OpenBSD doesn't support `lutimes`, but does support `utimensat` which
subsumes it. In fact, all the BSDs, Linux, and newer macOS all support
it. So lets make this our first choice for the implementation.
In addition, let's get rid of the `lutimes` `ENOSYS` special case. The
Linux manpage says
> ENOSYS
>
> The kernel does not support this call; Linux 2.6.22 or later is
> required.
which I think is the origin of this check, but that's a very old version
of Linux at this point. The code can be simplified a lot of we drop
support for it here (as we've done elsewhere, anyways).
Co-Authored-By: John Ericson <John.Ericson@Obsidian.Systems>
(cherry picked from commit d023202811)
We don't apply any patches to it, and vendoring it locks users into
bugs (it hasn't been updated since its introduction in late 2021).
Closes https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/164
Change-Id: Ied071c841fc30b0dfb575151afd1e7f66970fdb9
(cherry picked from commit 80405d06264f0de1c16ee2646388ab501df20628)
This makes for shorter and more portable code.
The only tricky part is catching exceptions: I just searched for near by
`catch (Error &)` or `catch (SysError &)` and adjusted them to `catch
(std::filesystem::filesystem_error &)` according to my human judgement.
Good for windows portability; will help @siddhantk232 with his GSOC
project.
Closes#10585
As it turns out, libseccomp maintains an internal syscall table and
validates each rule against it. This means that when using libseccomp
2.5.4 or older, one may pass `452` as syscall number against it, but
since it doesn't exist in the internal structure, `libseccomp` will refuse
to create a filter for that. This happens with nixpkgs-23.11, i.e. on
stable NixOS and when building Nix against the project's flake.
To work around that
* a backport of libseccomp 2.5.5 on upstream nixpkgs has been
scheduled[1].
* the package now uses libseccomp 2.5.5 on its own already. This is to
provide a quick fix since the correct fix for 23.11 is still a staging cycle
away.
It must not be possible to build a Nix with an incompatible libseccomp
version (nothing can be built in a sandbox on Linux!), so configure.ac
rejects libseccomp if `__SNR_fchmodat2` is not defined.
We still need the compat header though since `SCMP_SYS(fchmodat2)`
internally transforms this into `__SNR_fchmodat2` which points to
`__NR_fchmodat2` from glibc 2.39, so it wouldn't build on glibc 2.38.
The updated syscall table from libseccomp 2.5.5 is NOT used for that
step, but used later, so we need both, our compat header and their
syscall table 🤷
[1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/306070
autoconf authors apparently decided that setting `-O2` by default was a good idea. I disagree, and Nix has its own way of deciding that (with `OPTIMIZE={0,1}`). Explicitly set `CFLAGS` and `CXXFLAGS` in the configure script to disable that behaviour.
Fix#9965
Changes:
- CPP variable is now `USE_READLINE` not `READLINE`
- `configure.ac` supports with new CLI flag
- `package.nix` supports with new configuration option
- `flake.nix` CIs this (along with no markdown)
Remove old Ubuntu 16.04 stop-gap too, as that is now quite old.
Motivation:
- editline does not build for Windows, but readline *should*. (I am
still working on this in Nixpkgs at this time, however. So there will
be a follow-up Nix PR removing the windows-only skipping of the
readline library once I am done.)
- Per
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/nix/-/blob/master/debian/rules?ref_type=heads#L27
and #2551, Debian builds Nix with readline. Now we better support and
CI that build configuration.
This is picking up where #2551 left off, ensuring we test a few more
things not merely have CPP for them.
Co-authored-by: Weijia Wang <9713184+wegank@users.noreply.github.com>
It might seem obnoxious to have yet more configure flags, but I found
controlling both the unit and functional tests with one flag was quite
confusing because they are so different:
- unit tests depending on building, functional tests don't (e.g. when
we test already-built Nix)
- unit tests can be installed, functional tests cannot
- unit tests neeed extra libraries (GTest, RapidCheck), functional
tests need extra executables (jq).
- unit tests are run by `make check`, functional tests are run by `make
installcheck`
Really on a technical level, they seem wholly independent. Only on a
human level ("they are both are tests") do they have anything in common.
I had messed up the logic in cross builds because of this. Now I
split the flag in two (and cleaned up a few other inconsistencies), and
the logic fixed itself.
Co-Authored-By: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
I wrote the `configure.ac` wrong, and so we just got no builds
supporting ACLs.
Also, it needs to be more precise because Darwin puts other stuff in
that same header, evidently.
The problem was that f880469173 forgot
that the `#include <sys/xattr.h>` was guarded by an `#ifdef __linux__`.
However, the build failure was only on FreeBSD --- turns out other
platforms have this header too!
The fix therefore uses a new configure check so we properly clear ACLs
on more platforms.
Closes#9343
See that issue for motivation.
Installing these is disabled by default, but we enable it (and the
additional output we want isntall these too so as not to clutter the
existing ones) to use in cross builds and dev shells.
Additionally this skipping of the building is reimplemented to be a bit
more robust and use the same idioms as the functionality for skipping
the tests. In particular, it will now work even if the source files
exist, so we can do this during development too.
The motivation is as stated in issue #7814: even though the the C++ API
is internal and unstable, people still want it to be well documented for
sake of learning, code review, and other purposes that aren't predicated
on it being stable.
Fixes#7814
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Building without tests is useful for bootstrapping with a smaller footprint
or running the tests in a separate derivation. Otherwise, we do compile and
run them.
This isn't fine grained as to allow picking `check` but not `installcheck`
or vice versa, but it's good enough for now.
I've tried to use Nixpkgs' `checkInputs`, but those inputs weren't discovered
properly by the configure script. We can emulate its behavior very well though.
- `AC_LANG_PUSH(C++)` is needed for the header check
- The library check is hopeless (without lots of third-party macros I
don't feel like getting) because name mangling
Pkg-config would make all this easier. I previously opened
https://github.com/emil-e/rapidcheck/issues/302, I should write a PR
too.
That flag breaks `-lc++fs` (introducing a duplicate symbol for some
reason). Besides, it was apparently needed for bzip2, but we're not using bzip2
anymore.
With this, Nix will write a copy of the sandbox shell to /bin/sh in
the sandbox rather than bind-mounting it from the host filesystem.
This makes /bin/sh work out of the box with nix-static, i.e. you no
longer get
/nix/store/qa36xhc5gpf42l3z1a8m1lysi40l9p7s-bootstrap-stage4-stdenv-linux/setup: ./configure: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
See also: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/73998. Busybox's
FEATURE_SH_STANDALONE feature causes other busybox applets to
leak into the sandbox, where system() calls will start preferring
them over tools in $PATH. On arch, this even includes `ar`.
Let's check for this evil feature and disallow using this as a
sandbox shell.
gives 2-5% performance improvement across a board of tests.
LTO is broken when using clang; some libs link fine while others crash
the linker with a segfault in the llvm linker plugin. 🙁
