This avoids the potential conflict between autoconf flags and the waf
flags. There is some overlap between the two but waf errors when it
doesn’t recognize the flag.
He prefers to contribute to his own nixpkgs fork triton.
Since he is still marked as maintainer in many packages
this leaves the wrong impression he still maintains those.
Semi-automatic update. These checks were performed:
- built on NixOS
- ran `/nix/store/3dmmnilw4rsyrnz164vy04advblps0h5-tdb-1.3.15/bin/tdbdump -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/3dmmnilw4rsyrnz164vy04advblps0h5-tdb-1.3.15/bin/tdbbackup -h` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/3dmmnilw4rsyrnz164vy04advblps0h5-tdb-1.3.15/bin/tdbbackup --help` got 0 exit code
- ran `/nix/store/3dmmnilw4rsyrnz164vy04advblps0h5-tdb-1.3.15/bin/tdbbackup --help` and found version 1.3.15
- found 1.3.15 with grep in /nix/store/3dmmnilw4rsyrnz164vy04advblps0h5-tdb-1.3.15
- found 1.3.15 in filename of file in /nix/store/3dmmnilw4rsyrnz164vy04advblps0h5-tdb-1.3.15
cc "@wkennington"
(My OCD kicked in today...)
Remove repeated package names, capitalize first word, remove trailing
periods and move overlong descriptions to longDescription.
I also simplified some descriptions as well, when they were particularly
long or technical, often based on Arch Linux' package descriptions.
I've tried to stay away from generated expressions (and I think I
succeeded).
Some specifics worth mentioning:
* cron, has "Vixie Cron" in its description. The "Vixie" part is not
mentioned anywhere else. I kept it in a parenthesis at the end of the
description.
* ctags description started with "Exuberant Ctags ...", and the
"exuberant" part is not mentioned elsewhere. Kept it in a parenthesis
at the end of description.
* nix has the description "The Nix Deployment System". Since that
doesn't really say much what it is/does (especially after removing
the package name!), I changed that to "Powerful package manager that
makes package management reliable and reproducible" (borrowed from
nixos.org).
* Tons of "GNU Foo, Foo is a [the important bits]" descriptions
is changed to just [the important bits]. If the package name doesn't
contain GNU I don't think it's needed to say it in the description
either.
