I was looking at
https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#buildpythonpackage-parameters to
import a Python package and noticed that the link for the `hooks` in
`pyproject` option is broken due to a typo (used <kbd>0</kbd> instead of
<kbd>)</kbd>).
Signed-off-by: Mihai Maruseac <mihai.maruseac@gmail.com>
Much like the previous commit that adds dependencies &
optional-dependencies this aligns PEP-517 build systems with how they
are defined in PEP-518/PEP-621.
The naming `build-system` (singular) is aligned with upstream Python standards.
Since https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/161835 we've had the
concept of `passthru.optional-dependencies` for Python optional deps.
Having to explicitly put optional-dependencies in the passthru attrset
is a bit strange API-wise, even though it semantically makes sense.
This change unifies the handling of non-optional & optional Python
dependencies using the names established from PEP-621 (standardized pyproject.toml project metadata).
There is an arbitrary mapping being done right now between
nixpkgs lua infrastructre and luarocks config schema.
This is confusing if you use lua so let's make it possible to use the
lua names in the nixpkgs, thanks to the lib.generators.toLua convertor.
The only nixpkgs thing to remember should be to put the config into `luarocksConfig`
`buildLuarocksPackage.extraVariables` should become `buildLuarocksPackage.luarocksConfig.variables`
I believe it would be helpful to better explain how to use
`nuget-to-nix` for those who aren't familar with the .NET ecosystem as I
was personally stumped on how to use it.
`lib.recursiveUpdate` indiscriminately recurses into all attribute sets,
also into derivations. This means that it is possible that evaluating a
derivation in the final haskell package set can cause something in
`prev.haskell` to be forced by `recursiveUpdate`, potentially causing an
evaluation error that should not happen.
It can be fixed using a well-crafted predicate for
`lib.recursiveUpdateUntil`, but most robust is just explicitly writing
out the desired merging manually.
lualatex assumes a writeable font cache relative to `$HOME`, for nix this has two implications.
First, the cache might diverge from the nix store if users use LuaLaTeX.
Second, `$HOME` needs to be set to a writable path in derivations.
It is fine to use `with` on the inputs, since that increases the
overall readability of the package.
Removes `wheel` from `nativeBuildInputs`, since it is a result of
cargo culting from an earlier setuptools example, that was wrong, and
it is not required, since it is provided by setuptools itself.
The python-updates branch was formerly called python-unstable, but the
new branch name was never mentioned in the docs. This commit changes the
branch name in the docs to python-updates.
We get a dependency list with pub2nix now. We can no longer easily distinguish between development dependency dependencies and regular dependency dependencies, but we weren't doing this anyway.
Fixes some mistakes regarding the references to cargoHash in the codes referenced.
Fixes a typo for cargoSha256.
States that cargoHash should be preferred.
Without this, it's impossible to override the lockFile as the default
overrideAttrs is applied after the composition in buildNimPackage has
read the lock file and generated the nim flags from it.
We keep running into situations where we can't get the right
combination of rustc flags through build systems into rustc.
RUSTFLAGS is the only variable supported across build systems, but if
RUSTFLAGS is set, Cargo will ignore all other ways of specifying rustc
flags, including the target-specific ones, which we need to make
dynamic musl builds work. (This is why pkgsCross.musl64.crosvm is
currently broken — it works if you unset separateDebugInfo, which
causes RUSTFLAGS not to be set.)
So, we need to do the same thing we do for C and C++ compilers, and
add a compiler wrapper so we can inject the flags we need, regardless
of the build system.
Currently the wrapper only supports a single mechanism for injecting
flags — the NIX_RUSTFLAGS environment variable. As time goes on,
we'll probably want to add additional features, like target-specific
environment variables.
While the word 'simply' is usually added to encourage readers, it often has the
opposite effect and may even appear condescending, especially when the reader
runs into trouble trying to apply the suggestions from the documentation. It is
almost always an improvement to simply drop the word from the sentence.
(there are more possible improvements like this, we can apply those in separate
PRs)
