`For android 'sdkVer' has been renamed to 'androidSdkVersion'`
While doing the above rename I forgot to consider if there were still
darwin platforms in `lib.systems.examples` using `sdkVer`
These still fail eval, but that happened before the renaming too.
`error: Unsupported sdk: 14.3`
Those attrs have been renamed and throwing is the best way to show it,
if we only warned then the user would only get an error like this `error: Unsupported sdk: 33`
from `pkgs/top-level/darwin-packages.nix`.
If someone wants to support multiple NixOS versions then they can simply
set both attrs. (`!args ? androidSdkVersion` is for that)
`sdkVer` conflicts with the old `sdkVer`(now `darwinSdkVersion` but that still uses `sdkVer` if set) used by darwin
This shouldn't be an issue but due to `pkgs/development/interpreters/python/cpython/default.nix`
running `lib.filterAttrs (n: v: ! lib.isDerivation v && n != "passthruFun")` on it's inputs (2 of them are darwin only)
the `throw "Unsupported sdk...` in `pkgs/top-level/darwin-packages.nix` will be triggered.
After this change `pkgsCross.armv7a-android-prebuilt.python3.pythonOnBuildForHost` won't fail with
`error: Unsupported sdk: 33`
Issue was bisected to 3cb23cec23
`rustc.config` is called `rust.rustcTarget` now, and
`{rustc -> rust}.platform`.
This is the new way (tm), and is preferred since
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/271707 -
though the documentation still is outdated, and some expressions in
nixpkgs were using the old interface.
This updates both.
We have several cross-compilation bugs that show up if
hostPlatform!=buildPlatform yet
hostPlatform.config==buildPlatform.config.
These bugs have appeared and disappeared as we've fiddled with the
definition of equality for platform objects. This commit adds a
clear-cut case where they are *not* equal and never will be, so we
can test it.
The Minimalist Gnu for Windows distribution comes with support for
the traditional msvcrt libc, as well as ucrt64 libc. The latter
being the newer universal compiler runtime. We follow the msys2
environment naming convention[1]:
| name | toolchain | arch | libc | libc++ |
|------------|-----------|---------|--------|-----------|
| mingw32 | gcc | i686 | msvcrt | libstdc++ |
| mingw64 | gcc | x86_64 | msvcrt | libstdc++ |
| ucrt64 | gcc | x86_64 | ucrt | libstdc++ |
| clang32 | llvm | i686 | ucrt | libc++ |
| clang64 | llvm | x86_64 | ucrt | libc++ |
| clangarm64 | llvm | aarch64 | ucrt | libc++ |
For now nixpkgs only supports the first three with this commit.
--
[1]: https://www.msys2.org/docs/environments/
Add support for Nvidia's Bluefield 2 plattform as a compilation
target. There exists a version with and without crypto support,
while the crypto supported version is the most common one.
Support for the non-crypto version can be easily added in the future,
if needed.
For a datasheet of the hardware, see:
https://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/en-zz/Solutions/Data-Center/documents/datasheet-nvidia-bluefield-2-dpu.pdf
Signed-off-by: Markus Theil <theil.markus@gmail.com>
- Christmas is over!
- Upstream has changed the name of the target triplet used for the JS
backend from js-unknown-ghcjs to javascript-unknown-ghcjs, since Cabal
calls the architecture "javascript":
6636b67023
Since the triplet is made up anyways, i.e. autoconf does not support
it and Rust uses different triplets for its emscripten backends, we'll
just change it as well.
- Upstream fixed the problem with ar(1) being invoked incorrectly by stage0:
e987e345c8
A tricky thing about FreeBSD is that there is no stable ABI across
versions. That means that putting in the version as part of the config
string is paramount.
We have a parsed represenation that separates name versus version to
accomplish this. We include FreeBSD versions 12 and 13 to demonstrate
how it works.
In Nixpkgs, we assume that the "config" field is a canonicalized GNU
triple. I noticed that non-canonical values were being used here,
because the pkgsCross.mips64el-linux-gnu triples did not contain the
vendor field, but the pkgsCross.mips64el-linux-gnu.pkgsStatic did.
Here, I've run all the MIPS triples in lib.systems.examples through
config.sub to canonicalize them. I think this will avoid nasty
surprises in future.
Tested by building Nix and the bootstrap files for
pkgsCross.mips64el-linux-gnu.
This has been deprecated for a long time, and it's doubtful it had any
users to start with. And having an undisablable warning when
enumarating platforms is not good.
These servers apparently no longer exist, since September 2, 2021[1].
If somebody needs this for non-Scaleway machines, they should suggest
its reintroduction with a different name.
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27192757
MIPS has a large space of {architecture,abi,endianness}; this commit
adds all of them to lib/systems/platforms.nix so we can be done with
it.
Currently lib/systems/inspect.nix has a single "isMips" predicate,
which is a bit ambiguous now that we will have both mips32 and mips64
support, with the latter having two ABIs. Let's add four new
predicates (isMips32, isMips64, isMips64n32, and isMips64n64) and
treat the now-ambiguous isMips as deprecated in favor of the
more-specific predicates. These predicates are used mainly for
enabling/disabling target-specific workarounds, and it is extremely
rare that a platform-specific workaround is needed, and both mips32
and mips64 need exactly the same workaround.
The separate predicates (isMips64n32 and isMips64n64) for ABI
distinctions are, unfortunately, useful. Boost's user-scheduled
threading (used by nix) does does not currently supports mips64n32,
which is a very desirable ABI on routers since they rarely have
more than 2**32 bytes of DRAM.
This PR adds a new aarch64 android toolchain, which leverages the
existing crossSystem infrastructure and LLVM builders to generate a
working toolchain with minimal prebuilt components.
The only thing that is prebuilt is the bionic libc. This is because it
is practically impossible to compile bionic outside of an AOSP tree. I
tried and failed, braver souls may prevail. For now I just grab the
relevant binaries from https://android.googlesource.com/.
I also grab the msm kernel sources from there to generate headers. I've
included a minor patch to the existing kernel-headers derivation in
order to expose an internal function.
Everything else, from binutils up, is using stock code. Many thanks to
@Ericson2314 for his help on this, and for building such a powerful
system in the first place!
One motivation for this is to be able to build a toolchain which will
work on an aarch64 linux machine. To my knowledge, there is no existing
toolchain for an aarch64-linux builder and an aarch64-android target.
