The current postStart code holds Jenkins off the "started" state until
Jenkins becomes idle. But it should be enough to wait until Jenkins
start handling HTTP requests to consider it "started".
More reasons why the current approach is bad and we should remove it,
from @coreyoconnor in
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/14991#issuecomment-216572571:
1. Repeatedly curling for a specific human-readable string to
determine "Active" is fragile. For instance, what happens when jenkins
is localized?
2. The time jenkins takes to initializes is variable. This (at least
used to) depend on the number of jobs and any plugin upgrades requested.
3. Jenkins can be requested to restart from the UI. Which will not
affect the status of the service. This means that the service being
"active" does not imply jenkins is initialized. Downstream services
cannot assume jenkins is initialized if the service is active. Might
as well accept that and remove the initialized test from service
startup.
Fixes#14991.
- add missing types in module definitions
- add missing 'defaultText' in module definitions
- wrap example with 'literalExample' where necessary in module definitions
I think the name 'listenAddress' is more descriptive. Other NixOS
modules that define 'host' either use it as listen address or as address
a client connects to. listenAddress is unambiguous.
The addition of 'host' was added earlier today[1], so not bothering with
./nixos/modules/rename.nix.
[1]: 44ea184997 ("jenkins ci enhancement: add port and prefix option")
As named these options enable to specify a bind host and url prefix
to be used by jenkins. Adding these options in the config rather than
using extra arguments allows us to re-use those information in other
services using jenkins such as jenkins-job-builder or a reverse proxy.
The most complex problems were from dealing with switches reverted in
the meantime (gcc5, gmp6, ncurses6).
It's likely that darwin is (still) broken nontrivially.
This option allows to define (declarative) Jenkins jobs, using Jenkins
Job Builder (JJB) as backend.
Example:
services.jenkins = {
enable = true;
jobBuilder = {
enable = true;
yamlJobs = ''
- job:
name: jenkins-job-test
builders:
- shell: echo 'Hello world!'
'';
};
};
Jobs can be defined using YAML, JSON and Nix.
Note that it really is declarative configuration; if you remove a
previously defined job, the module will remove the jobdir under
$JENKINS_HOME.
Jobs managed through the Jenkins WebUI (or by other means) are not
touched by this module.
Changes v1 -> v2:
* add nixJobs
* let jsonJobs take a list of strings (allows merge)
* 4 space indent in shell code
Jenkins gets (by default) an additional environment of
{ NIX_REMOTE = "daemon"; }
This has the following problems:
1. NIX_REMOTE disappears when users specify additional environment
variables, because defaults have low merge priority.
2. nix cannot be used without additional NIX_PATH envvar, which is
currently missing.
3. If you try to use HTTPS, you'll see that jenkins lacks
SSL_CERT_FILE envvar, causing it to fail.
This commit adds config.environment.sessionVariables and NIX_REMOTE to
the set of variables that are always there for jenkins, making nix and
HTTPS work out of the box.
services.jenkins.environment is now empty by default.
Using pkgs.lib on the spine of module evaluation is problematic
because the pkgs argument depends on the result of module
evaluation. To prevent an infinite recursion, pkgs and some of the
modules are evaluated twice, which is inefficient. Using ‘with lib’
prevents this problem.
Uses standard NixOS user config merging.
Work in progress: The slave config does not actually start the slave agent. This just configures a
jenkins user if required. Bare minimum to enable a nice jenkins SSH slave.
By default the jenkins server is executed under the user "jenkins". Which can be configured using
users.jenkins.* options. If a different user is requested by changing services.jenkins.user then
none of the users.jenkins options apply.
This patch does not include jenkins slave configuration. Some config options will probably change
when this is implemented.
Aspects like the user and environment are typically identical between slave and master. The service
configs are different. The design is for users.jenkins to cover the shared aspects while
services.jenkins and services.jenkins-slave cover the master and slave specific aspects,
respectively.
Another option would be to place everything under services.jenkins and have a config that selects
master vs slave.
