The `logger` binary from `util-linux` should be the priority. This has
been the default for many linux distributions. To instead prioritize
this package, set a _lower_ `meta.priority`, or use e.g.
lib.setPrio 5 inetutils
This is a workaround to avoid mass rebuilds in staging-next. The problem
is the 10.12 source-based SDK does not include `utmp.h`, but it should.
Another PR will fix that for the next staging cycle and revert this commit.
I guess with #181764 this might've broken for cross.
Perl propagates libxcrypt, but is only listed in nativeBuildInputs.
List libxcrypt in buildInputs to ensure it's picked up properly.
- Remove the already upstream-ed (or not applicable anymore) patches
- Add patches to update .ORG, and .IN WHOIS servers (submitted upstream)
- Split name into pname, and version
- Switch to .xz distfile (smaller)
This reverts commit fb6d63f3fd.
I really hope this finally fixes#99236: evaluation on Hydra.
This time I really did check basically the same commit on Hydra:
https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1618011
Right now I don't have energy to find what exactly is wrong in the
commit, and it doesn't seem important in comparison to nixos-unstable
channel being stuck on a commit over one week old.
Cherry-picked from upstream (inetutils-1_9_4-31-g73e2811).
Could be a long time before a new inetutils release is made.
vcunat amended the patch to apply.
(My OCD kicked in today...)
Remove repeated package names, capitalize first word, remove trailing
periods and move overlong descriptions to longDescription.
I also simplified some descriptions as well, when they were particularly
long or technical, often based on Arch Linux' package descriptions.
I've tried to stay away from generated expressions (and I think I
succeeded).
Some specifics worth mentioning:
* cron, has "Vixie Cron" in its description. The "Vixie" part is not
mentioned anywhere else. I kept it in a parenthesis at the end of the
description.
* ctags description started with "Exuberant Ctags ...", and the
"exuberant" part is not mentioned elsewhere. Kept it in a parenthesis
at the end of description.
* nix has the description "The Nix Deployment System". Since that
doesn't really say much what it is/does (especially after removing
the package name!), I changed that to "Powerful package manager that
makes package management reliable and reproducible" (borrowed from
nixos.org).
* Tons of "GNU Foo, Foo is a [the important bits]" descriptions
is changed to just [the important bits]. If the package name doesn't
contain GNU I don't think it's needed to say it in the description
either.
