nordic-dev.net/nixpkgs
nordic-dev.net/nixpkgs
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs.git synced 2024-11-01 15:11:25 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
fb65a0048a
nixpkgs/nixos/tests/chromium.nix

168 lines
4.6 KiB
Nix
Raw Normal View History

nixos/tests/chromium: Split up into subtests This makes it easier to test just a specific channel rather than to force testing all builds down the users/testers throat. Especially this makes it easier to test NixOS channel upgrades only against the Chromium stable channel instead of just removing the beta/dev channels from the tests entirely (as done in 69ec09f38aa1f1d37baec73ebdf9cf5f21050f94). Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2016-02-29 23:20:27 +00:00
{ system ? builtins.currentSystem }:
with import ../lib/testing.nix { inherit system; };
with pkgs.lib;
mapAttrs (channel: chromiumPkg: makeTest rec {
name = "chromium-${channel}";
all tests: added meta.maintainers section
2015-07-12 10:09:40 +00:00
meta = with pkgs.stdenv.lib.maintainers; {
maintainers = [ aszlig ];
};
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
nixos/tests/chromium: Detect popup using OCR. This will make the test a lot more reliable, because we no longer need to press ESC multiple times hoping that it will close the popup. Unfortunately in order to run this test I needed to locally revert the gyp update from a305e6855dd8723683c77635f45ae28411c8f36c. With the old gyp version however the test runs fine and it's able to properly detect the popup. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2015-05-22 09:23:09 +00:00
enableOCR = true;
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
machine.imports = [ ./common/x11.nix ];
Grmbl http://hydra.nixos.org/build/24983009
2015-08-25 09:26:32 +00:00
machine.virtualisation.memorySize = 2047;
nixos/tests/chromium: Split up into subtests This makes it easier to test just a specific channel rather than to force testing all builds down the users/testers throat. Especially this makes it easier to test NixOS channel upgrades only against the Chromium stable channel instead of just removing the beta/dev channels from the tests entirely (as done in 69ec09f38aa1f1d37baec73ebdf9cf5f21050f94). Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2016-02-29 23:20:27 +00:00
machine.environment.systemPackages = [ chromiumPkg ];
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
startupHTML = pkgs.writeText "chromium-startup.html" ''
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Chromium startup notifier</title>
</head>
<body onload="javascript:document.title='startup done'">
<img src="file://${pkgs.fetchurl {
tests-chromium: fix link to svg file closes #11208
2015-11-29 21:43:28 +00:00
url = "http://nixos.org/logo/nixos-hex.svg";
sha256 = "0wxpp65npdw2cg8m0cxc9qff1sb3b478cxpg1741d8951g948rg8";
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
}}" />
</body>
</html>
'';
testScript = let
xdo = name: text: let
xdoScript = pkgs.writeText "${name}.xdo" text;
in "${pkgs.xdotool}/bin/xdotool '${xdoScript}'";
in ''
sub createNewWin {
$machine->nest("creating a new Chromium window", sub {
$machine->execute("${xdo "new-window" ''
search --onlyvisible --name "startup done"
windowfocus --sync
windowactivate --sync
xdotool: 2.20110530.1 -> 3.20150503.1
2015-09-12 10:12:57 +00:00
''}");
$machine->execute("${xdo "new-window" ''
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
key Ctrl+n
''}");
});
}
sub closeWin {
Machine::retry sub {
$machine->execute("${xdo "close-window" ''
search --onlyvisible --name "new tab"
windowfocus --sync
windowactivate --sync
xdotool: 2.20110530.1 -> 3.20150503.1
2015-09-12 10:12:57 +00:00
''}");
$machine->execute("${xdo "close-window" ''
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
key Ctrl+w
''}");
for (1..20) {
my ($status, $out) = $machine->execute("${xdo "wait-for-close" ''
search --onlyvisible --name "new tab"
''}");
return 1 if $status != 0;
$machine->sleep(1);
}
}
}
sub waitForNewWin {
my $ret = 0;
$machine->nest("waiting for new Chromium window to appear", sub {
for (1..20) {
my ($status, $out) = $machine->execute("${xdo "wait-for-window" ''
search --onlyvisible --name "new tab"
windowfocus --sync
windowactivate --sync
''}");
if ($status == 0) {
$ret = 1;
last;
}
$machine->sleep(1);
}
});
return $ret;
}
sub createAndWaitForNewWin {
for (1..3) {
createNewWin;
return 1 if waitForNewWin;
}
die "new window didn't appear within 60 seconds";
}
sub testNewWin {
my ($desc, $code) = @_;
createAndWaitForNewWin;
subtest($desc, $code);
closeWin;
}
nixos/tests/chromium: Split up into subtests This makes it easier to test just a specific channel rather than to force testing all builds down the users/testers throat. Especially this makes it easier to test NixOS channel upgrades only against the Chromium stable channel instead of just removing the beta/dev channels from the tests entirely (as done in 69ec09f38aa1f1d37baec73ebdf9cf5f21050f94). Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2016-02-29 23:20:27 +00:00
$machine->waitForX;
my $url = "file://${startupHTML}";
my $args = "--user-data-dir=/tmp/chromium-${channel}";
$machine->execute(
"ulimit -c unlimited; ".
"chromium $args \"$url\" & disown"
);
$machine->waitForText(qr/Type to search or enter a URL to navigate/);
$machine->waitUntilSucceeds("${xdo "check-startup" ''
search --sync --onlyvisible --name "startup done"
# close first start help popup
key -delay 1000 Escape
windowfocus --sync
windowactivate --sync
''}");
createAndWaitForNewWin;
$machine->screenshot("empty_windows");
closeWin;
$machine->screenshot("startup_done");
testNewWin "check sandbox", sub {
$machine->succeed("${xdo "type-url" ''
search --sync --onlyvisible --name "new tab"
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
windowfocus --sync
nixos/tests/chromium: Split up into subtests This makes it easier to test just a specific channel rather than to force testing all builds down the users/testers throat. Especially this makes it easier to test NixOS channel upgrades only against the Chromium stable channel instead of just removing the beta/dev channels from the tests entirely (as done in 69ec09f38aa1f1d37baec73ebdf9cf5f21050f94). Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2016-02-29 23:20:27 +00:00
type --delay 1000 "chrome://sandbox"
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
''}");
nixos/tests/chromium: Split up into subtests This makes it easier to test just a specific channel rather than to force testing all builds down the users/testers throat. Especially this makes it easier to test NixOS channel upgrades only against the Chromium stable channel instead of just removing the beta/dev channels from the tests entirely (as done in 69ec09f38aa1f1d37baec73ebdf9cf5f21050f94). Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2016-02-29 23:20:27 +00:00
$machine->succeed("${xdo "submit-url" ''
search --sync --onlyvisible --name "new tab"
windowfocus --sync
key --delay 1000 Return
''}");
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
nixos/tests/chromium: Split up into subtests This makes it easier to test just a specific channel rather than to force testing all builds down the users/testers throat. Especially this makes it easier to test NixOS channel upgrades only against the Chromium stable channel instead of just removing the beta/dev channels from the tests entirely (as done in 69ec09f38aa1f1d37baec73ebdf9cf5f21050f94). Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2016-02-29 23:20:27 +00:00
$machine->screenshot("sandbox_info");
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
nixos/tests/chromium: Split up into subtests This makes it easier to test just a specific channel rather than to force testing all builds down the users/testers throat. Especially this makes it easier to test NixOS channel upgrades only against the Chromium stable channel instead of just removing the beta/dev channels from the tests entirely (as done in 69ec09f38aa1f1d37baec73ebdf9cf5f21050f94). Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2016-02-29 23:20:27 +00:00
$machine->succeed("${xdo "submit-url" ''
search --sync --onlyvisible --name "sandbox status"
windowfocus --sync
''}");
$machine->succeed("${xdo "submit-url" ''
key --delay 1000 Ctrl+a Ctrl+c
''}");
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
nixos/tests/chromium: Split up into subtests This makes it easier to test just a specific channel rather than to force testing all builds down the users/testers throat. Especially this makes it easier to test NixOS channel upgrades only against the Chromium stable channel instead of just removing the beta/dev channels from the tests entirely (as done in 69ec09f38aa1f1d37baec73ebdf9cf5f21050f94). Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2016-02-29 23:20:27 +00:00
my $clipboard = $machine->succeed("${pkgs.xclip}/bin/xclip -o");
die "sandbox not working properly: $clipboard"
unless $clipboard =~ /namespace sandbox.*yes/mi
&& $clipboard =~ /pid namespaces.*yes/mi
&& $clipboard =~ /network namespaces.*yes/mi
&& $clipboard =~ /seccomp.*sandbox.*yes/mi
&& $clipboard =~ /you are adequately sandboxed/mi;
};
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
nixos/tests/chromium: Split up into subtests This makes it easier to test just a specific channel rather than to force testing all builds down the users/testers throat. Especially this makes it easier to test NixOS channel upgrades only against the Chromium stable channel instead of just removing the beta/dev channels from the tests entirely (as done in 69ec09f38aa1f1d37baec73ebdf9cf5f21050f94). Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2016-02-29 23:20:27 +00:00
$machine->shutdown;
nixos: Add rudimentary VM tests for Chromium. Currently, the test is only for testing the user namespace sandbox and even that isn't very representative, because we're running the tests as root. But apart from that, we should have functionality for opening/closing windows and the main goal here is to get them as deterministic as possible, because Chromium usually isn't very nice to chained xdotool keystrokes. And of course, the most important "test" we have here: We know at least whether Chromium works _at_all_. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2014-11-18 17:41:56 +00:00
'';
nixos/tests/chromium: Split up into subtests This makes it easier to test just a specific channel rather than to force testing all builds down the users/testers throat. Especially this makes it easier to test NixOS channel upgrades only against the Chromium stable channel instead of just removing the beta/dev channels from the tests entirely (as done in 69ec09f38aa1f1d37baec73ebdf9cf5f21050f94). Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
2016-02-29 23:20:27 +00:00
}) {
stable = pkgs.chromium;
beta = pkgs.chromiumBeta;
dev = pkgs.chromiumDev;
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink