Pavel Roskin 2456bfc6c3 busybox: lower priority to 15, below systemd and coreutils ... Busybox, systemd and coreutils all have priority 10. Busybox binaries have been observed to shadow systemd and coreutils binaries. If systemd is used, its binaries should be preferred, as they are aware of systemd. For instance, the busybox provided `reboot` cannot reboot NVidia Jetson AGX Xavier, whereas the systemd `reboot` can. This also gives busybox lower priority than coreutils. Busybox is meant for embedded systems with limited resources. If busybox and coreutils coexist, the resources are normally not an issue. Busybox should only shadow binaries that are known to be deficient. If anyone wants to prefer busybox (e.g. memory constrained system with plenty of non-volatile storage), it's up to them to prioritize busybox manually above coreutils, util-linux and other packages. It's not a common case.		2024-04-22 12:09:21 +02:00
..
busybox-in-store.patch
clang-cross.patch
default.nix	busybox: lower priority to 15, below systemd and coreutils	2024-04-22 12:09:21 +02:00
sandbox-shell.nix