This subtest actually serves two purposes:
1. Test manual PKI configuration
2. Test changing of configuration files
In order to only test manual PKI configuration it would have been enough
to just add another server with a manual config.
But as the switch from automatic PKI config to manual config is probably
one of the most fundamental changes in configuration, so it serves
*very* well to also check whether changes in the NixOS configuration
actually have an impact in the real system.
So instead of adding another server, we now create a dummy "newServer"
machine, which is the new configuration for "server" and use
switch-to-configuration to switch "server" to the config of "newServer".
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Putting an include directive in the configuration file referencing a
store path with the real configuration file has the disavantage that
once we change the real configuration file the store path is also a
different one.
So we would have to replace that include directive with the new
configuration file, which is very much error-prone, because whenever
taskd modifies the configuration file on its own it generates a new one
with *only* the key/value options and without any include directives.
Another problem is that we only added the include directive on the first
initalization, so whenever there is *any* configuration change, it won't
affect anything.
We're now passing all the configuration options via command line,
because taskd treats everything in the form of --<name>=<value> to be a
configuration directive.
This also has the effect that we now no longer have extraConfig, because
configuration isn't a file anymore.
Instead we now have an attribute set that is mapped down to
configuration options.
Unfortunately this isn't so easy with the way taskd is configured,
because there is an option called "server" and also other options like
"server.cert", "server.key" and so on, which do not map very well to
attribute sets.
So we have an exception for the "server" option, which is now called
"server.listen", because it specifies the listening address.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Fixes: #22705
The helper tool so far was only intended for use in automatic PKI
handling, but it also is very useful if you have an existing CA.
One of the main advantages is that you don't need to specify the data
directory anymore and the right permissions are also handled as well.
Another advantage is that we now have an uniform management tool for
both automatic and manual config, so the documentation in the NixOS
manual now applies to the manual PKI config as well.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
The error message displays that a specific user doesn't exist in an
organisation, but uses the User object's name attribute to show which
user it was.
This is basically a very stupid chicken and egg problem and easily fixed
by using the user name provided on the command line.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
A long-time issue and one of the reasons I've never used that function
before. So let's remove that todo-comment and escape the contents
properly.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Cc: @edolstra
Since the bonds interface changed to a lot more possible values we create a
mapping of kernel bond attribute names and values to networkd attributes.
Those match for the most part, but have to transformed slightly.
There is also an assert that unknown options won’t slip through silently.
Until now the four attributes available very selectively provided a small
subset, while copying upstream documentation.
We make driver options an arbitrary key-value set and point to kernel
documentation, which is always up-to-date. This way every option can be set.
The four already existing options are deprecated with a warning.
The initialization code is now a systemd service that explicitly
waits for network-online, so the occasional failure I was seeing
because the `nixos-rebuild` couldn't get anything from the binary
cache should stop. I hope!
* The source attribute is mandatory, not optional
* The program attribute is optional
* Move the info about the mandatory attribute first (most important,
IMHO)
