
|
+/* { dg-additional-options "-fcommon" } */
|
|
+
|
|
+struct S0 {
|
|
+ signed f0 : 8;
|
|
+ unsigned f1;
|
|
+ unsigned f4;
|
|
+};
|
|
+struct S1 {
|
|
+ long f3;
|
|
+ char f4;
|
|
+} g_3_4;
|
|
+
|
|
+int g_5, func_1_l_32, func_50___trans_tmp_31;
|
|
+static struct S0 g_144, g_834, g_1255, g_1261;
|
|
+
|
|
+int g_273[120] = {};
|
|
+int *g_555;
|
|
+char **g_979;
|
|
+static int g_1092_0;
|
|
+static int g_1193;
|
|
+int safe_mul_func_int16_t_s_s(int si1, int si2) { return si1 * si2; }
|
|
+static struct S0 *func_50();
|
|
+int func_1() { func_50(g_3_4, g_5, func_1_l_32, 8, 3); }
|
|
+void safe_div_func_int64_t_s_s(int *);
|
|
+void safe_mod_func_uint32_t_u_u(struct S0);
|
|
+struct S0 *func_50(int p_51, struct S0 p_52, struct S1 p_53, int p_54,
|
|
+ int p_55) {
|
|
+ int __trans_tmp_30;
|
|
+ char __trans_tmp_22;
|
|
+ short __trans_tmp_19;
|
|
+ long l_985_1;
|
|
+ long l_1191[8];
|
|
+ safe_div_func_int64_t_s_s(g_273);
|
|
+ __builtin_printf((char*)g_1261.f4);
|
|
+ safe_mod_func_uint32_t_u_u(g_834);
|
|
+ g_144.f0 += 1;
|
|
+ for (;;) {
|
|
+ struct S1 l_1350 = {&l_1350};
|
|
+ for (; p_53.f3; p_53.f3 -= 1)
|
|
+ for (; g_1193 <= 2; g_1193 += 1) {
|
|
+ __trans_tmp_19 = safe_mul_func_int16_t_s_s(l_1191[l_985_1 + p_53.f3],
|
|
+ p_55 % (**g_979 = 10));
|
|
+ __trans_tmp_22 = g_1255.f1 * p_53.f4;
|
|
+ __trans_tmp_30 = __trans_tmp_19 + __trans_tmp_22;
|
|
+ if (__trans_tmp_30)
|
|
+ g_1261.f0 = p_51;
|
|
+ else {
|
|
+ g_1255.f0 = p_53.f3;
|
|
+ int *l_1422 = g_834.f0 = g_144.f4 != (*l_1422)++ > 0 < 0 ^ 51;
|
|
+ g_555 = ~0;
|
|
+ g_1092_0 |= func_50___trans_tmp_31;
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ }
|
|
+ }
|
|
+}
|
|
--
|
|
2.18.4
|
|
|