Fixes#166833.
The build creates a symlink for this assuming it's present,
so be sure it's there when filtering the source for clang.
Alternatively we could use LLVM_EXTERNAL_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_SOURCE_DIR.
lld package provides an unwrapped lld. It doesn't always work on NixOS
(eg, it doesn't set rpath), and so dosen't always work.
What one should be using instead is the `lld` from
`llvmPackages.bintools` package. This super counterintutive.
One incremental step we can take here is to clarify that the `lld`
package is unrwapped -- right now, it looks like 100% legit thing one
should be using!
This seems to fix the notorious "CommandLine Error: Option 'xxxxx'
registered more than once!" error in applications that use both Mesa and
ROCm.
Since Mesa is built with llvmPackages_latest and ROCm stuff is built
with llvmPackages_rocm, applications that use both (such as Blender) end
up with two different `libLLVM*.so`s loaded, which breaks things.
This seems like a straightforward way to fix the problem, and since the
ROCm stack seems to be the only thing in Nixpkgs that uses
llvmPackages_rocm this hopefully shouldn't break anything.
While there might be another way to fix this problem that doesn't
require disabling the shared libraries, I haven't been able to find it
yet, and since this issue seems to affect a lot of people I think it
might make sense to merge this fix for now and revisit it later if a
better solution is found.
This also removes a small patch to rocm-comgr since there are no longer
LLVM shared libraries for it to link against.
Reduces closure size by ~240MiB (down to ~100MiB) for
LLVM 13, the others are similar.
Having those archives in the lib output makes no sense
as they are no runtime dependencies. Removing them
alltogether is also not an option because the dynamic
libraries offer only the C API while many users of
libllvm require the C++ API. Those users must have an
dependency on libllvm.dev anyway and will find those
files for linking.
This fixes a CI warning [0]:
Run cat "$HOME/changed_files" | xargs -r editorconfig-checker -disable-indent-size
pkgs/development/compilers/llvm/14/lld/default.nix:
28: Wrong indent style found (tabs instead of spaces)
29: Wrong indent style found (tabs instead of spaces)
30: Wrong indent style found (tabs instead of spaces)
[0]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/runs/5351700772
substituteStream(): WARNING: pattern '# define _LIBCPP_USE_AVAILABILITY_APPLE' doesn't match anything in file 'include/__config'
The new mechanism for those is a cmake option
LIBCXX_ENABLE_VENDOR_AVAILABILITY_ANNOTATIONS that is off by default:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90843
libcxxClang still depends on cc wrapper's gccForLibs for libgcc which is
not available when useLLVM is set. In such cases we need to switch to
clangUseLLVM and (try) to use compiler-rt instead.
Resolves#153759: pkgsLLVM.llvmPackages.stdenv now correctly
clangUseLLVM as cc, allowing compilation to work as expected.
llvmPackages_*.clang should check the default compiler for the package
set it is targeting (targetPackages.stdenv.cc) instead of the compiler
that has been used to build it (stdenv.cc) in order to get some sense of
whether to use libc++ or libstdc++.
Since we are now inspecting targetPackages in the llvmPackages.clang
attribute, we need to avoid using it in the cross stdenv — which just
forces us to explicitly request libcxxClang for darwin instead of
relying on the clang attribute to pick it for us.
We also need to do something similar for targetPackages.stdenv.cc: Here
the llvmPackages.clang logic would work as we want (inspect
targetPackages.stdenv.cc and if it doesn't exist, make the choice based
on stdenv.cc), but it gets locked in a cycle with the previous package.
We can easily break this, however: We know that the previous set had
clang and the next one doesn't exist, so we'd choose libcxxClang any day
of the week.
LLVM 12 added the memory profiling runtime and LLVM 13 the ORC
runtime. Both need a libc in order to build (or at least headers not
present in clang's resource root), so we'll disable them for any sort of
baremetal-ish build. memprof likely doesn't work in a baremetal
situation at all, orc is unknown. Whether both would compile with musl
is to be checked.
