- This release brings official support for Kernel 6.10
- Also update zfs_unstable as it would otherwise lag behind
- Upstream now links `zpool` completion, so only do so on older zfs
(since we still need to support 2.1.x)
Changelog: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-2.2.6
This removes the need to micromanage this value, instead we simply find
the correct one based on the existing kernelCompatible attr (though that
is now a function). This not only simplifies ZFS upgrades, but also
whenever Kernel versions are removed due to EOL.
Since this is *zfs_unstable*, & these patches are merged. It seems like
this could let folks test out 6.10 as others have had sucess while
setting the new bar to 6.9.
This just adds complexity and confusion. Once-upon-a-time, there was no
`package` and only `enableUnstable`, but now it is just confusing to
have both, as it would be possible to do e.g. `package = pkgs.zfs` and
`enableUnstable = true`, but then `enableUnstable` does nothing.
The `zfs` alias already has equivalent semantics. Instead, make this
like zfs_2_1 so folks who want to pin a specific release series can do
so easily and clearly to have more control over when more substantial
updates occur.
Rename all tests to match the pkg attr they are testing.
This adds compatibility with newer kernels, which fixes
nixosTests.zfs.series_2_1, which broke when the default kernel version
was bumped.
This means we no longer need the removeLinuxDRM option at all, but
I've kept it around as a no-op so people can leave it set in case the
same thing happens again in future.
ZFS no longer tries to use GPL-only symbols on aarch64.
Tested by building nixosTests.zfs.stable (modified to use Linux 6.6)
and nixosTests.zfs.unstable.
This re-introduces the old stable ZFS version we had in the past following
the many predicted issues of ZFS 2.2.x series, that is much more stable
than any further ZFS version at the moment.
I am also removing myself from maintenance of any further ZFS versions as I am
planning to quit ZFS maintenance at some point.
In the meantime, for users like me who depend on ZFS for critical operations, here is a ZFS version
that is known to work for LTS kernels.
It's still in kernels-org.json, because even if I remove it the update
script will keep putting it back, but nothing references it, and it'll
be removed from that file when kernels are next updated after it's
been delisted from kernel.org.
linux_testing_bcachefs still needs to be updated for >6.4, so for now
I've just inlined the Linux 6.4 definition in linux_testing_bcachefs's
definition.
