OpenBSD loves hardcoding paths to programs.
The only example of this in `bsd.obj.mk` is `/bin/pwd`,
so `substituteInPlace` is fine.
Co-Authored-By: Audrey Dutcher <audrey@rhelmot.io>
OpenBSD does not provide a compatibility library for running
build tools on other OSes, but we still need one.
`openbsd.compat` inspired by the `freebsd.compat` package and provides
a header-only compatibility layer that can be used across multiple
openbsd build packages. The source is included in the nixpkgs tree
because it functions similarly to per-package patches.
`openbsd.compatHook` provides a build hook that can be added into
`extraNativeBuildInputs` to include `compat` in the library search
path as a system library.
Some packages require extra hooks or tools.
Rather than overriding all of the nativeBuildInputs
and needing to specify all of them, add a field so that
we just need to specify inputs that are not always required.
Co-Authored-By: Audrey Dutcher <audrey@rhelmot.io>
OpenBSD's makefs is used to create filesystem images for ramdisks
or VM/install images. The build was fixed with a patch instead of
adding to `compat` because `makefs` relies heavily on unintended
and undocumted transitive header inclusions. Fixing with `compat`
causes hard-to-debug header loops.
Co-Authored-By: Audrey Dutcher <audrey@rhelmot.io>
This stand package builds all variants of OpenBSD's
`stand` bootloader, including both UEFI and BIOS versions.
This package will likely need changes if we ever support
`aarch64-openbsd`, but that isn't even a target yet.
Co-Authored-By: Audrey Dutcher <audrey@rhelmot.io>
rtld contains ld.so, the dynamic linker on OpenBSD.
This package does not include related scripts (ldd and ldconfig),
because they would create a dependency loop.
rtld (run-time ld) is an os-agnostic term for dynamic linker.
For simplicity, also link this into the libc symlinkJoin package
bsd.prog.mk makes sure libc is built before programs that use it by
making all programs depend on core files.
We handle this dependency by referencing libc in cc-wrapper,
but that isn't sufficient to tell bsd.prog.mk that e.g. crtbegin.o
exists.
Clear libc-related variables to fix OpenBSD program build
For a long time, we've had `crossLibcStdenv`, `*Cross` libc attributes,
and `*bsdCross` pre-libc package sets. This was always bad because
having "cross" things is "not declarative": the naming doesn't reflect
what packages *need* but rather how we *provide* something. This is
ugly, and creates needless friction between cross and native building.
Now, almost all of these `*Cross` attributes are gone: just these are
kept:
- Glibc's and Musl's are kept, because those packages are widely used
and I didn't want to risk changing the native builds of those at this
time.
- generic `libcCross`, `theadsCross`, and friends, because these relate
to the convolulted GCC bootstrap which still needs to be redone.
The BSD and obscure Linux or freestnanding libcs have conversely all
been made to use a new `stdenvNoLibc`, which is like the old
`crossLibcStdenv` except:
1. It usable for native and cross alike
2. It named according to what it *is* ("a standard environment without
libc but with a C compiler"), rather than some non-compositional
jargon ("the stdenv used for building libc when cross compiling",
yuck).
I should have done this change long ago, but I was stymied because of
"infinite recursions". The problem was that in too many cases we are
overriding `stdenv` to *remove* things we don't need, and this risks
cyles since those more minimal stdenvs are used to build things in the
more maximal stdenvs.
The solution is to pass `stage.nix` `stdenvNoCC`, so we can override to
*build up* rather than *tear down*. For now, the full `stdenv` is also
passed, so I don't need to change the native bootstraps, but I can see
this changing as we make things more uniform and clean those up.
(adapted from commit 51f1ecaa59)
(adapted from commit 1743662e55)
I realized what rhelmot did in 61202561d9
(specify what packages just need `stdenvNoLibc`) is definitely the right
approach for this, and adjusted NetBSD and OpenBSD to likewise use it.
With that change, we don't need these confusing and ugly `*bsdCross`
package sets at all!
We can get rid of a lot more libc-related `*Cross`, and I will do so
soon, but this is the first step.
(adapted from commit 51f1ecaa59)
For a long time, we've had `crossLibcStdenv`, `*Cross` libc attributes,
and `*bsdCross` pre-libc package sets. This was always bad because
having "cross" things is "not declarative": the naming doesn't reflect
what packages *need* but rather how we *provide* something. This is
ugly, and creates needless friction between cross and native building.
Now, almost all of these `*Cross` attributes are gone: just these are
kept:
- Glibc's and Musl's are kept, because those packages are widely used
and I didn't want to risk changing the native builds of those at this
time.
- generic `libcCross`, `theadsCross`, and friends, because these relate
to the convolulted GCC bootstrap which still needs to be redone.
The BSD and obscure Linux or freestnanding libcs have conversely all
been made to use a new `stdenvNoLibc`, which is like the old
`crossLibcStdenv` except:
1. It usable for native and cross alike
2. It named according to what it *is* ("a standard environment without
libc but with a C compiler"), rather than some non-compositional
jargon ("the stdenv used for building libc when cross compiling",
yuck).
I should have done this change long ago, but I was stymied because of
"infinite recursions". The problem was that in too many cases we are
overriding `stdenv` to *remove* things we don't need, and this risks
cyles since those more minimal stdenvs are used to build things in the
more maximal stdenvs.
The solution is to pass `stage.nix` `stdenvNoCC`, so we can override to
*build up* rather than *tear down*. For now, the full `stdenv` is also
passed, so I don't need to change the native bootstraps, but I can see
this changing as we make things more uniform and clean those up.
Finally, the BSDs also had to be cleaned up, since they have a few
pre-libc dependencies, demanding a systematic approach. I realized what
rhelmot did in 61202561d9 (specify what
packages just need `stdenvNoLibc`) is definitely the right approach for
this, and adjusted NetBSD and OpenBSD to likewise use it.
Adds a couple of useful NetBSD and OpenBSD derivations. Some of these
will be integrated into Nixpkgs later.
Noncomprehensive list:
- netbsd.getent
- netbsd.getconf
- netbsd.fts
- openbsd.mg
- netbsd.compat (can replace libbsd)
