Pull linode openapi spec from a fixed version in github, and so the
sha256 hash will not break on each new release of the api spec.
Replaced the hash for the openapi spec with a working hash.
Attempting to install linode-cli was failing, with the following
message:
hash mismatch in fixed-output derivation '/nix/store/px3cdbcb84bvw6xslr1k6hszyxpdis6j-openapi.yaml':
wanted: sha256:1l2fahdcmv7sp1qkwr5nv2vls8fypvlybwylqfzhyjmn7jqkw4hq
got: sha256:03ngzbq24zazfqmfd7xjmxixkcb9vv1jgamplsj633j7sjj708s0
cannot build derivation '/nix/store/49xrq47id66kwszyaqg1qapknc3i8mmx-linode-cli-2.14.1.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
Google moved their oslogin guest tools to another repository.
Point src to there, and bump to the latest version
There's now a Makefile, so we can avoid having our own custom
installPhase, and we also get manpages.
I successfully ran the oslogin tests, so assuming the google cloud
metadata server still behaves like in our test, logins should work.
I saw a nscd segfault, not sure if it's caused by this or was already
the case before.
It'd be great if someone could test this on an actual VM.
This is the bash that is being called when logging into the VM. This
fixes prompt escaping issues and also restores tab completion to the
logged-in user.
This reverts commit 7cb100b683.
See also #83432.
This appears to break at least the `container`-backend of `nixops`: when
running `switch-to-configuration` within `nixos-container run`, the
running `systemd`-instance gets reloaded which appears to kill the
`systemd-run` command and causes `nixos-container run` to hang.
The full issue is reported in the original PR[1].
[1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/67332#issuecomment-604145869
(cherry picked from commit 7f1ba606ac)
E.g. to create a container that runs the NixOS homepage:
$ nixos-container create homepage --flake nixos-homepage
And to upgrade it:
$ nixos-container update homepage
- Fix go build process to include critest as well.
- Fix GitHub repo location to be `kubernetes-sigs`
- Add me as maintainer
Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@suse.com>
I have a nixops network where I deploy containers using the `container`
backend which uses `nixos-container` intenrally to deploy several
containers to a certain host.
During that time I removed and added new containers and while trying to
deploy those to a different host I realized that it isn't guaranteed
that each container gets the same IP address which is a problem as some
parts of the deployment need to know which container is using which IP
(i.e. to configure port forwarding on the host).
With this change you can specify the container's IP like this (and don't
have to use the arbitrarily used 10.233.0.0/16 subnet):
```
$ nixos-container create test --config-file test-container.nix \
--local-address 10.235.1.2 --host-address 10.235.1.1
```
The latest changes to support better cross-compilation compatibility
have introduced a stricter handling of dependency specifications in
python. Since b4acd97, mock and nosetest should be checkInputs, since
they are used for testing.
Fixes: #56972
Mininet (https://github.com/mininet/mininet) is a popular network emulator that
glues several components such as network namespaces, traffic control
commands into a set of python bindings. It is then "easy" to describe a
topology and run experiments on it.
* treewide: http -> https sources
This updates the source urls of all top-level packages from http to
https where possible.
* buildtorrent: fix url and tab -> spaces
Semi-automatic update. These checks were done:
- built on NixOS
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/optimize_local_ssd -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/optimize_local_ssd --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/optimize_local_ssd help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/set_multiqueue -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/set_multiqueue --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/set_multiqueue help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/set_multiqueue -V` and found version 20180129
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/set_multiqueue -v` and found version 20180129
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/set_multiqueue --version` and found version 20180129
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/set_multiqueue version` and found version 20180129
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/set_multiqueue -h` and found version 20180129
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/set_multiqueue --help` and found version 20180129
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/set_multiqueue help` and found version 20180129
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_accounts_daemon-wrapped -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_accounts_daemon-wrapped --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_accounts_daemon -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_accounts_daemon --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_instance_setup-wrapped -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_instance_setup-wrapped --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_instance_setup -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_instance_setup --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_network_setup-wrapped -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_network_setup-wrapped --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_network_setup -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_network_setup --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_ip_forwarding_daemon-wrapped -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_ip_forwarding_daemon-wrapped --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_ip_forwarding_daemon-wrapped help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_ip_forwarding_daemon -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_ip_forwarding_daemon --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_ip_forwarding_daemon help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_clock_skew_daemon-wrapped -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_clock_skew_daemon-wrapped --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_clock_skew_daemon-wrapped help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_clock_skew_daemon -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_clock_skew_daemon --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_clock_skew_daemon help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_metadata_script_runner-wrapped -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/.google_metadata_script_runner-wrapped --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_metadata_script_runner -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129/bin/google_metadata_script_runner --help` got 0 exit code
- found 20180129 with grep in /nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129
- found 20180129 in filename of file in /nix/store/xxf54yjdmhkmsy5h0rrh985lygpi3sjv-google-compute-engine-20180129
only build on Linux
The containers local address can be given as ipv4 only or with a subnetmask in
CIDR notation in the container configuration, see [1]. This works fine but the
'nixos-container show-ip' only supports plain ipv4 addresses without the netmask
suffix.
Changed the regex to also match in case of a CIDR netmask suffix.
[1] 9939032e35/nixos/modules/virtualisation/containers.nix (L382)
* pkgs: refactor needless quoting of homepage meta attribute
A lot of packages are needlessly quoting the homepage meta attribute
(about 1400, 22%), this commit refactors all of those instances.
* pkgs: Fixing some links that were wrongfully unquoted in the previous
commit
* Fixed some instances
This reverts commit
c37e76b4d2. Unfortunately, using
"machinectl shell" has two bad side effects:
* It sends the command's stderr to stdout.
* It doesn't propagate the command's exit status.
This broke NixOps.
PR #18825.
This should be completely backwards compatible. It allows the '-f' part
of the nix-env command to be configured. This greatly eases using
nixos-container as part of development where several nixpkgs
repositories might be tested at the same time.
My earlier commit to have `nixos-container destroy` use `kill` broke
the `container-imperative` test, see[1]. As suggested by @aszlig,
`machinectl terminate` doesn't have that problem, and is the command
that should have been used to begin with rather then `kill`.
1| 60c6c7bc9a (commitcomment-18478032)
Using 'machinectl kill' is much faster then gracefully stopping the
container.
In the case of 'destroy', since we're destroying it anyway, there's no
reason to do a graceful shutdown.
This moves nixos-containers into its own package so that it can be
relied upon by other packages/systems. This should make development
using dynamic containers much easier.
In line with the Nixpkgs manual.
A mechanical change, done with this command:
find pkgs -name "*.nix" | \
while read f; do \
sed -e 's/description\s*=\s*"\([a-z]\)/description = "\u\1/' -i "$f"; \
done
I manually skipped some:
* Descriptions starting with an abbreviation, a user name or package name
* Frequently generated expressions (haskell-packages.nix)
