Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"_MPCreateSemaphore", referenced from:
FX::FXSemaphore::FXSemaphore(int) in FXThread.o
FX::FXSemaphore::FXSemaphore(int) in FXThread.o
"_MPDeleteSemaphore", referenced from:
FX::FXSemaphore::~FXSemaphore() in FXThread.o
FX::FXSemaphore::~FXSemaphore() in FXThread.o
"_MPSignalSemaphore", referenced from:
FX::FXSemaphore::post() in FXThread.o
"_MPWaitOnSemaphore", referenced from:
FX::FXSemaphore::wait() in FXThread.o
FX::FXSemaphore::trywait() in FXThread.o
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
/cc ZHF #45961
* pkgs: refactor needless quoting of homepage meta attribute
A lot of packages are needlessly quoting the homepage meta attribute
(about 1400, 22%), this commit refactors all of those instances.
* pkgs: Fixing some links that were wrongfully unquoted in the previous
commit
* Fixed some instances
The following parameters are now available:
* hardeningDisable
To disable specific hardening flags
* hardeningEnable
To enable specific hardening flags
Only the cc-wrapper supports this right now, but these may be reused by
other wrappers, builders or setup hooks.
cc-wrapper supports the following flags:
* fortify
* stackprotector
* pie (disabled by default)
* pic
* strictoverflow
* format
* relro
* bindnow
(My OCD kicked in today...)
Remove repeated package names, capitalize first word, remove trailing
periods and move overlong descriptions to longDescription.
I also simplified some descriptions as well, when they were particularly
long or technical, often based on Arch Linux' package descriptions.
I've tried to stay away from generated expressions (and I think I
succeeded).
Some specifics worth mentioning:
* cron, has "Vixie Cron" in its description. The "Vixie" part is not
mentioned anywhere else. I kept it in a parenthesis at the end of the
description.
* ctags description started with "Exuberant Ctags ...", and the
"exuberant" part is not mentioned elsewhere. Kept it in a parenthesis
at the end of description.
* nix has the description "The Nix Deployment System". Since that
doesn't really say much what it is/does (especially after removing
the package name!), I changed that to "Powerful package manager that
makes package management reliable and reproducible" (borrowed from
nixos.org).
* Tons of "GNU Foo, Foo is a [the important bits]" descriptions
is changed to just [the important bits]. If the package name doesn't
contain GNU I don't think it's needed to say it in the description
either.
