Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Las Safin
41d9dfb619 meson: Remove 0.57, use 0.60 everywhere 2022-01-11 12:51:09 +00:00
AndersonTorres
1a53eeda71 meson: put 0.57 in a subdirectory
Meson is a delicate package. It needs some patches to properly work in Nixpkgs
and many packages have it as a dependency, from many small applications to
systemd (yay, mass rebuilds in sight!). Updating it is not a trivial and
harmless task.

Therefore, I took the paranoid way and encapsulate the current version in a
subdir, instead of the regular write-over procedure. This way, at the best we
can just remove the whole dir in the future, and at the worse we just maintain
duplicated code.
2021-12-14 16:37:25 -03:00
Vladimír Čunát
89023c38fc
Recover the complicated situation after my bad merge
I made a mistake merge.  Reverting it in c778945806 undid the state
on master, but now I realize it crippled the git merge mechanism.
As the merge contained a mix of commits from `master..staging-next`
and other commits from `staging-next..staging`, it got the
`staging-next` branch into a state that was difficult to recover.

I reconstructed the "desired" state of staging-next tree by:
 - checking out the last commit of the problematic range: 4effe769e2
 - `git rebase -i --preserve-merges a8a018ddc0` - dropping the mistaken
   merge commit and its revert from that range (while keeping
   reapplication from 4effe769e2)
 - merging the last unaffected staging-next commit (803ca85c20)
 - fortunately no other commits have been pushed to staging-next yet
 - applying a diff on staging-next to get it into that state
2020-10-26 09:01:04 +01:00
Vladimír Čunát
c778945806
Revert "Merge #101508: libraw: 0.20.0 -> 0.20.2"
I'm sorry; I didn't notice it contained staging commits.

This reverts commit 17f5305b6c, reversing
changes made to a8a018ddc0.
2020-10-25 09:41:51 +01:00
Niklas Hambüchen
70a924fa80 meson: Patch out default boost search paths. See #86131.
Avoids impure builds on unsandboxed non-NixOS builds, see:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/86131#issuecomment-711051774
2020-10-20 21:02:43 +02:00