mirror of
https://github.com/NixOS/nix.git
synced 2024-11-21 14:22:29 +00:00
WIP moving info from builtins.derivation
docs
This commit is contained in:
parent
192616176d
commit
a8b1e3f202
@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
|
||||
# Derivations
|
||||
|
||||
The most important built-in function is `derivation`, which is used to describe a single derivation:
|
||||
a specification for running an executable on precisely defined input files to repeatably produce output files at uniquely determined file system paths.
|
||||
The most important built-in function is `derivation`, which is used to describe a single store-layer [derivation].
|
||||
Consult the [store chapter](@docroot@/store/drv.md) for what a derivation is;
|
||||
this section just concerns how to create one from the Nix language.
|
||||
|
||||
It takes as input an attribute set, the attributes of which specify the inputs to the process.
|
||||
This builtin function takes as input an attribute set, the attributes of which specify the inputs to the process.
|
||||
It outputs an attribute set, and produces a [derivation] as a side effect of evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
[derivation]: @docroot@/glossary.md#gloss-derivation
|
||||
@ -15,7 +16,7 @@ It outputs an attribute set, and produces a [derivation] as a side effect of eva
|
||||
- [`name`]{#attr-name} ([String](@docroot@/language/types.md#type-string))
|
||||
|
||||
A symbolic name for the derivation.
|
||||
It is added to the [store path] of the corresponding [derivation] as well as to its [output paths](@docroot@/glossary.md#gloss-output-path).
|
||||
See [derivation outputs](@docroot@/store/drv.md#outputs) for what this is affects.
|
||||
|
||||
[store path]: @docroot@/store/store-path.md
|
||||
|
||||
@ -33,12 +34,7 @@ It outputs an attribute set, and produces a [derivation] as a side effect of eva
|
||||
|
||||
- [`system`]{#attr-system} ([String](@docroot@/language/types.md#type-string))
|
||||
|
||||
The system type on which the [`builder`](#attr-builder) executable is meant to be run.
|
||||
|
||||
A necessary condition for Nix to build derivations locally is that the `system` attribute matches the current [`system` configuration option].
|
||||
It can automatically [build on other platforms](@docroot@/language/derivations.md#attr-builder) by forwarding build requests to other machines.
|
||||
|
||||
[`system` configuration option]: @docroot@/command-ref/conf-file.md#conf-system
|
||||
See [system](@docroot@/store/drv.md#system).
|
||||
|
||||
> **Example**
|
||||
>
|
||||
@ -68,7 +64,7 @@ It outputs an attribute set, and produces a [derivation] as a side effect of eva
|
||||
|
||||
- [`builder`]{#attr-builder} ([Path](@docroot@/language/types.md#type-path) | [String](@docroot@/language/types.md#type-string))
|
||||
|
||||
Path to an executable that will perform the build.
|
||||
See [builder](@docroot@/store/drv.md#builder).
|
||||
|
||||
> **Example**
|
||||
>
|
||||
@ -117,7 +113,7 @@ It outputs an attribute set, and produces a [derivation] as a side effect of eva
|
||||
|
||||
Default: `[ ]`
|
||||
|
||||
Command-line arguments to be passed to the [`builder`](#attr-builder) executable.
|
||||
See [args](@docroot@/store/drv.md#args).
|
||||
|
||||
> **Example**
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Derivation and Deriving Path
|
||||
|
||||
So far, we have covered "inert" store objects.
|
||||
So far, we have covered "inert" [store objects][store object].
|
||||
But the point of the Nix store layer is to be a build system.
|
||||
Other system (like Git or IPFS) also store and transfer immutable data, but they don't concern themselves with *how* that data was created.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ The two concepts need to be introduced together because, as described below, eac
|
||||
|
||||
## [Derivation]{#derivation}
|
||||
|
||||
A derivation is a specification for running an executable on precisely defined input files to repeatably produce output files at uniquely determined file system paths.
|
||||
|
||||
What is natural Unix analog for a build step *in action*?
|
||||
Answer: a process that will eventually exit, leaving behind some output date.
|
||||
What is the natural way to *plan* such a step?
|
||||
@ -38,16 +40,6 @@ The last bit of information is to take advantage of the fact that Nix allows *he
|
||||
The process's job is to produce the outputs, but have no other important side effects.
|
||||
The rules around this will be discussed in following sections.
|
||||
|
||||
### Output name
|
||||
|
||||
Most outputs are named `drv.name + '-' + outputName`.
|
||||
However, an output named "out" is just has name `drv.name`.
|
||||
This is to allow derivations with a single output to avoid a superfluous `-<outputName>` in their single output's name when no disambiguation is needed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Placeholder
|
||||
|
||||
TODO
|
||||
|
||||
### Referencing
|
||||
|
||||
Derivations are always referred to by the store path of the store object they are encoded to.
|
||||
@ -55,6 +47,79 @@ The store path name is the derivation name with `.drv` suffixed at the end.
|
||||
The store path digest we will explain in a following section after we go over the different variants of derivations, as the exact algorithm depends on them.
|
||||
Suffice to say for now, it is (a form of) content addressing based on the derivation and its inputs.
|
||||
|
||||
> NOTE:
|
||||
> Actually we have defined "text addressing" already in "content-addressing store objects".
|
||||
> Note that we reserve the right to format new sorts of derivations on-disk differently in the future.
|
||||
> The choice of "text hashing" should be deemd arbitrary along with the choice of "ATerm" serialization.
|
||||
> Maybe this should be moved below to "encoding?".
|
||||
|
||||
### Outputs {#outputs}
|
||||
|
||||
The outputs are the derivations are the store objects it is obligated to produce.
|
||||
|
||||
Outputs are assigned names, and also consistent of other information based on the type of derivation.
|
||||
|
||||
Output names can be any string which is also a valid [store path] name.
|
||||
The store path of the output store object (also called an [output path] for short), has a name based on the derivation name and the output name.
|
||||
Most outputs are named `drvMame + '-' + outputName`.
|
||||
However, an output named "out" is just has name `drvName`.
|
||||
This is to allow derivations with a single output to avoid a superfluous `-<outputName>` in their single output's name when no disambiguation is needed.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Example**
|
||||
>
|
||||
> A derivation is named `hello`, and has two outputs, `out`, and `dev`
|
||||
>
|
||||
> - The derivation's path will be: `/nix/store/<hash>-hello.drv`.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> - The store path of `out` will be: `/nix/store/<hash>-hello`.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> - The store path of `dev` will be: `/nix/store/<hash>-hello-dev`.
|
||||
|
||||
### System {#system}
|
||||
|
||||
The system type on which the [`builder`](#attr-builder) executable is meant to be run.
|
||||
|
||||
A necessary condition for Nix to build derivations locally is that the `system` attribute matches the current [`system` configuration option].
|
||||
It can automatically [build on other platforms](@docroot@/language/derivations.md#attr-builder) by forwarding build requests to other machines.
|
||||
|
||||
[`system` configuration option]: @docroot@/command-ref/conf-file.md#conf-system
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Builder {#builder}
|
||||
|
||||
Path to an executable that will perform the build.
|
||||
|
||||
### Args {#args}
|
||||
|
||||
Command-line arguments to be passed to the [`builder`](#builder) executable.
|
||||
|
||||
### Environment Variables {#env}
|
||||
|
||||
Environment variables which will be passed to the [`builder`](#builder) executable.
|
||||
|
||||
### Placeholder
|
||||
|
||||
TODO
|
||||
|
||||
Two types:
|
||||
|
||||
- Reference to own outputs
|
||||
|
||||
- output derived paths (see below), corresponding to store paths we haven't yet realized.
|
||||
|
||||
> N.B. Current method of creating hashes which we substitute for string fields should be seen as an artifact of the current ATerm formula.
|
||||
> In order to be more explicit, and avoid gotchas analogous to [SQL injection](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL_injection),
|
||||
> we ought to consider switching two a different format where we explicitly use a syntax for a oncatentation of plain strings and placeholders written more explicitly.
|
||||
|
||||
### Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
The inputs are a set of [deriving paths].
|
||||
Each of these must be [realised] prior to building the derivation in
|
||||
question.
|
||||
At that point, the derivation can be normalized replacing each input
|
||||
derived path with its store path --- which we now now since we've
|
||||
realised it.
|
||||
|
||||
## [Deriving path]{#deriving-path}
|
||||
|
||||
Deriving paths are a way to refer to [store objects][store object] that might not yet be [realised][realise].
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user